Makna Tradisi Beseprah Erau Kutai Melalui Interaksi Simbolis dan Konstruksi Realitas Ritual

Authors

  • Saepullah Institut Ilmu Al-Quran (IIQ) Jakarta
  • Al Mukarromah Institut Ilmu Al-Quran (IIQ) Jakarta
  • Hanifah Jawahir Institut Ilmu Al-Quran (IIQ) Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v25i1.51419

Keywords:

Ritual Communication, Beseprah, Symbolic Interaction, Construction of Reality, Kutai Kartanegara

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the formation of shared meaning in the beseprah ritual within the Erau tradition of Kutai Kartanegara by applying the perspective of ritual communication theory, particularly through symbolic interaction and the construction of social reality. The research employs a qualitative approach with an interpretive case study design, using purposive and snowball sampling techniques to involve religious leaders, government officials, community figures, tourism ambassadors, and residents engaged in both the preparation and implementation of beseprah. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation, then analysed thematically through stages of transcription, coding, categorization, and interpretation focused on ritual symbols, interaction patterns, and participants’ experiences of meaning.The findings reveal that beseprah creates shared meaning about togetherness and equality through the spatial arrangement of face-to-face seating, the use of white cloth as a food mat, collective prayers, the gong struck by the Sultan, and the practice of communal dining without social status barriers. These symbolic interactions construct a social reality of closeness between leaders and the people, a collective identity as a harmonious and cooperative community, and the preservation of local culture, which today is also mediated through social media.The study concludes that the beseprah ritual functions as a space of ritual communication that sustains identity, social solidarity, and the imagination of an egalitarian society, while simultaneously enriching the study of ritual communication and Islamic communication rooted in local wisdom.

References

Azzuhdi, T. D. U. (2022). Nilai Karakter dalam Tradisi Beseprah Adat Erau Kutai dan Implementasinya pada Pembelajaran PAI. Borneo Journal of Islamic Education, 2(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.21093/bjie.v2i1.5567.

Carey, J. W. (2008). Communication as Culture, Revised Edition: Essays on Media and Society (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203928912

Cloudry, N. (2003). Media Ritual A Critical Approach. Routloudge.

Darma, M. E., & Masfufah, N. (2013). Kamus bahasa Kutai-bahasa Indonesia (Edisi pertama). Kantor Bahasa Provinsi Kalimantan Timur, Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Etriadi. (2025). Makna Saprahan Dalam Tradisi Melayu Sambas. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(3), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.58540/isihumor.v3i3.1001

Futaqi, S., & Yenuri, A. A. (2023). Ritual Communication in Learning Islam in Multi-Religious School. Journal of Islamic Education and Ethics, 1(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiee.v1i1.4

Hapsari, G. K. (2024). Makna Komunikasi Ritual Masyarakat Jawa (Studi Kasus pada Tradisi Perayaan Malam Satu Suro di Keraton Yogyakarta, Keraton Surakarta, dan Pura Mangkunegaran Solo). Faculty Social & Humaniora-Universitas Buddhi Dharma., Vol. 1, No. 1.

Hidayah, M. (2023). Makna Simbol Komunikasi Ritual Pada Tradisi Badudus Suku Banjar. Al-Hikmah Media Dakwah, Komunikasi, Sosial dan Kebudayaan, 14(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.32505/hikmah.v14i2.7384

Hidayat, R., Desi, E., & Mahda, M. (2025). Dari Tradisi ke Kohesi Sosial: Fungsi Sosial Halal Bihalal dalam Perspektif Merton. Kutubkhanah, 25(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.24014/kutubkhanah.v25i1.37383

Himam, M. M., & Dina, D. (2025). Beyond The Kitchen: The Socio-Religious Authority of Women in Javanese Slametan. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Keislaman, 14(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.35878/islamicreview.v14i1.1578

Ichsan, A. S. (2018). Memahami Struktur Sosial Keluarga Di Yogyakarta (Sebuah Analisa dalam Pendekatan Sosiologi: Struktural Fungsional). Jurnal Al Adyaan; Jurnal Sosial Dan Agama, 5(02), 153–166. https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/adyan/article/view/10016

