Investigating Neoliberal Values in EFL Textbooks in Indonesia
Abstract
Abstract
There has been a wide acknowledgment that textbooks are a common medium of classroom instruction. Simulatenously, a growing body of research have found that ELT textbooks have promoted certain ideology, namely neoliberalism. This study concerns the endorsement of neoliberalism and how it is embedded in both locally-developed and internatonally-published ELT textbooks used in Indonesia. Using content analysis, the finding reveals that all the chosen textbooks contain the neoliberal mentality. The mandatory local textbook focuses on how to promote competition, while the local private textbook highlights material wealth and competition. On the other hand, the imported global textbook endorses human capital agenda. In other words, each textbook endorses different neoliberal values. The findings in this study imply the need for critical reading before the textbooks are prescribed to be used especially when the potential readers of the textbooks have different cultural values and learning objectives than those of commonly reproduced neoliberal values in imported ELT textbooks as previous studies found.
Abstrak
Tidak dapat dipungkiri bahwa buku sebagai bahan ajar telah menjadi media paling populer dalam kegiatan ajar-mengajar di kelas. Penelitian sebelumnya juga menemukan bahwa buku ajar bahasa Inggris telah menjadi media untuk menyebarkan ideologi, salah satunya yaitu neoloberalisme. Oleh karena itu, studi ini bertujuan untuk meneliti adanya ideologi neoliberalisme dan bagaimana ideologi tersebut direpresentasikan dalam buku ajar bahasa Inggris baik yang diproduksi secara lokal maupun impor. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan konten analisis, studi ini menemukan bahwa dalam buku bahan ajar bahasa Inggris, terdapat nilai-nilai ideologi neoliberalisme. Buku bahan ajar wajib nasional berfokus pada glorifikasi kompetisi. Sedangkan buku bahan ajar domestik yang lain mementingkan kekayaan materi dan kompetisi. Di sisi lain, buku bahan ajar bahasa Inggris impor lebih menonjolkan human capital sebagai nilai neoliberalismenya. Melihat temuan tersebut, diperlukan critical reading sebelum suatu buku direkomendasikan untuk dijadikan bahan ajar terutama ketika target pengguna buku tersebut memiliki budaya dan juga nilai-nilai ideologi yang berbeda dari ideologi yang, menurut penelitian sebelumnya, kerap kali direproduksi dalam buku ajar bahasa Inggris, yaitu neoliberalisme.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Babaii, E., & Sheikhi, M. (2018). Traces of neoliberalism in English teaching materials: A critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1398671
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Fitz, C. C., Alizaga, N. M., & Zucker, A. N. (2015). Tracking homo oeconomicus: Development of the neoliberal beliefs inventory. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i1.366
Bori, P. (2020a). Neoliberal governmentality in global English textbooks. Classroom Discourse, 11(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.1755327
Bori, P. (2020b). Neoliberalism and global textbooks: A critical ethnography of English language classrooms in Serbia. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1797082
Campbell, R., Metcalf, R., & Benne, R. R. (n.d.). A2+ Students Book Pack Beyond. Macmillan.
Cantoni, D., Y. Chen, D., Y. Yang, Yuchtman, N., & Zhang, Y. Z. (2017). Curriculum and ideology. Journal of Political Economy, 125(2), 338–392.
Copley, K. (2018). Neoliberalism and ELT coursebook content. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1318664
Daghigh, A. J., & Rahim, H. A. (2020). Neoliberalism in ELT textbooks: An analysis of locally developed and imported textbooks used in Malaysia. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1755888
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (Second Ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315549354-11
Gray, J., & Block, D. (2014). All middle class now? Evolving representations of the working class in the neoliberal era: The case of ELT textbooks. In Nigel. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production (pp. 45–71). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276285
Gray, John. (2010). The branding of English and the culture of the new capitalism: Representations of the world of work in English language textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 714–733. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq034
Harwood, N. (2014). Content, consumption, and production: Three levels of textbook research. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English Language Teaching Textbooks: Content, Consumption, and Production (pp. 1–44). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276285_1
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Littler, J. (2013). Meritocracy as plutocracy: The marketising of ‘equality’ under neoliberalism. Neoliberal Culture, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.3898/newf.80/81.03.2013
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n12
Mirhosseini, S. A. (2018). Issues of ideology in English language education worldwide: An overview. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 26(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2017.1318415
Taki, S. (2008). International and local curricula: The question of ideology. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807084503
Talbot, M. (Ed.). (2019). Language and power in the modern world. Edinburgh University Press.
Tileaga, C. (2011). Discourse , Dominance and Power Relations To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-00571863. HAL, 6(4), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796806070719
Wachidah, S., Gunawan, A., & Diyantari. (2018). Bahasa Inggris think globally act locally (Y. Farlina (Ed.)). Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.
Xiong, T., & Yuan, Z. min. (2018). “It was because I could speak English that I got the job”: Neoliberal discourse in a Chinese English textbook series. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 17(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2017.1407655
Xu, S. (2019). Ideology and politics in junior-secondary Chinese history textbooks: Comparing two versions published in the 21st century. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1633513
Zaida, N. (2018). Bright: An English course for junior high school students (T. Utami & D. W. Priyanto (Eds.)). Erlangga.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v9i2.31922 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, p-ISSN: 2356-1416, e-ISSN: 2442-9848
View My Stats