Pengaruh Tipe Kepribadian dan Religiusitas Terhadap Subjective Well Being Pada Wanita Yang Berperan Ganda di Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15408/tazkiya.v20i1.9195Keywords:
subjective well being, type of personality, religiousity, woman with multiple roleAbstract
The aim of this study is to determine the predictor variable for subjective well being as dependent variable of woman with multiple roles. Two independent variables, namely personalitiy and religiousity, are used in order to determine which one of these two independent variables would be the best predictor for „subjective well being.‟ As a quantitative research, the multiple regression analysis is used to measure 200 respondents working at some companies located in North Jakarta and Central Jakarta. Scale measurement is modified from the original scale constructed by Diener et.al (1985) for Subjective Well Being Scale, Watson et.al (1988) for Personality Scale and Lewis Goldberg (1992), Fetzer Institute (1999) for Religiousity for our own research. There is a significant influence that personality and religiousity could be a predictif factor to measure „a subjective well being‟ of woman with multiple role. Dimension measured for the variable of personality here are agreebleness, conscientiousness, and openess to experience, while for religiousity: private religious practice, religious/spiritual history, and organizational religiousness.Downloads
References
Brown & Tierney. (2006). Religion and Subjective well-being Among
China‟s Elderly Population. Goldfarb Center Working Paper, 007-038.
DeNeve, K., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis
of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological
Bulletin, 124 (2), 197-229.
Diener, E. (2005). Guidelines for National indicators of subjective wellbeing and ill-being. Positive Psychology Center. University of Pennyslvania.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95 (3), 542-575.
Diener, E. (2013). The remarkable changes in the science of subjective wellbeing.
Journal of Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10 (2), 321- 345.
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The
satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49 (1), 203-235.
Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1984). Temporal stability and cross-situational
consistency of affective, behavioral, and cognitive responses. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (4), 871–883.
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective wellbeing:
Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (2), 276-302.
Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D.G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion
makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 101 (6), 1278-1290. doi: 10.1037/a0024402.
Feist, J., & Feist, G.J. (2010). Theories of personality, 7th ed. teori
kepribadian, edisi 7, buku 2. Smita Prahita Sjahrini (Terj). Jakarta:
Penerbit Salemba Humanika.
Goldberg. (1992). Possible questionnaire format
