Muslim Youth Religiosity: in Terms of Gender Differences and Educational Environment

Warsiyah Warsiyah

Abstract


Abstract

This study aims to determine differences in the religiosity of Muslim adolescents regarding differences in the educational environment and gender. Data analysis was performed by the score collected by questionnaire, which was developed to measure the level of adolescent religiosity consisting of four dimensions: faith, intellectual, ritual and social. The study involved 97 Muslim teenagers taken random cluster sampling from an affordable population of students studying at SMA N and MA in Simo district Boyolali district. The results showed that subject scores varied and were above the theoretical averages, indicating that Muslim youth in Simo had a high degree of religiosity. The result of t-test analysis shows that there is a difference of religiosity level between adolescents studying in heterogeneous and homogenous institutions. The value of t-count is 2,668 bigger than t criterion (t-Table = 2.010) at 5% significance level.


Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan dalam religiusitas remaja Muslim dalam hal perbedaan di lingkungan pendidikan dan jenis kelamin. Analisis data dilakukan berdasarkan skor yang dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner, yang dikembangkan untuk mengukur tingkat religiusitas remaja yang terdiri dari empat dimensi: iman, intelektual, ritual dan sosial. Penelitian ini melibatkan 97 remaja Muslim yang diambil melalui tehnik sampel gugus (cluster random sampling) dari populasi siswa yang belajar di Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri dan Madrasah Aliyah di Kecamatan Simo, Kabupaten Boyolali. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa skor subjek bervariasi dan berada di atas rata-rata teoritis, menunjukkan bahwa pemuda Muslim di Simo memiliki tingkat religiusitas yang tinggi. Hasil analisis uji-t menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan tingkat religiusitas antara remaja yang belajar di lembaga-lembaga yang heterogen dan remaja yang belajar di lembaga-lembaga yang homogen. Nilai t-count adalah 2.668 lebih besar dari kriteria t (t-Tabel = 2.010) pada tingkat signifikansi 5%.


How to Cite : Warsiyah. (2018).  Muslim Youth Religiosity: With the References of Gender Differences and Educational Environment. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 5(1), 19-29. doi:10.15408/tjems.v5i1.7842.


Keywords


Environmental Education; Religiosity; Gender; Muslims Young;Lingkungan Pendidikan; religiusitas; Jenis kelamin; Pemuda Muslim

Full Text:

PDF

References


Batson, C. Daniel & W. Larry Ventis. (1982). The Religious Experience: A Social Psychological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

Daradjat, Z. (2005). Ilmu Jiwa Agama. ed. 17. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Fakih, M. (1996). Menggeser Konsepsi Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Feltey, Kathryn M. dan Margaret M. Poloma, “From sex differences to gender role beliefs: Exploring effects on six dimensions of religiosity,” Sex Roles 25, no. 3 (1 Agustus 1991): 181–93, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289853.

Glock, C.Y. & R. Stark. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Glock, C.Y. (1962). “On the Study of Religious Commitment,” Review of Recent Research on Religion and Character Formation (Research supplement to Religious Education, July-August 1962); 98-110.

Hadjar, I. (2010). Prasangka Keagamaan. Semarang: Walisongo Press.

Hadjar, I. (1999). Dasar-dasar Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Hadjar, I. (2014). Dasar-dasar Statistik untuk Ilmu Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora. Semarang : Pustaka Zaman.

Hasbullah. (2015).Dasar-dasar Ilmu Pendidikan. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.

Hill, Peter C., Ralph W. Hood (Ed.). (1999). Measure of Religiosity. Birmingham: Religious Education Press.

Laura B. Koenig et al. (2005) “Genetic and Environmental Influences on Religiousness: Findings for Retrospective and Current Religiousness Ratings,” Journal of Personality 73, no. 2: 471–88, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00316.x.

Miller, Alan S., John P. Hoffmann, “Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34, no. 1 (Maret 1995): 63, https://doi.org/10.2307/1386523.

Murwani, R. Santoso. (1999). Statistika Terapan (Teknik Analisis Data). Jakarta: PPS UNJ

Nashori, F., Diana, R. (2002). Mengembangkan Kreativitas Dalam Perspektif Psikologi Islam. Yogyakarta: Menara Kudus.

Nafis, dkk. (1995). Religiusitas Masyarakat Muslim Kodia Semarang. Semarang: Pusat Penelitian IAIN Walisongo Semarang.

Octarini, F. C. (2008). Hubungan Religiusitas dengan Berpikir Positif pada Remaja Putri. Skripsi: UII Yogyakarta.

Rachmat, J. (2003). Psikologi Agama. Bandung: Mizan

Rumini, S., Sundari, S. (2004). Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja, Jakarta : PT. Rineke Cipta.

Santrock, John W. (2006). Life-span development. 10th ed, Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill.

Smith, C. (2003). Theorizing Religious Effects Among American Adolescent. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42, no. 1: 17–30.

Stark, R. (2002). “Physiology and Faith: Addressing the ‘Universal’ Gender Difference in Religious Commitment,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41, no. 3: 495–507, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906.00133.

Udry, J. Richard. (1994) “The Nature of Gender,” Demography 31, no. 4: 561, https://doi.org/10.2307/2061790.

Vaus, David de, dan Ian McAllister. (1987). Gender Differences in Religion: A Test of the Structural Location Theory. American Sociological Review 52, no. 4: 472–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095292.

Warsiyah. (2014). Menyontek, Prokrastinasi dan Keimanan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v5i1.7842 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, p-ISSN: 2356-1416, e-ISSN: 2442-9848

View My Stats