Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Author Guidelines

Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this journal. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected.

Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.

An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of quality. Before submitting, please ensure that the study design and research argument are structured and articulated properly. The title should be concise and the abstract should be able to stand on its own. This will increase the likelihood of reviewers agreeing to review the paper. When you're satisfied that your submission meets this standard, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.

 

Abstract

Abstracts are written with Apple Braille (11 pt) and preferably not more than 250 words. The abstract should be clear, concise, and descriptive. This abstract should provide a brief introduction to the problem, objective of the paper, followed by a statement regarding the methodology and a brief summary of results. Abstract should be written in Formal English, consist of: research purposes, main problems, method, findings, and conclusion. Abstract should be standalone means that there is no citation on Abstract. Abstract should directly explain the topic discussed. Abstract also should reflect the whole content of the manuscript/paper.

 

Keywords

3-5 keywords

 

Introduction

 

The Introduction part should contain at least five previous studies concerning the topic. At this point, the authorshould emphasize the urgency of the research, as well as the significance of the research. Authors also have to explore and combine some previous studies. It is important for readers to know the uniqueness, novelty, urgency, and significance of research. Most readers are non-native English speakers, therefore, authors should use a formal simple language, as well as, for international readers, authors also have to add and improve some global perspectives.

The introduction should be clear and provide the issue to be discussed in the manuscript. Before the objective, authors should provide an adequate background, and very short literature survey in order to record the existing solutions, to show which is the best of previous studies, to show the main limitation of the previous studies, to show what do you hope to achieve (to solve the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the paper.

Citation should be in the footnote model. The Authors have to use Mendeley citation software, and the citation model should be Chicago Manual Style 17th edition (Full Note) automatically by Mendeley. Authors should use at least 25 references (the latest in the past five years). The footnotes used in references in this journal are not only used as source credit for the reference, but it is highly recommended for the author to write some notes, arguments, or brief reviews in the footnotes. Thus, footnotes are not only limited to a reference source, but also notes from the author. At the end of the paragraph, the author/s should end with a comment on the significance concerning identification of the issue and objective of the research.

Minimum length of manuscript is 6000 words including footnote (exclude abstract and references). All submitted manuscripts are read by the editorial staff. Those manuscripts evaluated by editors to be inappropriate to journal criteria are rejected promptly without external review. Manuscripts evaluated to be of potential interest to our readership are sent to double blind reviewers. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer’s recommendation from among several possibilities: rejected, require major revision, need minor revision, or accepted. The Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Law and Legal Reform has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published.

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two or more experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board.

The Journal of Law and Legal Reform seeks to disseminate information and views on matters relating to law reform, including developments in case and statute law, as well as proposals for law reform, be they from formal law reform bodies or from other institutions or individuals. The Journal publishes articles, case and legislation notes and comments and reviews of books on law reform-related themes that offer insightful commentary on Indonesian and comparative law. It is published quarterly in January, April, July, and October. This law journal also promotes legal scholarship in its political, philosophical, and social contexts. The Journal of Law and Legal Reformhas a high commitment to respond and provide growing demand among scholars, legislators and practitioners of law in the private and public sectors for a forum for authoritative views on law reform in Indonesia, Asia and the World. A related purpose is to provide a systematic review of major initiatives for reform of laws and legal practice. The Journal of Law and Legal Reform publishes cutting-edge legal scholarship by both academics and legal practitioners. Established in 2019, the Journal finds its roots in a desire to propose constructive, well-reasoned reforms in all areas of the law.

The manuscript only consists of a maximum of 5 (five) authors, from minimum two different countries, and is highly recommended to do international collaboration (between countries). Authors can come from any circle, whether they are legal experts, legal practitioners, law scholars, researchers, the public, or students at the undergraduate, masters or doctoral levels.

The author is responsible for the readability of the manuscript and all writing errors. In certain cases, the editor will ask for valid proof from the author that the manuscript has been checked through a professional proof-reader.

