Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Gudang Garam Dan Gudang Baru (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 104 PK/Pid.Sus/2015)

Muhamad Ikbal Hajizi, Mohammad Ali Wafa, Muhammad Yasir

Abstract


Abstract:

Provisions regarding the resolution of trademark disputes in CHAPTER XV of Law Number 20 Year 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications state that the procedure for resolving trademark disputes can be carried out in civil cases through the Commercial Court within the scope of General Courts/District Courts, Crimes through District Courts, Arbitration through Arbitration Institutions, and Other alternative dispute resolution in accordance with the agreement of the parties to the dispute. The existence of provisions regarding civil and criminal settlement in trademark problems sometimes causes polemic, because in the legal world the boundary between criminal law and civil law is very thin. Therefore, it is not uncommon in trademark disputes that should be resolved by civil law instead ends with criminal sanctions. The purpose of this study is to find out the procedure for resolving trademark disputes if resolved in a Civil and criminal manner, as well as the causes of Dissenting Opinion of the Supreme Court judges in examining the Review of the New Gudang brand in decision No. 104 PK/ Pid.Sus / 2015.

Keywords: Brand Dispute Resolution, Dissenting Opinion


Keywords


Brand Dispute Resolution, Dissenting Opinion

References


Aji, A.M.; Yunus, N.R. Basic Theory of Law and Justice, Jakarta: Jurisprudence Institute, 2018.

Bakhri, Syaiful. Penggunaan Pidana Denda dan Pemidanaan dalam Perundang-undangan, Jurnal Hukum: No. 21 Vol. 9, September 2002.

Casavera. 8 Kasus Sengketa Merek di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2009.

Damian, Edi; dkk, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Bandung: PT. ALUMNI, 2011.

Hamzah, Andi. KUHP & KUHAP(edisi revisi), Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2011.

Hamzah, Andi. Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia dan Retribusi ke Reformasi, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1995.

Janed, Rahmi. Merek TradeMark law dalam Era Global dan Integrasi Ekonomi, Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Kansil, C.S.T., Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1986.

M. Hadjon, Philipus. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: PT Bina Ilmu, 1987.

Maggalatung, A.S.; Aji, A.M.; Yunus, N.R. How The Law Works, Jakarta: Jurisprudence Institute, 2014.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.

Premesti, Tri Jaya Ayu. Pengertian Ultimum Remedium dan Primum Remdium dalam Hukum Pidana, Hukum Online.com, Diakses pada hari selasa, 20 November 2018 Pukul 10:00.

Saidin, OK. Aspek Kekayaan Intelektual, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo persada, 2000.

Soebekti, R; & Tjitrosudibio, R. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: Balai Pusataka (Persero), 2014.

Soekanto, Soerjono; & Mahmudji, Sri. Peranan dan Penggunaan Kepustakaan di Dalam Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Pusat Dokumen Universitas Indonesia, 1979.

Sudarto. Hukum Pidana dan Perkembangan Masyarakat (Kajian Terhadap Hukum Pidana), Bandung: Sinar Baru 2001.

Sujatmiko, Agung. Tinjauan Filosofis Perlindungan Ha katas Merek, Jurnal Media Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, 2011.

Sutedi, Adrian. Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

Utman, Rachmadi. Hukum dan Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual perlindungan dan dimensi hukumnya di Indonesia), Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2011.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v1i2.12007 Abstract - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.