E-Government Service for Driving Digital Creative Economy in Developing Region: Perspective of Technology Readiness Index and PLS-SEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15408/aism.v8i1.45514Keywords:
Digital Creative Economic Transformation, E-Government, Rumahekraf, Technology Acceptance Model, Technology Readiness IndexAbstract
E-government plays an important role in digital economic transformation by improving access to public services and driving economic growth. One implementation in West Papua Province is Rumahekraf, a digital marketing platform for creative economy players in the local region. However, the adoption of this platform is still low, and not many studies have examined factors that influence public acceptance of this service. Therefore, this study aims to identify factors that contribute to and inhibit users' intentions to adopt this platform in West Papua. We combine the Technology Readiness Index (TRI) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to understand this phenomenon. Data was gathered via an online survey utilizing Google Forms, consisting of 157 merchants/business owners. The information was examined employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The research indicates that innovativeness, perceived ease of use (PEOU), and facilitating conditions play an important role in increasing users’ intention to adopt Rumahekraf (R² = 59.4%). Additionally, PEOU also contributes to increased perceived usefulness (PU) (R² = 41.1%), which in turn strengthens the benefits perceived by users (R² = 55.7%). Optimism significantly affects PEOU but not usefulness. Meanwhile, insecurity and discomfort were not found to be major barriers to the adoption of this platform. This research provides insights for local government and platform development in improving the effectiveness of e-government implementation in West Papua by providing more adequate infrastructure and increasing public trust in the platform.
Downloads
References
Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,” Int J Inf Manage, vol. 57, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002.
P. Patil, N. Rana, Y. Dwivedi, and H. Abu-Hamour, “Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) The Role of Trust and Risk in Mobile Payments Adoption: A Meta-Analytic Review,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/129
N. P. Rana, S. Luthra, S. K. Mangla, R. Islam, S. Roderick, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Barriers to the Development of Smart Cities in Indian Context,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 503–525, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10796-018-9873-4.
W. Khristianto, “E-GOVERNMENT: STAGES MODEL, MODEL KEMITRAAN DAN KESIAPAN ORGANISASI,” 2017.
M. M. Albiman and Z. Sulong, “THE ROLE OF ICT IN THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF THE SUB SAHARAN AFRICAN REGION (SSA),” 2016.
A. Purwanto and Y. Sudargini, “Partial Least Squares Structural Squation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Analysis for Social and Management Research : A Literature Review,” Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, vol. 2, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.7777/jiemar.v2i4.
V. Kenny and C. M. Firdausy,
“Effect_Performance_Expectation_Effort,” JURNAL MANAJEMEN BISNIS DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN, vol. Vol. 6, 2021.
U. Chotijah and F. Retrialisca, “Analysis of Information Technology Readiness in Furniture Business in Indonesia,” 2020.
R. K. Julian and A. Dhini, “The Role of Technology Readiness towards Technology Acceptance on Smartwatch Use,” 2022.
N. Larasati, “Technology Readiness and Technology Acceptance Model in New Technology Implementation Process in Low Technology SMEs,” International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, pp. 113–117, 2017, doi: 10.18178/ijimt.2017.8.2.713.
D. K. Rinjany, “Does Technology Readiness and Acceptance Induce more Adoption of E-Government? 68 Does Technology Readiness and Acceptance Induce more Adoption of E-Government? Applying the UTAUT and TRI on an Indonesian Complaint-Based Application,” 2020, doi: 10.30589/pgr.
R. Edmunds, M. Thorpe, and G. Conole, “Student attitudes towards and use of ICT in course study, work and social activity: A technology acceptance model approach,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 71–84, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01142.x.
Y. Helena Chiu, S. Fang, and C. Tseng, “Early versus potential adopters,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 443–459, May 2010, doi: 10.1108/09590551011045357.
H. S. H. Gombachika and G. Khangamwa, “ICT readiness and acceptance among TEVT students in University of Malawi,” Campus-Wide Information Systems, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 35–43, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1108/10650741311288805.
A. Parasuraman and C. L. Colby, “An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0,” J Serv Res, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59–74, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1094670514539730.
A. Alawneh, H. Al-Refai, and K. Batiha, “Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 277–288, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.03.001.
Y. K. Dwivedi, N. P. Rana, A. Jeyaraj, M. Clement, and M. D. Williams, “Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 719–734, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y.
A. Parasuraman, “Technology Readiness Index (TRI) A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies,” 2000.
Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1989, doi: 10.36863/mds.a.14027.
V. Venkatesh, R. H. Smith, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, F. D. Davis, and S. M. Walton, “Quarterly USER ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW1,” 2003.