 

 

Method

 

The method is written in descriptive form and should provide a statement regarding the methodology of the research. This method as much as possible gives an idea to the reader through the methods used. Both Research and Review Articles should explain the method. For the research article it is clear the method should describe the location of the study, the data collection method, and how the data were analyzed. Meanwhile, in the Review Article, the method is written descriptively regarding the topic being analyzed, what theories and laws are used to analyze the topic and the limitations of the study.

 

 

Result and Discussion

 

This section is the most important section of your article. The analysis or results of the research should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers.

 

Sub-Topic of Discussion

Following main headings should be provided in the manuscript while preparing. Tables and Figures are presented center and cited in the manuscript. The figures should be clearly readable and at least have a resolution of 300 DPI (Dots Per Inch) for good printing quality. Table made with the open model (without the vertical lines) as shown below:

 

TABLE 1. Cross Tabulation

 

Category Correctional Officer Performance Level

Total

Low

High

 

Level category

leadership style

 

Low

1

50%

1

50%

2

100%

High

0

0

18

100%

18

100%

Total

1

5%

19

95%

20

100%

Sources: Authors, 2021 (edited)

 

Sub-Topic of Discussion

 

Sub-Topic of Discussion

 

Sub-Topic of Discussion

 

 

Conclusion

 

Conclusion contains a description that should answer the objectives of research. Provide a clear and concise conclusion. Do not repeat the Abstract or simply describe the results of the research. Give a clear explanation regarding the possible application and/or suggestions related to the research findings.

 

 

References

 

Please automatically insert bibliography. The direct and valid link for all web pages or online news should be provided. Laws and Regulation can be written separately and manually (if the author has difficulty writing down the source of the laws and regulations using Mendeley). The source of the laws and regulations must be accompanied by the source link of the laws and the number of the state gazette. For journal articles, it must be accompanied by a valid DOI link, or if there is no DOI, it must include a link to the intended article.

 

Dwiyanti, Ita. “The Criminal Penalties for LGBT in a Human Rights Perspective.” Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15294/lsr.v1i1.49835.

Faisal, Sanapiah. Format Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2005.

Niravita, Aprila. “Social Injustice in the Industrial Revolution 4.0.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services1, no. 2 (2020): 164. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v1i2.36509.

Nugraheni, Prasasti Dyah. “The New Face of Cyberbullying in Indonesia: How Can We Provide Justice to the Victims?” The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education 3, no. 1 (2021): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v3i1.43153.

Pratiwi, Sahira Jati, Steven Steven, and Adinda Destaloka Putri Permatasari. “The Application of E-Court as an Effort to Modernize the Justice Administration in Indonesia: Challenges & Problems.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 2, no. 1 (2020): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v2i1.37718.

Rahmatika, Aulia Vaya. “Violence on Women and Children: Background, Effects, and Solutions.” Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review 1, no. 1 (2021): 69–86. https://doi.org/10.15294/lsr.v1i1.49840.

Raphael, Jody. Rape Is Rape: How Denial, Distortion, and Victim Blaming Are Fueling a Hidden Acquintance Rape Crisis. Chicago: Lawrence Hill Books, 2013.

Yulianto, Anggoro. “Cybersecurity Policy and Its Implementation in Indonesia.” Law Research Review Quarterly 7, no. 1 (2021): 69–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v7i1.43191 70.

 

Acknowledgment

Recognize those who helped in the research, especially funding supporters of your research. Include individuals who have assisted you in your study: Advisors, Financial support, or may other parties involved in the research.

 

Funding Information

Please provide funding information of the research

 

Conflicting Interest Statement

There is no conflict of interest in the publication of this article.

 

Publishing Ethical and Originality Statement

All authors declared that this work is original and has never been published in any form and in any media, nor is it under consideration for publication in any journal, and all sources cited in this work refer to the basic standards of scientific citation.

 

 

 

Submission Preparation Checklist

All submissions must meet the following requirements.

  • This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
  • All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
  • All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
  • Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.