Jannah, N. A. & Zainun. (2025). Interaksi Simbolik Budaya Pesta Tapai Masyarakat Pesisir Batu Bara dalam Menyambut Bulan Suci Ramadan Perspektif Komunikasi Islami. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 8(3), 4784–4797. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v8i3.48868

Magiman, M. M., Salleh, N., Abdullah, K., Latip, M., Abai, D. S. A., & Buang, F. (2021). Kajian Komunikasi Ritual dalam Makan Tahun Masyarakat Kadayan di Sarawak. ANP Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.53797/anp.jssh.v2i2.15.2021

Manafe, Y. D. (2011). Komunikasi Ritual pada Budaya Bertani Atoni Pah Meto di Timor-Nusa Tenggara Timur. Universitas Nusa Cendana Kupang, Vol.1, No.3.

Nasrul, N. (2024). Implementation of Talcott Parsons’ AGIL Scheme in Family and Community Education: A Case Study in the Era of Globalization. Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic and Interdisciplinary Studies, 3, 181–184.

Nofrianti, Y., Syamsir, S., Amanda, N., Salsabila, T., Alghiffari, H., Yudanur, R. M. Z., & Syahputra, M. A. (2024). Konflik Dan Integrasi Sosial Dalam Masyarakat Multikultural Di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Literatur. Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Humaniora, 2(7), 161–171.

Nurfadilah, N., Majid, A., & Muliadi, M. (2022). The Perspective of Ritual Communication in the Tradition of Childbirth in the Bugis Community in Talaka Village, Ma’rang District, Pangkajene Regency and Islands. Respon Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.33096/respon.v3i2.65

Prasetya, A., Nurdin, M. F., & Gunawan, W. (2021). Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Talcott Parsons di Era New Normal. SOSIETAS, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17509/sosietas.v11i1.36088

Puspitasari, D. D. A., & Rofiq, A. C. (2025). Ethnographic Study of Ritual Communication in the Slametan Punden Tradition in Duyung Village, Takeran District, Magetan Regency. International Journal of Applied and Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 3(7), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaamr.v3i7.61

Rothenbuhler, E. W. (1998). Ritual Communication: From Everyday Conversation to Mediated Ceremony. Sage Publications.

Soekanto, S. (1982). Sosiologi: Suatu Pengantar. Rajawali, Jakarta.

Tajima, Y., Okubo, S., Konno, T., Horiuchi, T., & Kobayashi, T. (2022). Sync Sofa: Sofa-type Side-by-side Communication Experience Based on Multimodal Expression. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 6961–6963. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503161.3547735

Tampubolon, H. (2024). Membungkus Makanan dalam Ritual (Partangiangan) sebagai Tindakan Simbolik Pendidikan Agama Kristen di Tanah Batak. Gorga: Journal of Constructive Theology, 1(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.62926/jct.v1i1.35

Tsaltsabilla, A., Amelia, L., Maharani, S., Cahyani, Y. A., & Purwanto, E. (2025). Ritual Digital: Bagaimana Media Sosial Mengubah Perayaan Tradisional. Indonesian Culture and Religion Issues, 2(3), 15–15. https://doi.org/10.47134/diksima.v2i3.208

Yenuri, A. A. (2022). S. AL HIKMAH: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Vol. 12, No.1.

Yenuri, A. A., & Aziz, I. N. (2022). Cross-Cultural Social Communication in Islamic Religious Education Learning of Elementary School. EDUCATIO : Journal Of Education, 1(2).

Yulianti, & Islami, A. N. (2021). Aktivitas Komunikasi Ritual Opat Belas Purnama: Studi Etnografi Komunikasi di Kasepuhan Cipinang. Jurnal Budaya Nusantara, 4(1), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.36456/JBN.vol4.no1.3257

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

Makna Tradisi Beseprah Erau Kutai Melalui Interaksi Simbolis dan Konstruksi Realitas Ritual. (2026). Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam, 25(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v25i1.51419