Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Moral Disengagement Remaja

Zukhrufi Aprilia, Solicha Solicha

Abstract


This research was conducted in order to know factors influencing moral disengangement
among adolescents. This research used quantitative approach with multiple regression
analysis as tool of study. Number of samples was 270 students of SMAN 6 Jakarta with nonprobability
sampling as technique. In this research tools of data collecting (Mechanisms of
Moral Disengangement Scale, The Measures of Life Attitudes Scale, Self-importance of Moral
Identity Scale, Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and The Multidimensional Multiattribution
Causality Scale (MMCS) was modified. The research showed that sex, trait
cynism, moral identity, emphaty and locus of control had significant influence toward moral
disengangement. Test of minor hypothesis was conducted and it showed that of four
individual characteristic only locus of control influenced toward moral disengangement
particularly chance and context dimensions of external locus of control and effort dimension of
internal locus of control, whereas trait cynism, internalization, emphatic concern scale,
perspective taking and internal locus of control (ability) had no impact on moral
disengangement. The research also showed that male students have higher moral
disengangement than female students.

Keywords


moral disengangement, sex, trait cynicism, moral identity, emphaty, locus of control

References


Kohlberg, L., & Gilligan, C. (1971). The Adolescent as A Philosopher: The Discovery of the Self in A Postconventional World. American Academy of Arts & Science, 100, 1051 – 1086.

McAlister, A. L., Bandura, A., & Owen, S. V. (2006). Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in Support of Military Force: The Impat of Sept. 11. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 141 – 165.

McFerran, B., Aquino, A., Duffy, M. (2010). How Personality and Moral Identity Relate to Individuals‟s Ethical Ideology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 35 – 56.

Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., Basker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2011). Why Employees do Bad Things: Moral Disengagement and Unethical Organizational Behavior. Journal Personnel Psychology, 65, 1– 48.

Mujahidah. (2012). Budaya Menyontek di Dunia Pendidikan. Diambil tanggal 5 Januari 2013 dari www.syariffathulhamdi.blogspot.com.

Nisa. (2009). Diktat Psikologi Eksperimen. Jakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Osofsky, M. J., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2005). The Role of Moral Disengagement in The Execution Process. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 371 – 393.

Reed, II., & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral Identity and The Expanding Circle of Moral Regard Toward Out-Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1270 – 1286.

Rosidi, R. (2009). Bimbingan Moral Remaja: Hakikat, Teori, Strategi dan Praktik. Diambil tanggal 5 Januari 2012 dariwww.yourlearningpartner.wordpress.com.

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement. Psyhological Monographs, 80, 1 – 28.

Santrock, J. W. Adolescene. Adolescene: Perkembangan Remaja. Shinto, B., Adelar., & Sherly, S. (terj.) 2003. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Shulman, E. P., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., & Fagan, J. (2011). Moral Disengagement among Serious Juvenile Offenders: A Longitudinal Study of The Relations between Morally Disengaged Attitudes and Offending. Developmental Psychology, 11, 1 - 14.

Trevino, K., & Nelson, K. A. (2011). Managing Business Ehtics: Straight Talk about How To Do It Right. United State of America: Courier Westford.

Wittmeyer, P. (2012). The Cynic Attitude. Retrieved on November 8, 2012

from http://www.michaelteachings.com/cynice_attitude.html.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/tazkiya.v18i1.9236

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.