Peran Komisi Yudisial Dalam Menegakkan Keluhuran Martabat Hakim
Abstract
Abstract
This study aims to determine the role of the Judicial Commission in supervising judges. The authority of the Judicial Commission in overseeing the behavior of judges in the context of upholding honor and dignity as well as maintaining the behavior of judges and also the position and implementation of the supervisory function for judges in order to realize an independent judicial function to uphold law and justice for all Indonesian people. In addition, so that each judge can behave properly and fairly in dealing with a clean judiciary and in accordance with what has been regulated in the legislation. The research method used is normative juridical, namely research that focuses on studying the application of a norm or rule of law. The results showed that the Judicial Commission is an independent judicial body, where the Judicial Commission has the authority to supervise judges and maintain and uphold the honor, nobleness, and behavior of judges. Community elements can also be involved in monitoring, so that politicization of Supreme Court judges can be reduced.
Keywords: Oversight, Judicial Commission, Judge
Keywords
References
Ahmad, Mujahidin. Peradilan Satu Atap Di Indonesia, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2007.
Aji, A.M.; Yunus, N.R. Basic Theory of Law and Justice, Jakarta: Jurisprudence Institute, 2018.
Amran, Suadi. Sistem Pengawasan Badan Peradilan di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.
Helmi, Nuky Nugroho. Dinamika Wewenang Komisi Yudisial Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Komisi Yudisial, Jurnal Kosmik Hukum, Volume 17 Nomor 2 Juni 2017.
Henry, P. Panggabean. Fungsi Mahkamah Agung Dalam Praktik Sehari-hari, Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 2001.
Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Risalah Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, (Jakarta, Pusat Akademis dan layanan informasi, 2013)
Lintje, Anna Marpaung. Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Andi, 2018.
Maggalatung, A.S.; Aji, A.M.; Yunus, N.R. How The Law Works, Jakarta: Jurisprudence Institute, 2014.
Mahkamah Agung RI, Cetak Biru Pembaruan Peradilan 2010-2035, Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung, 2010.
Muhamad, Yasin. Panduan Bantua Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2014.
Ni’matul, Huda. Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.
Patrialis, Akbar. Lembaga-lembaga Negara Menurut UUD NRI Tahun 1945, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offset, 2013.
Riri, Nazriyah. Sengketa Lembaga Negara Antara Komisi Yudisial Dengan Mahkamah Agung, Jurnal Hukum, Nomor. 1 Volume 13 Januari 2006.
Surajuddin; & Zulkarnain. Komisi Yudisial dan Estimasi Publik, Jakarta: PT. Citra Aditya bakti, 2006.
Titik, Triwulan Tutik. Konstruksi Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945, Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.
Yunus, Nur Rohim; Diyani, Trini. “Implementasi Whistleblowing System Sebagai Upaya Menumbuhkan Kepercayaan Politik Terhadap Lembaga DPR RI,” STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal, Volume 1 Nomor 2 (2017).
https://m.detik.com/news/berita/2882697/konflik-ma-ky-soal-seleksi-hakim-dpr-diminta-ikut-bertanggung-jawab
https://regional.kompas.com/read/2019/03/13/23074761/dari-2015-hingga-2018-ky-terima-6368-laporan-terkait-perilaku-hakim
https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt580fd463233f4/perbedaan-kewenangan-ma-dengan-ky-dalam-pengawasan-hakim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v1i2.13025
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.