Plagiarism Policy

JURNAL HARKAT • ORIGINALITY & RESEARCH INTEGRITY
Plagiarism Policy

Preventing plagiarism, inappropriate reuse, and misrepresentation of scholarly contributions.

Policy Statement

Jurnal Harkat: Media Komunikasi Gender is committed to originality, proper attribution, ethical authorship, and responsible scholarly publication.

The journal uses Turnitin or appropriate similarity-detection tools to support originality screening. In accordance with its Publication Ethics requirements, manuscripts must have a similarity score below 20%.

Similarity reports are evaluated by editors in context. Matching text does not automatically constitute plagiarism, and a score below the threshold does not establish the absence of plagiarism.

Turnitin Similarity Screening
<20% Required Similarity Score
Editorial Review Context-Based Assessment
1. Definition and Scope of Plagiarism

Plagiarism occurs when a person uses another individual's words, ideas, data, findings, images, methods, or other intellectual contributions without appropriate attribution, thereby misrepresenting their origin.

Plagiarism may occur regardless of whether the material was obtained from a journal, book, thesis, website, conference paper, report, unpublished manuscript, or another source.

Permission to reuse material does not remove the requirement for proper attribution. Reusing substantial portions of one's previously published work without appropriate disclosure may constitute inappropriate self-plagiarism or redundant publication.

2. Forms of Plagiarism and Improper Reuse
Direct PlagiarismCopying another source verbatim without quotation, acknowledgment, or proper citation.
Paraphrasing PlagiarismRestating another author's ideas or analysis without proper attribution.
Mosaic PlagiarismCombining improperly borrowed phrases and passages from multiple sources.
Translation PlagiarismTranslating another person's work and presenting it without proper acknowledgment.
Self-PlagiarismReusing substantial previously published content without disclosure or appropriate citation.
Data and Idea MisappropriationPresenting another researcher's findings, methods, or unpublished material as original.
3. Similarity Screening and Editorial Assessment

Manuscripts may be screened before peer review and, when necessary, during revision or before final publication.

  1. The Editorial Team evaluates the similarity report and identifies relevant matches.
  2. Similarity is assessed with consideration of citations, quoted material, methodology, reference lists, and the nature of the overlap.
  3. Manuscripts not meeting the stated similarity requirement may be returned for correction or rejected.
  4. Suspected plagiarism is examined in context using relevant evidence and appropriate author clarification.
  5. The Editorial Team determines proportionate action according to the severity and nature of the problem.
Important: The similarity percentage is not a direct measurement of plagiarism. Editorial evaluation must examine the actual content and circumstances of matching material.
4. Classification and Editorial Action
4.1 Minor Plagiarism

Limited unattributed text, such as a short sentence or paragraph, without substantial appropriation of original data, findings, or ideas.

Editorial Action: Written warning and a request for correction, proper attribution, or revision, where editorially appropriate.
4.2 Intermediate Plagiarism

Substantial unattributed passages, data, arguments, or findings taken from previously published or unpublished sources.

Editorial Action: Rejection of the submitted manuscript after confirmation of the material violation.
4.3 Severe Plagiarism

Extensive misappropriation of research findings, data, ideas, methods, or substantial portions of other scholarly work.

Editorial Action: Rejection and further research-integrity assessment. A restriction on future submissions may be considered following a documented, fair editorial decision and applicable procedures.
5. Plagiarism Identified After Publication

If plagiarism concerns arise after publication, the Editorial Team will evaluate relevant evidence, invite clarification where appropriate, and consider corrective action under the journal's publication-ethics procedures.

Depending on the seriousness and effect on the scholarly record, action may include a correction, Expression of Concern, retraction, or referral to the authors' institutions.

Retraction is intended to correct the scholarly record and must not be treated as an automatic penalty for minor attribution errors.

6. Responsibilities of Authors
  • Submit original and properly attributed scholarly work.
  • Use citations and quotation marks where appropriate.
  • Acknowledge sources of text, data, ideas, images, and research methods.
  • Disclose significant overlap with previously published or posted work.
  • Do not fabricate citations, references, or source documentation.
  • Review similarity reports and correct attribution issues responsibly.
  • Respond accurately to editorial inquiries concerning originality.
  • Ensure that AI-assisted material does not introduce plagiarism or invented sources.
Commitment to Academic Integrity

Jurnal Harkat requires proper acknowledgment of scholarly contributions and evaluates suspected plagiarism fairly, consistently, and on the basis of evidence rather than software percentages alone.

JURNAL HARKAT: MEDIA KOMUNIKASI GENDER
PSGA, LP2M UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta