Rational Adjudication in Diverse Society: Integrating Raz’s Philosophyof Authority in Indonesian Constitutional Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15408/jisi.v6i2.43900Keywords:
Joseph Raz, Philosophy of Authority, Constitutional Court, Rational Adjudication, Moral ConsiderationAbstract
Abstract. Constitutional courts in Indonesia play a crucial role in interpreting the Constitution and safeguarding democratic principles within a pluralistic society. Joseph Raz’s philosophy of authority can strengthen this judicial practice by emphasizing rational, ethical, and public-oriented adjudication. According to Raz, legitimate authority must prioritize public welfare and align with societal values, offering a relevant framework for constitutional interpretation. In the Indonesian context, where constitutional decisions significantly impact a diverse society, Raz’s thought assists judges in navigating complex social and cultural dynamics with a reasoned and ethical approach. This philosophy is particularly relevant in addressing conflicts between legal texts and religious or cultural norms, while supporting purposive and inclusive legal interpretation. Raz’s principles advocate for a holistic approach that combines textual analysis with ethical considerations, enabling judges to formulate decisions that uphold justice and democracy. By adopting this framework, constitutional courts can become more responsive to societal needs, strengthen democratic governance, and produce decisions that address contemporary issues in Indonesia. This approach ensures judicial independence while fostering equitable and context-sensitive rulings that align with the country’s constitutional mandate and the pluralistic nature of its society.
Keywords: Joseph Raz, Philosophy of Authority, Constitutional Court, Rational Adjudication, Moral Consideration.
Abstrak. Peradilan konstitusional di Indonesia memainkan peran penting dalam menafsirkan Konstitusi dan menjaga prinsip demokrasi dalam masyarakat pluralistik. Filosofi otoritas Joseph Raz dapat memperkuat praktik peradilan ini melalui penekanan pada ajudikasi yang rasional, etis, dan berorientasi pada kepentingan publik. Menurut Raz, otoritas yang sah harus memprioritaskan kesejahteraan masyarakat dan sejalan dengan nilai-nilai sosial, sehingga menawarkan kerangka kerja yang relevan untuk interpretasi konstitusional. Dalam konteks Indonesia, di mana keputusan konstitusional berdampak luas pada masyarakat yang beragam, pemikiran Raz membantu hakim menghadapi kompleksitas sosial dan budaya dengan pendekatan berbasis alasan dan etika. Filosofi ini relevan untuk mengatasi benturan antara teks hukum dengan norma agama dan budaya, serta mendukung interpretasi hukum yang purposif dan inklusif. Prinsip Raz mendorong pendekatan holistik yang menggabungkan analisis tekstual dan pertimbangan etis, memungkinkan hakim untuk merumuskan keputusan yang mendukung keadilan dan demokrasi. Dengan mengadopsi kerangka ini, peradilan konstitusional dapat lebih responsif terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat, memperkuat tata kelola demokratis, dan menghasilkan keputusan yang relevan dengan isu-isu kontemporer di Indonesia.
Kata Kunci: Joseph Raz, Filsafat Otoritas, Peradilan Konstitusional, Ajudikasi Rasional, Pertimbangan Moral
Downloads
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Pokok-pokok hukum tata negara Indonesia pasca reformasi. PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Bedner, A. (2011). Judicial independence and democratic transition in Indonesia. Law & Social Inquiry, 36(2), 245–274.
Bello Hutt, D. (2022). Rule of law and political representation. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-021-00163-5
Bossacoma Busquets, P. (2020). Constitutional right to secede and constitutional reform. In Morality and legality of secession: Federalism and internal conflicts. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26589-2_8
Bustamante, T., de Matos, S., & Coelho, A. L. S. (Eds.). (2023). Law, morality and judicial reasoning (Law and Philosophy Library, Vol. 147). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61879-6
Butt, S. (2015). The Constitutional Court and democracy in Indonesia. Brill.
Chia, E. A. (2023). Hart, Raz and Kelsen on the puzzle of law’s autonomy. In J. M. A. Linhares & M. Atienza (Eds.), Human dignity and the autonomy of law (Law and Visual Jurisprudence, Vol. 7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14824-8_5
Cremades, J., & Hermida, C. (Eds.). (2023). Encyclopedia of contemporary constitutionalism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_51-1
Dajović, G. (2023). Rule of recognition and constitution. In M. Sellers & S. Kirste (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_378
Davies, M. (2024). Legal pluralism and the limits of law. Res Publica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-024-09697-5
Edlin, D. E. (2016). Common law judging: Subjectivity, impartiality, and the making of law. University of Michigan Press.
Ehrenberg, K. M. (2023). Inclusive legal positivism and the fallibility of officials. In T. Bustamante et al. (Eds.), Law, morality and judicial reasoning (Vol. 147). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61879-6_3
Etchemendy, M. X. (2023). Philosophy of law: The naturalistic approach. In M. Sellers & S. Kirste (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_742
Garcia-Godinez, M. (2023). The institutionalisation of the basic validity rule. Law and Philosophy, 42, 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-022-09453-x
Giudice, M. (2024). Systematicity of law. In M. Sellers & S. Kirste (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_1112-1
Harding, A., & Nicholson, P. (2010). New courts in Asia. Routledge.
Held, V. (1984). Rights and goods: Justifying social action. Free Press.
Hermida del Llano, C. (2023). Democracy and rule of law. In J. Cremades & C. Hermida (Eds.), Encyclopedia of contemporary constitutionalism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_47-1
Ingole, A. (2024). The concept of rights. In S. S. Jodhka & B. Rehbein (Eds.), Global handbook of inequality. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32152-8_1
Kingsbury, D. (2005). The politics of Indonesia. Oxford University Press.
Lane, M. (2008). Unfinished nation: Indonesia before and after Suharto. Verso.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy. Yale University Press.
Lindsey, T. (2008). Indonesia: Law and society. Federation Press.
Linhares, J. M. A., & Atienza, M. (Eds.). (2023). Human dignity and the autonomy of law. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14824-8_5
Manero, J. R. (2023). Postpositivist legal theory. In M. Sellers & S. Kirste (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_349
Morales-Zúñiga, H. A. (2023). Legal methods: Statutory interpretation – The argument from intention. In M. Sellers & S. Kirste (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_822
Pilich, M. (2021). Disobedience of judges as a problem of legal philosophy and comparative constitutionalism: A Polish case. Res Publica, 27, 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-021-09501-8
Pompe, S. (2005). The Indonesian Supreme Court: A study of institutional collapse. Cornell University Press.
Raz, J. (1979). The authority of law. Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (1985). Authority, law, and morality. The Monist, 68(3), 295–324.
Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (1990). Facing diversity: The case of epistemic abstinence. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19(1), 3–46.
Raz, J. (1994). Ethics in the public domain. Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (2009). Between authority and interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (2022). The roots of normativity. Oxford University Press.
Ródenas, Á. (2023). Defeasibility in law. In M. Sellers & S. Kirste (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_347
Samsudin, M. I. (2022). A comparison of judicial review in Indonesian Constitutional Court and French Constitutional Council. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 5(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v5i1.15127
Schiavello, A. (2023). Legal science: Analytical conceptions. In M. Sellers & S. Kirste (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_358
Sellers, M., & Kirste, S. (Eds.). (2023). Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1
Shecaira, F. P. (2024). Waluchow on reasoning with the morality of the community. In Law, morality and judicial reasoning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61879-6_12
Silalahi, A. D. (2022). The framework of law impacts in philosophy of law and justice. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Nusantara Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.409434
Silalahi, A. D. (2024). Some debates of hermeneutic and legal interpretation. Mimbar Hukum, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v36i1.9493
Steuer, M. (2023). Rule of law – The concept. In J. Cremades & C. Hermida (Eds.), Encyclopedia of contemporary constitutionalism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_51-1
Stone, A. (2008). Judicial review and democracy. Oxford University Press.
Tan, K. Y. L. (2020). Constitutional law in Indonesia. Wolters Kluwer.
Wacks, R. (2006). Philosophy of law: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Wacks, R. (2008). Law: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Wacks, R. (2012). Understanding jurisprudence (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Artha Debora Silalahi, Rizal Mustansyir, Sindung Tjahyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
