STATING AND DEFENDING NEW KNOWLEDGE CLAIM: A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS ON THE DISCUSSION SECTION OF ENGLISH MASTER THESIS BY INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The discussion section is considered the most important section of a thesis but also the most difficult to write especially by university students. This study investigated the move-step and rhetorical pattern of discussion section in 20 English Master Theses written by Indonesian EFL postgraduate students. Following the model suggested by Loan and Pramoolsook (2015), this study found that students constructed the discussion section according to their perceived communicative purposes of discussion section. The most noticeable feature of the section is the occurrence of Move 2 (reporting results) and Move 4 (Commenting on results) occurring in all texts making them obligatory moves. In terms of step, interpreting results and referring to other studies in Move 4 are also considered as obligatory steps. The findings of this study are useful particularly for EFL students; that is to facilitate them to better understand the rhetorical structure of thesis discussion section when written in English.
ABSTRAK
Bagian pembahasan dianggap sebagai bagian yang paling penting dalam tesis tetapi juga yang paling sulit ditulis terutama oleh mahasiswa atau penulis baru. Penelitian ini penting untuk menyelidiki pola retorika bagian pembahasan tesis mahasiswa magister bahasa Inggris yang ditulis oleh mahasiswa Indonesia. Mengikuti model yang disarankan oleh Loan and Pramoolsook (2015), penelitian ini menemukan bahwa mahasiswa mengorganisir bagian pembahasan sesuai dengan tujuan komunikatif yang mereka anggap penting. Tujuan komunikatif yang paling menonjol dari bagian ini adalah ‘Move’ 2 (tahapan melaporkan hasil peneitian) dan ‘Move’ 4 (tahapan mengomentari hasil penelitian) yang ditemukan di semua teks sehingga dianggap wajib. Dalam hal langkah (Steps), langkah menafsirkan hasil penelitian dan langkah mengacu pada penelitian terdahuluan dalam ‘Move’ 4 dianggap sebagai langkah wajib. Temuan penelitian ini berguna terutama untuk mahasiswa magister bahasa Inggris, yaitu untuk memudahkan mereka memahami struktur retorika dari bagian pembahasan tesis yang ditulis dalam bahasa Inggris.
How to Cite: Wasito., Syah, S. A., Harahap, A. (2017). Stating and Defending New Knowledge Claim: a Rhetorical Analysis on the Discussion Section of English Master Thesis by Indonesian EFL Learners. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 4(2), 188-207. doi:10.15408/ijee.v4i2.6746
Keywords
References
Amirian, Z. et al (2008). Genre Analysis: An Investigation of the discussion Section of Applied Linguistics Research Articles. The Asian ESP Journal, Vol. 4 (1), 39-63.
Amnuai, W and Wannaruk, A. (2013. Investigating Move Structure of English Applied Linguistics Research Article Discussions Published in International and Thai Journals. In English Language Teaching; Vol. 6, No 2, 2013. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education.
Arsyad, Safnil. (2001). Rhetorical structure analysis of the Indonesian research articles. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Australian National University, Canberra Australia).
Arsyad, Safnil. (2013). A Genre-Based Analysis on Discussion Section of Research Articles in Indonesian Written by Indonesian Speakers International Journal of Linguistics, vol. 5, No. 4.
Basturkmen, Helen. (2012). A Genre-based Investigation of Discussion Sections of Research Articles in Dentistry and Disciplinary Variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
Chen, T.-Y., & Kuo, C.-H. (2012). A genre-based analysis of the information structure of master's theses in applied linguistics. The Asian ESP Journal, 8(1), 24-52
Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1994) ‘Genre Analysis: An Approach to Text Analysis for ESP’, in M. Coulthard (ed) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, pp:219-228.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1986) ‘Genre Analysis: An Investigation of the Introduction and Discussion Sections of MSc Dissertations, in M. Coulthard (ed.) Talking About Text, Birmingham U. K. English Language Research, Birmingham University, pp: 128-145.
Flowerdew, J. (1999). Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 123-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80125-8
Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to non-native speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 121-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587862
Holmes, Richard. (1997). Genre Analysis, and the Social Sciences: An Investigation of the Structure of RA Discussion Sections in Three Disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5 2013, Vol. 5, No. 4
Jaroongkhongdach, W., Todd, R. W., Keyuravong, S., & Hall, D. (2012). Differences in quality between Thai and international research articles in ELT. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 194-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.04.006
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269-292. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
Loan, N.T.T, & Pramoolsook, I (2015). Move Analysis of Results-Discussion Chapters in TESOL Master’s Theses Written by Vietnamese Students. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies – Vol. 21(2): 1 – 15
Parkinson, Jean. (2011). The Discussion Section as Argument: The Language Used to Prove Knowledge Claims. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 164-175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.001
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30, 479-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7 in Amnuai and Wannaruk (2013).
Pojanapunya, P., & Todd, R. W. (2011). Relevance of findings in results to discussion sections in applied linguistics research. Proceedings of the International Conference: Doing research in applied linguistics. King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi and Macquarie University.
Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139-160.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00001-5
Swales, John M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, in Safnil (2001). Rhetorical structure analysis of the Indonesian research articles. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Australian National University, Canberra Australia).
Swales, J. & Feak, C. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385.
DOI: 10.15408/ijee.v4i2.6746
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
