Islamic Theological Perspective on Pancasila Textbook in Higher Education
Abstract
Abstract
This reasearch aims to describe the reconstruction of the worldview of Islamic theology within the Pancasila course textbook used at Islamic institutes of higher education. The authors’ observation, research, and knowledge indicate that the majority of students taking compulsory subjects in both general and Islamic tertiary institutions tend to assume that there is no link between the teachings of Pancasila and the teachings of Islamic theology. On the contrary, according to the formulators of Pancasila and the founding fathers of Indonesia, Pancasila is an essence of religious teachings. For example, Soekarno explained that the reason for naming the nation's philosophy Pancasila was because it was inspired by the five pillars of Islam. This research is qualitative in nature by exploring and examining available data in more depth and detail. This type of research places emphasis on library research. Up to the present time, various findings and discussions seem to indicate that the virtuous theological values of Pancasila, with its many variants of scientific studies, are discussed and studied separately from the ‘life and death’ struggle of its theological concept throughout the history of Pancasila to become the nation’s philosophical foundation. Pancasila education has long been considered as a pure knowledge free from any practical involvement of its initiators. The theological concept of Pancasila, which later evolved to become part of subject material in Pancasila Education, demonstrated that it was, in fact, played a role in the zeitgeist, which caused quite a commotion stir during its formulation days.
Abstrak
Penelitian bertujuan untuk menggambarkan rekonstruksi pandangan dunia teologi Islam dalam buku ajar kursus Pancasila yang digunakan di lembaga pendidikan tinggi Islam. Pengamatan, penelitian, dan pengetahuan penulis menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas siswa yang mengambil mata pelajaran wajib di lembaga pendidikan umum dan Islam cenderung berasumsi bahwa tidak ada hubungan antara ajaran Pancasila dan ajaran teologi Islam. Sebaliknya, menurut perumus Pancasila dan para pendiri bangsa Indonesia, Pancasila adalah inti dari ajaran agama. Misalnya, Soekarno menjelaskan bahwa alasan penamaan filsafat bangsa Pancasila adalah karena ia terinspirasi oleh lima rukun Islam. Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif, dengan mengeksplorasi dan memeriksa data yang tersedia secara lebih mendalam dan terperinci. Jenis penelitian ini menekankan pada penelitian kepustakaan. Hingga saat ini, berbagai temuan dan diskusi tampaknya mengindikasikan bahwa nilai-nilai teologis Pancasila yang saleh, dengan banyak varian studi ilmiahnya, dibahas dan dipelajari secara terpisah dari perjuangan 'hidup dan mati' dari konsep teologisnya sepanjang sejarah Pancasila menjadi landasan filosofis bangsa. Pendidikan Pancasila telah lama dianggap sebagai pengetahuan murni yang bebas dari keterlibatan praktis penggagasnya. Konsep teologis Pancasila, yang kemudian berkembang menjadi bagian dari materi pelajaran dalam Pendidikan Pancasila, menunjukkan bahwa itu sebenarnya memainkan peran dalam zeitgeist, yang menyebabkan keributan yang cukup besar selama hari-hari perumusannya.
How to Cite: Khalimi., khaer, A. (2020). Islamic Theological Perspective on Pancasila Textbook in Higher Education. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 7 (1), 102-118. doi:10.15408/tjems.v7i1.16718.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amin, A. (1987). Islam from Time to Time. Bandung: CV. Rosda.
Arabi, Ibn. (1980). Book of Fushush al-Hikam, Abu al-Ali ‘Afifi (ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-A'Rabi.
Arif, S. (2018). “Pancasila Literacy for Political Islam,” Jakarta Newspaper, Wednesday, February 28.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). “Citizenship: The Construction of Indonesian Law,” Paper, for the Symposium Committee on Indonesia and Citizenship, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, October.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2018). “Ideas for the Establishment of Constitutional Assessment and Correctional Institutions,” paper, downloaded from www.jimly.com, accessed on April 12.
Azhary, M. Thahir. (1992). Country of Law. Jakarta: Star of the Month.
Azra, A., Thaha, I. (2002). Contemporary Islamic Historiography: Discourse, Actuality, and Acting History. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Azra, A., Thaha, I. (2010). “Understanding the History of the Friends,” in Fuad Jabali, Companions of the Prophet: Who, Where to and How? Bandung: Mizan.
Bahi, M. (1971). al-Dīn wa al-Dawlah min Tawjīhat al-Qur’ān al-Karīm. Bairut: Dār al-Fikr.
Bāqī, Mu'ammad Fuād 'Abd. (1992). Mu'jam Mufahras li al-Fāẓ al-Qur'ān al-Karīm. Bairut: Dār al-Fikr.
Bennett, W. L., Iyengar, S. (2008). “A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication,”: Journal of Communication, 58(4): 707-731.
Department of National Education-Central Languages. (2012). Indonesian Dictionary. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ecclestone, Kathryn., Goodley, D. (2016). “Political and Educational Springboard or Straitjacket? Theorising Post / Human Subjects in an Age of Vulnerability”, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, Vol. 37. No. 2: 175-188.
Fauzan, S. (2000). Al-Tauhid li al-Shaffil Awwal al-Aliy, trans. Agus Hasan Bashari. Jakarta: al-Shofwa Foundation.
Hashemi, N. (2009). Islam, Secularism, and Liberal Democracy: Toward a Democratic Theory for Muslim Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Holbert, R. L, K. Garrett, and L. S. Gleason, (2010). “A New Era of Minimal Effects? A Response to Bennett and Iyengar,” Journal of Communication, 60: 15–34.
Ibrahim, M. I. (1968). Mu'jam al-Alfāzh wa al-A'lām al-Qur’āniyyah. Qahira: Dar al-Fikr.
Karpf, D., Kreiss, D., Nielsen, R. (2013). “‘A New Era of Field Research in Political Communication?” Paper presented at the 2013 International Communication Association Annual Conference and forthcoming; ICA.
Kompas, 2010. Knitting Nusantara: Rindu Pancasila. Jakarta: Kompas Book Publisher, 2010.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970). “Book and Film Reviews: Revolutionary View of the History of Science: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” The Physics Teacher, Vol. 8. No. 2: 96-98.
Kuhn, Thomas S., (1970a). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Law No. 12 of 2012 on Institutes of Higher Education
Madjid, N. (1997). “The Concept of Justice in the Qur'an and the Possibility of Manifestation in the Context of Modern Times,” Serie KKA Paramadina, No. 35. III; 4.
Madjid, N. (1999). Islam of Modernity and Unity. Bandung: Mizan.
Ma'luf, L. (2007). al-Munjid fi al-Lughah wa al-A'lam. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-Syarqiyyah.
Munawar, R. Budhy. (ed.). 2011. Encyclopedia of Nurcholish Mosques: Islamic Thought on the Canvas of Civilization, A-G, Digital Edition. Jakarta: Democracy Project-Democracy Foundation,
Patrick, Thomas Y. (2016). The Zeitgeist of Secession Amidst the March Towards Unification: Scotland, Catalonia, and the Future of the European Union, BC Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 39 (1): 195.
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn bin Ḍiya al-Dīn Umar. (1981). Mafātiḥ al-Ghaib, Juz. 1. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn bin Ḍiya al-Dīn Umar. (1995). Tafsīr Fahr al-Rāzī al-Masyhūr Jalalain al-Rāzī, bi Tafsīr al-Kabīr wa Mafātih al-Ghaib. Volume XI. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Shihab, M. Q. (1996). The Qur'anic Insights: The Interpretation of Maudhu'i on Various Questions of Mankind. Bandung: Mizan.
Shihab, M. Q. (2007). The Qur'anic Encyclopedia: Vocabulary Study. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
Shihab, M. Q. (2009). Tafsir Al-Mishbah, Vol 15. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
Soekarno. (1965). Under the Flag of the Revolution, II. Jakarta: Panitya.
Syamsuddin, S. (2002). Muhammad Shahrur's Intratextuality Method in Al-Qur'an Interpretation, in Contemporary Al-Qur'an Study, New Discourse on Various Interpretation Methodologies. Yogyakarta: PT. Tiara Wacana Yogya (IKAPI Member).
Sya'rawi, M. M. (2005). Adalatullah: Justice and Hidayah Allah, trans. Ahsan Askan, Jakarta: Scholar.
Umar, N. (2014). When Jurisprudence Defends Women. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Wan Daud, Wan Mohd N. (2003). Philosophy of Islamic Education Practice Syed Muhammad Naquib. Al-Attas, (Terj) Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi. Et al. Bandung: Mizan.
Zakariyā, Abū al-Ḥusain. (1998). Mu'jam al-Muqāyis fī al-Lughah, Bairut: Dār al-Fikr li al-Tarbiyah wa al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzī.
Zarkasyi, H. F. (2015). Civilization as a Concept of Islamic Civilization, Tsaqafah, 11(1); 2.
Zuhayli, W. (1998). al-Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al-Aqīdah wa al-Syarī`ah wa al-Manhaj, Vol. 25. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-Mu`ashir.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v7i1.16718 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, p-ISSN: 2356-1416, e-ISSN: 2442-9848
View My Stats