 

Articles

Section default policy

 

 

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Submission Preparation Checklist

Submission Preparation

 

To ensure the quality of publications in the Jurnal of Legal Research, we have implemented several minimum standards that must be met by every prospective Author. Please independently verify whether the submitted manuscript meets the following minimum standards.

Guna memastiakn kualitas terbitan di Jurnal Opini Hukum, kami menerapkan beberapa standar minimal yang wajib dipenuhi oleh setiap calon Penulis. Silakan cek secara mandiri, apakah naskah yang dikirimkan sudah memenuhi standar minimal berikut ini.

 

Please check (√) the appropriate checkboxes based on the condition of the submitted manuscript. Include this information in a separate cover letter from the manuscript.

Isikan checkbox sesuai dengan kondisi naskah yang dikirimkan, buat dalam cover letter terpisah dengan naskah.

 

Items

Yes

No

Does the manuscript address legal topics, particularly focusing on legal reforms, both within Indonesia and in a global context?

Apakah topik naskah berkaitan dengan hukum, utamanya mengenai pembaharuan hukum baik di Indonesia maupun dalam konteks global

 

 

Is the minimum length of the manuscript at least 6000 words (excluding references)?

Apakah minimal panjang naskah sudah 6000 kata (tidak termasuk referensi)

 

 

Has the manuscript structure adhered to the journal's writing guidelines and utilized the latest article template?

Apakah struktur penulisan sudah merujuk ke pedoman penulisan jurnal dan menggunakan Template artikel terbaru?

 

 

Does the citation model utilize an automated referencing management system (e.g., Mendeley) and follow the Chicago Manual Style 17th edition (full note)?

Apakah model pengutipan menggunakan referencing management system secara otomatis (misalnya Mendeley), dan menggunakan model Chicago Manual Style 17th (full note)

 

 

Have the authors accurately provided the full names of all contributors, along with their respective ORCID links and official institutional email addresses?

Apakah penulis sudah mencantumkan nama penulis secara benar semuanya dan disertai dengan ORCID Link dan email resmi institusi tiap penulis?

 

 

In terms of authorship, has international collaboration been fulfilled with author diversity originating from at least two different countries?

Dalam hal kepengarangan, apakah kolaborasi internasional telah terpenuhi dengan diversitas penulis berasal dari sekurang-kurangnya 2 negara yang berbeda

 

 

Is the manuscript supported by an adequate number of references, with a minimum of 30 citations from reputable international journal articles within the last 5 years?

                              

Apakah naskah didukung dengan referensi yang cukup, sekurang-kurangnya 30 referensi dari artikel jurnal internasional bereputasi dalam 5 tahun terakhir

 

 

Is the manuscript written in proficient English, supported by a valid proofreading certificate from a professional?

Apakah naskah ditulis dengan bahasa Inggris yang memadai, dibuktikan dengan sertifikat proofread dari professional yang valid

 

 

Is the manuscript an original work by the authors, demonstrated by a similarity document (Turnitin) not more than 20%?

Apakah naskah asli karya dari penulis, dibuktikan dengan hasil uji kemiripan (Turnitin) tidak lebih dari 20%

 

 

 

 

Authors are also expected to provide suggested names for reviewers in their manuscript, with a minimum of 3 expert reviewers.

Penulis juga diharapkan memberikan usulan nama untuk reviewwer pada naskahnya, sekurang-kurangnya 3 orang reviewer pakar

 

List of proposed reviewers for this manuscript:

Daftar usulan reviewer untuk naskah ini

No

Full Name

Affiliation

Email

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

Please include this document in the cover letter when submitting the manuscript

Silakan sertakan dokumen ini pada cover letter yang disertakan saat penulis mengirimkan naskahnya.

 

Please provide a brief description, not exceeding 150 words, highlighting the manuscript's uniqueness, novelty, research findings, and why it deserves consideration for publication.

Silakan deskripsikan secara singkat maksimal 150 kata mengenai keunikan naskah, kebaruan naskah, temuan penelitian pada naskah, dan kenapa naskah ini layak dipertimbangkan untuk bisa dipublikasikan