Analysis of Information Technology Governance Priorities at PTKIN Using The COBIT 2019 Framework

Authors

  • Nur Aeni Hidayah (Scopus ID: 56580175700) Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4640-0053
  • Junaidi Junaidi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Elvi Fetrina UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Suci Ratnawati UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/aism.v8i1.45011

Keywords:

Risk Management, IT Governance, COBIT 2019, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Abstract

Risk management is a part of information technology (IT) governance, enabling organizations to safeguard their information assets effectively and efficiently. It involves identifying potential risks, planning mitigation strategies, and establishing relevant policies. An interview with the Head of Pustipanda at Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University (SIU) Jakarta revealed that the university underwent an IT governance audit by the National Cyber and Crypto Agency in 2020, with results indicating the need for significant improvements. Given the critical role of the Academic Information System (AIS) as a strategic IT asset in higher education, effective management is essential. This study aims to evaluate the IT governance maturity of Pustipanda using the COBIT 2019 framework and to identify key governance domains that should be prioritized for improvement. The study focuses on the IT governance of Pustipanda Syarif Hidayatullah SIU Jakarta, selected as a sample from the broader population of PTKIN (State Islamic Religious Colleges) in Indonesia. Using the COBIT 2019 framework, the research identifies 22 IT governance domains prioritized for implementation, with six domains categorized as top priority. These findings provide actionable insights for IT governance enhancement, particularly in academic institutions. The methodology presented can serve as a reference for other PTKIN to assess and prioritize IT governance domains according to their specific organizational needs, supporting the development of more secure, efficient, and well-governed IT environments in higher education institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Nur Aeni Hidayah, (Scopus ID: 56580175700) Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
    Information System
  • Junaidi Junaidi, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
    Agribusiness
  • Elvi Fetrina, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
    Infirmation System
  • Suci Ratnawati, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
    Information System

References

Suroso, J. ., & Fakhrozi, M. . (2018). Assessment Of Information System Risk Management with Octave Assessment Of Information Risk Management with Octave Allegro At System Education. Procedia Comput. Sci, 135, 202–213.

Moyo, M. (2014). Information Security Risk Management in Small-Scale Organisations : A Case Study of Secondary Schools. In Computerised Information Systems. University of South Africa.

Dioubute, B. M., Molok, N. N. ., Talib, S., & Trap, A. O. . (2015). Risk assessment model for organizational information security. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci, 30(23), 17607–17613

J. Webb, A. Ahmad, S. B. Maynard, and G. Shanks, “A Situation Awareness Model for Information Security Risk Management,” Comput. Secur., vol. 44, pp. 1–15, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2014.04.005.

T. M and M. J, “Information Security Risk Assessment Toolkit,” Elsevier, 2013.

K. D, Management Information System. ed 2. 2003.

H. Alves and M. Raposo, “The Influence of University Image On Student Behaviour,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 73–85, 2010, doi: 10.1108/09513541011013060.

I. Sherifi, “Impact of Information Systems in Satisfying Students of the University: Case Study From Epoka University,” Eur. J. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. 04, pp. 167–175, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://www.ejbss.com/recent.aspx-/.

H. A. Salsabila and Iriyadi, “Evaluasi Atas Penerapan Sistem Informasi Akademik Dan Keuangan Terhadap Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus mahasiswa Jurusan Akuntansi S1 Angkatan Tahun 2016 di IBI Kesatuan Bogor),” J. Anal. Sist. Pendidik. Tinggi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 137–148, 2020.

Kuntari, N. L., Chrisnanto, Y. H., & Hadiana, A. I. (2018). Manajemen Risiko Sistem Informasi Di Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Menggunakan Metoda Octave Allegro. Manajemen Risiko Sistem Informasi Di Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Menggunakan Metoda Octave Allegro.

Jakaria, D. A., Dirgahayu, R. T., & Hendrik. (2013). Manajemen Risiko Sistem Informasi Akademik pada Perguruan Tinggi Menggunakan Metoda Octave Allegro. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI), 37–42.

Cholik, M. I. (2018). Analisis Manajemen Risiko Penggunaan Sistem Informasi Menggunakan Metode Octave Allegro ( Studi Kasus PT. XYZ). Bina Nusantara.

Safar, A. (2019). Deteksi Penilaian Resiko Pada e-Learning SMK Bina Prestasi AMI Balikpapan Dengan Metode Octave Allegro. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 2(2), 69–77.

Rosini, Rachmaniah, M., & Mustafa, B. (2015). Penilaian Risiko Kerawanan Informasi Dengan Menggunakan Metode Octave Allegro. Jurnal Pustakawan Indoneisa, 14(1), 1–9.

Zulfia, A., Ruskan, E. L., & Putra, P. (2021). Penilaian Risiko Aset Informasi dengan Metode Octave Allegro : Studi Kasus ICT Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Universitas Sriwijaya. Journal of Information Systems, 6(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.33633/joins.v6i1.4088

M. G. Ginanjar, L. Ramadhan, and R. A. Nugraha, “Perancangan Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Kerangka Kerja COBIT 2019 di DISKOMINFOSAN Kabupaten Sukabumi,” Smart Comp, vol. 10, no. 03, pp. 160–165, 2021.

P. N. Anastasia and L. H. Atrinawati, “Perancangan Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Framework Cobit 2019 Pada Hotel Xyz,” JSI J. Sist. Inf., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2088–2099, 2020, doi: 10.36706/jsi.v12i2.12329.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Analysis of Information Technology Governance Priorities at PTKIN Using The COBIT 2019 Framework. (2025). Applied Information System and Management (AISM), 8(1), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.15408/aism.v8i1.45011