PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Peer Review Process

Some policies in the review of Applied Information System and Management (AISM):

• Initial Editorial Review: The Editorial Board will firstly review the submitted manuscripts based on the Focus and Scope and the similarity assessment following the Publication Ethics of the journal.
• Format Compliance Check: The reviewers will review the submitted article that follow the guidelines and template of the journal provided.
• Double-Blind Review: The review process in this journal employs a double-blind peer-review, which means that the identity of the author and the reviewer are unknown to one another. The aim is to remove the possibility of bias based on gender, ethnicity, nationality, institution or previous accomplishments of the author.
• Multiple Reviewers: In the review process, the article will be reviewed by at least two reviewers to ensure the quality of the article.
• Quality Assessment: In the review process, the reviewers ensure the quality of the articles of its title, abstract, discussion and conclusion. Besides, the reviewers also address the novelty and its contribution to the scientific discussion and verify the plagiarism and ethics of publication.
• Reviewer Recommendations: The reviewer also provide feedback on whether the article is accepted, rejected or need minor or major revision.
• Editorial Decision: The final decision of manuscript acceptance shall be made by the Editorial Board according to reviewers critical comments.
• Timeline: It is hoped that the review process decision will be announced to the authors within around two months.