V. J. Y. T. and X. Xu. Venkatesh, Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, vol. 157–178. MIS quarterly, 2012.
M. Felea, M. Bucur, C. Negruțiu, M. Nițu, and D. A. Stoica, “Wearable technology adoption among romanian students: A structural model based on Tam,” Amfiteatru Economic, vol. 23, no. 57, pp. 376–391, 2021, doi: 10.24818/EA/2021/57/376.
K. J. Kim and D.-H. Shin, “An acceptance model for smart watches,” Internet Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 527–541, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0126.
D. F. STĂNESCU and M. C. ROMAȘCANU, “Applying Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Explore Users’ Behavioral Intention to Adopt Wearables Technologies,” 2021.
I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, Dec. 1991, doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
R. Agarwal and J. Prasad, “A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology,” Information Systems Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 204–215, 1998, doi: 10.1287/isre.9.2.204.
M. L. Meuter, A. L. Ostrom, M. J. Bitner, and R. Roundtree, “The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies,” J Bus Res, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 899–906, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00276-4.
Ms. Jailani, S. Negeri, B. Provinsi Jambi, and U. Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, “Teknik Pengumpulan Data Dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah,” 2023. [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.yayasanpendidikandzurriyatulquran.id/index.php/ihsan
J. W. . Creswell, Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, 2003.
I. Etikan, “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling,” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, and Albert-Georg Lang and Axel Buchner, “Statistics textbooks in the,” 2007.
M. Firmansyah, I. Dewa, and K. Yudha, “The essence of the difference between qualitative and quantitative methods,” 2021.
J. F. . Hair, G. T. M. . Hult, C. M. . Ringle, and Marko. Sarstedt, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, 2017.
J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and R. R. Sinkovics, “The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing,” Advances in International Marketing, vol. 20, pp. 277–319, 2009, doi: 10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014.
M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling,” in Handbook of Market Research, Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 1–47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2.
D. I. Inan et al., “Factors influencing mobile tourism recommender systems adoption by smart travellers: Perceived value and parasocial interaction perspectives,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Springer, 2020, pp. 52–62. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-50350-5_5.
D. I. Inan et al., “Because Follower Experience Matters: The Continuance Intention to Follow Recommendation of the Influencer,” Hum Behav Emerg Technol, vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/3684192.
J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Jan. 14, 2019, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
D. I. Inan et al., “How personal, technical, social environments affecting generation Z to utilise video-based sharing platform in learning process during crisis?,” Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn, vol. 19, p. 003, May 2023, doi: 10.58459/rptel.2024.19003.
M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling,” in Handbook of Market Research, Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 1–47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2.
J. H. Kandami, D. Iskandar Inan, R. Juita, L. Yertas Baisa, M. Sanglise, and M. Indra, “Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Informatika Development and Evaluation of Android-based Infrastructure Rental Application: A Design Science Research Approach Article Info ABSTRACT,” vol. 10, pp. 37–47, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://http://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/jtmi
M. Patabang, Dedi Iskandar Inan, Amestina Matualage, and M. Indra, “The Moderation Effect of Technology Anxiety on Digital Transformation Readiness in Public Universities: An Organizational Readiness Approach,” JUSIFO (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 59–70, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.19109/jusifo.v10i2.23969.
C. F. Risdiyanto, D. I. Inan, R. N. Wurarah, and O. A. Fenetiruma, “Analisis Faktor-faktor Pendukung dan Penghambat Beralih Mengadopsi Mobile Banking di Papua Barat Memanfaatkan PLS-SEM dan Perspektif Status Quo Bias,” MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 637–646, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.57152/malcom.v4i2.1289.
J. F. Hair, L. M. Matthews, R. L. Matthews, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use ‘PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use,’” 2017.
D. I. Inan et al., “Service quality and self-determination theory towards continuance usage intention of mobile banking,” Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 303–328, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-01-2021-0005.
D. I. Inan et al., “Technology anxiety and social influence towards intention to use of ride-hailing service in Indonesia,” Case Stud Transp Policy, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1591–1601, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.05.017.
A. D. Oktavia, D. I. Inan, R. N. Wurarah, and O. A. Fenetiruma, “Analysis of Determinants of E-Wallet Adoption in West Papua: Extended UTAUT 2 and Perceived Risk,” MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 587–600, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.57152/malcom.v4i2.1277.
I. S. Wijaya, “Analysis of Edmodo E-Learning Success by Adopting the DeLone & Mclean Model at Universitas Dinamika Bangsa,” Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 9, no. 3, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.mdp.ac.id
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nanes Fitri Rahmawati, Dedi I. Inan, Ratna Juita, Muhamad Indra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.