Academic Cheating in Pesantren: How Self Efficacy, Religiosity, and Academic Integrity Predict Academic Cheating
Abstract
Abstract
This research aims to determine the effect of self-efficacy, religiosity and academic integrity on academic cheating in Pesantren. The population of the research is consisted of students MA. Sample are 332 students and sampling technique is carried out using probability sampling, namely purposive sampling technique. The instrument used were ACS (Academic Cheating Scale), GSE (General Self Efficacy), DUREL (Duke Religion Index), and AIS (Academic Integrity Scale). Data analysis used in this study is multiple linear regression techniques and for the analysis of the construct validity used to measure instrument is Confimatory Factor Analysis CFA. The results of the study show that the effect of the variables of self-efficacy, the dimensions of organizational and dimensions intrinsic to academic cheating which was moderated by academic integrity are significant. Based on the results of the multiple linear regression with academic integrity as the moderator variable, shows that academic integrity has a significant effect or influence on academic cheating and also has a significant influence in moderating one independent variable, namely the organizational dimension to academic cheating.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh efikasi diri, religiusitas dan integritas akademik terhadap kecurangan akademik di Pesantren. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa MA. Sampel berjumlah 332 siswa dan teknik pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik probability sampling yaitu teknik purposive sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah ACS (Academic Cheating Scale), GSE (General Self Efficacy), DUREL (Duke Religion Index), dan AIS (Academic Integrity Scale). Analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teknik regresi linier berganda dan untuk analisis validitas konstruk yang digunakan untuk mengukur instrumen adalah Confimatory Factor Analysis CFA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaruh variabel efikasi diri, dimensi organisasi dan dimensi intrinsik terhadap kecurangan akademik yang dimoderatori oleh integritas akademik adalah signifikan. Berdasarkan hasil regresi linier berganda dengan variabel moderator integritas akademik, menunjukkan bahwa integritas akademik berpengaruh atau berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kecurangan akademik dan juga memiliki pengaruh signifikan dalam memoderasi salah satu variabel independen yaitu dimensi organisasi terhadap kecurangan akademik.
How to Cite Lestari, W. I., Latifa, R. Rahmah, M. (2022). Academic Cheating in Pesantren: How Self Efficacy, Religiosity, and Academic Integrity Predict Academic Cheating. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 9(2), 1-18. doi:10.15408/tjems.v9i1.24701.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afrianti, G. (2013). The influence of self-efficacy and religiosity on cheating behavior (cheating) of Cendrawasih 1 Jakarta High School students. Essay. Jakarta: Faculty of Psychology UIN Jakarta
Anderman, EM, et al. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal Of Educational Psychology 1998, Vol. 90, No. 1, 84-93.
Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (6), 1423.
Bandura, A. (1986). Self efficacy: To word a unifying theory of behavioral change, psychological preview. Journal of Psychology 84, 191-215.
Brennecke, P. (2010). Academic integrity at the massachussets institute of technology: A handbook for students. MIT: Massachusetts
Bushway, A., & Nash, WR (1977). School cheating behavior. Review of Educational Research, 47, 632.
Cizek, GJ (2003). Classroom cheating, promoting integrity in assessment. California: Corwin Press, Inc.
Detert, JR, Trevino, LK, & Switzer, VL (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 93, 374-391.
Drake, CA (1941). Why students cheat. The Journal of Higher Education 12(8), 418-420.
Dwi Cahyo, S. (2017). Factors that influence cheating behavior in students and college students in Jakarta. Essay. Jakarta: Faculty of Psychology.
Gore Jr., PA (2006). Academic self efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: Two incremental validity studies. Journal of career assessment 14(1), 92-115.
Iyer, R., & Eastman, JK (2008). The impact of unethical reasoning on academic dishonesty: Exploring the moderating effect of social desirability. Marketing Education Review 18 (2), 1-13.
Jones, LR (2001). Academic integrity & Academic Dishonesty: A handbook about cheating & plagiarism. Revised & expanded edition. Florida Institute of Technology: Melbourne.
Keohane, N. (1999). The fundamental values of academic integrity. The center for Academic Integrity, Duke University, 1-12.
Kirana, A., & Lestari, S. (2017). "If the teacher sees" : Honest and dishonest behavior of high school students based on religion in exam situations. Semarang: Proceedings of the X Scientific Meeting of the Indonesian Developmental Psychology Association.
Koenig, HG, Parkerson, GR, & Meador, KG (1997). Religion index for psychiatric research. American Journal of Psychiatry 153(6), 885-886.
Koenig, HG, Bussing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A Five-Item Measure for Use in Epidemological Studies. Journal of Religion 1, 78-85.doi:10.3390/rel1010078.
Kushartanti, A. (2009). Cheating behavior in terms of self-confidence.Psychological Periodic Scientific Journal 11(2), 38-46.
LaBeff, EE (1990). Situational ethics and college student cheating. Socrologicol Inquiry, Vol.60, No. 2, 190-198.
Maria Tracy, PN (2016). The relationship between moral identity and academic dishonesty of college students in Indonesia. Essay. University of Indonesia: Faculty of Psychology.
McCabe, DL, Butterfield, K. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232.
Muthén, LK, & Muthén, BO (1998-2012). Mplus User's Guide Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA Muthen & Muthen.
Murdock, TB, et al. (2008). Predictors of cheating and cheating attributions: Does classroom context influence cheating and blame for cheating?. European Journal of Psychology of Education 4 (23), 477-492.
Nelson, MF, James, MSL, Miles, A., Morrell, DL, & Sledge, S. (2016). Academic integrity of millennials: The impact of religion and spirituality. Journal of Ethics and Behavior, 27 (5), 385-400.
Okulicsz, Adam., Kozaryn. (2010). Religion and life satisfaction across nations. Mental health, religion & culture 13 (2), 155-169.
Olanrewaju, USA (2010). Correlation between academic cheating behavior and achievement motivation.Nature and Science, 8(12),130-134.
Olasehinde-Williams, O. (2006). Instituting academic integrity in Nigerian Universities: Psychological perspectives of morality and motivation. Journal of Sociology and Education in Africa 4 (2), 154-169.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, MEP (2004). Character Strength and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. London-England: Oxford University Press.
Pramadi, A., Pali, M., Hanurawan, F,. & Atmoko, A. (2017). Academic Cheating in School: A Process of Dissonance Between Knowledge and Conduct.Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (6), 155-162.
Ronokusumo, S. (2012). Academic integrity: Just a word or for real. Jakarta: Publishing Agency of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia.
Sagone, E., & De Caroli, ME (2014). Locus of control and academic self-efficacy in university students: The effects of self-concepts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 114, 222-228.
Samani, M., & Hariyanto. (2012). Concept and capital of character education. Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth.
Sierra, JJ, Hyman, MR (2008). Ethical antecedents of cheating intentions: Evidence of Mediation. Journal of Academic Ethics 6, 51-66.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON, 35-37.
Storch, EA, & Storch, JB (2001). Organizational, non-organizational, and intrinsic religiosity and academic dishonesty. Psychological Reports 88, 548-552.
Sugiyono. (2010). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alphabeta Cet. 11.
Vivien KG Lim & Sean KB See. (2001). Attitudes Toward, And Intentions to Report, Academic Cheating Among Students In Singapore. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 261–274.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v9i1.24701 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, p-ISSN: 2356-1416, e-ISSN: 2442-9848
View My Stats