Erratum and Corrigendum
Applied Information System and Management (AISM) corrects errors in published articles openly, so that readers can rely on the scholarly record. This policy sets out the basis, authority, and procedure for publishing errata and corrigenda, in line with the COPE guidelines and the accreditation standards for scientific journals in Indonesia. Serious problems that make an article unreliable are handled under the Retraction and Withdrawal policy.
Types of Correction
| Type | Source of the error | Examples |
| Erratum | Introduced by the journal during copyediting, typesetting, layout, metadata entry, or online publication | A wrong figure placed in the PDF, a misspelt author name in the metadata, a missing reference introduced during layout |
| Corrigendum | Made by the authors and identified after acceptance or publication | An error in a table value, an incorrect affiliation, a missing funding statement or citation, a correction to the author list |
When a Correction Is Appropriate
A correction is published when a small part of an otherwise reliable article is inaccurate or misleading, and the error does not make the main findings or conclusions unreliable. If an error does make the data, findings, or conclusions unreliable, the article is considered for retraction instead.
Every change to the content of a published article, other than a purely technical fix that does not change the meaning, such as a broken link, is made through a published erratum or corrigendum. Published articles are never changed silently.
Changes or Additions to Accepted Articles
All content of accepted and published articles is subject to editorial review. Authors who wish to add, revise, or replace content after acceptance submit a formal request to the Editor in Chief:
- if the new material substantially extends the study, it is submitted for peer review as a new manuscript that refers back to the original article;
- if the new material corrects or replaces content in the accepted or published article, the Editor in Chief may approve an erratum or corrigendum; and
- changes to the author list follow the Authorship Criteria and require the written agreement of all authors.
Authority
Authors, readers, or the editorial team may report an error. Every correction request is assessed by the Editor in Chief, who decides whether the correction is warranted, which type of notice is issued, and the wording of the notice. If the Editor in Chief has a conflict of interest, another senior editor decides.
Procedure
Correction Notice
Every correction notice:
- is published promptly as a separate, openly accessible item in the next issue, with its own DOI;
- is titled "Erratum:" or "Corrigendum:" followed by the title of the original article;
- cites the original article, its authors, and its DOI;
- describes the error and the correction clearly, and states who decided it; and
- is linked in both directions with the original article.
The Corrected Article
- The article page shows a clear note with a link to the correction notice.
- A corrected version of the PDF may be published, marked "Corrected version" with the date of correction and a reference to the notice. The original version remains available in the article's version history.
- The volume, issue, page numbers, publication date, and DOI of the original article do not change.
- The DOI record at Crossref and the article metadata are updated so that indexing services also show the correction.

