An Evaluation to Predict the Probability of Success of Student-Centered Learning in Business School

Taridi Kasbi Ridho, Fitri Yani Jalil

Abstract


Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation of student-centered learning, to evaluate its effectiveness and to predict the possibility of success of it in a business school of the Faculty of Economics and Business of Universitas Islam Negeri (State Islamic University) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. A number of questioners were distributed to lecturers and students who experienced in using this method, followed by focused group discussions and in-depth interviews. Results showed that piloting three student-centered learning methods, i.e. learning by case method, project market research, and gamification at the faculty was welcomed by both students and lecturers as they have taken many advantages from it. They gained deeper and wider knowledge. They could improve their critical and creativity thinking, be more independent, responsible, confidence, courage and had better engagement and dedication to learning process, a set of skills required to be successful after graduation. However, challenges to make this new pedagogy method to be fun, easy to understand and deliver optimum result still remained. This paper contributed to improvement of human resources in the private sector especially in emerging countries by showing that applying right pedagogical method together with multi aspects improvement from lecturers, students, and physical infrastructures will enable business school graduates to fulfill the needs and challenges of current and future business world.

Abstrak

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan implementasi pembelajaran yang berpusat pada siswa, mengevaluasi keefektifannya dan memprediksi kemungkinan keberhasilannya di sekolah bisnis Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif. Hidayatullah Jakarta. Sejumlah kuesioner dibagikan kepada dosen dan mahasiswa yang berpengalaman menggunakan metode ini, dilanjutkan dengan diskusi kelompok terfokus dan wawancara mendalam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa percontohan tiga metode pembelajaran yang berpusat pada siswa, yaitu pembelajaran dengan metode kasus, riset pasar proyek, dan gamifikasi di fakultas disambut baik oleh mahasiswa dan dosen karena mereka telah mengambil banyak keuntungan darinya. Mereka mendapatkan pengetahuan yang lebih dalam dan lebih luas. Mereka dapat meningkatkan pemikiran kritis dan kreativitas mereka, menjadi lebih mandiri, bertanggung jawab, percaya diri, berani dan memiliki keterlibatan dan dedikasi yang lebih baik dalam proses pembelajaran, seperangkat keterampilan yang dibutuhkan untuk sukses setelah lulus. Namun, tantangan untuk menjadikan metode pedagogi baru ini menyenangkan, mudah dipahami dan memberikan hasil yang optimal masih ada. Makalah ini berkontribusi pada peningkatan sumber daya manusia di sektor swasta terutama di negara-negara berkembang dengan menunjukkan bahwa menerapkan metode pedagogis yang tepat bersama dengan peningkatan multi aspek dari dosen, mahasiswa, dan infrastruktur fisik akan memungkinkan lulusan sekolah bisnis untuk memenuhi kebutuhan dan tantangan saat ini dan dunia bisnis masa depan

 

How to Cite Ridho, T. K., Jalil, F. Y. (2022). An Evaluation to Predict the Probability of Success of Student-Centered Learning in Business School. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 9(2), 93-104. doi:10.15408/tjems.v9i1.23189.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Attard, A., E. Di Iorio, E., Geven, K., and Santa, R., 2010. Student-Centered Learning: Toolkit for Students, Staff and Higher Education Institutions. Berlin: The European Students Union

Blackie, M., Case, J., and Jawitz, J., 2010. Student-Centredness: The Link Between Transforming Students and Transforming Ourselves. Teaching in Higher Education, 15:6, 637-646. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2010.491910

Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R. (eds.), 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Brush, T., and Saye, J. 2000. Implementation and Evaluation of a Student-Centered Learning Unit: A Case Study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), pp. 79–100.

Edwards, R., 2001. Meeting Individual Learner Needs: Power, Subject, Subjection. In C. Paechter, M. Preedy, D. Scott, and J. Soler (Eds.), Knowledge, Power and Learning, London: SAGE

Elen, J., Clarebout, G., Leonard, R., and Lowyck, J., 2007. Student-Centred and Teacher-Centred Learning Environments: What Students Think. Teaching in Higher Education 12 (1): pp. 105–117.

Geven, K., and Santa, R., 2010. Student-Centered Learning: Survey Analysis Time for Student Centred Learning. Bucharest: European Students Union. http://www.esib.org/index.php/Publications.

Gilis, A., Clement, M., Laga L., and Pauwels P., 2008. Establishing a Competence Profile for the Role of Student-Centred Teachers in Higher Education in Belgium. Research in Higher Education 9 (6): pp 531–554.

Grossman, T., Mehrotra, V., and Sidaoui, M., 2016. A Student-Centered Approach to the Business School Management Science Course. INFORMS Transactions on Education 16(2):42-53.

Guest, R., 2005. Will Flexible Learning Raise Student Achievement? Education Economics 13 (3): pp. 287–297.

Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., Land, S. M., and Lee, E., 2014. Student-centered, open learning environments: Research, theory, and practice. In M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 641–651). New York: Springer.

Hubbard, G., 2019. “The Real Value of Business Schools”, BizEd Magazine March/April 2019

Erasmus and Programme of the European Union. 2019. Indoped, Evaluation of Practises Work Package 3 Final Report

Kember, D. 2009. Promoting Student-centered Forms of Learning Across an Entire University. Higher Education 58 (1): pp 1–13.

Lee, E. and Hannafin, M., 2016. A Design Framework for Enhancing Engagement in Student-Centered Learning: Own It, Learn It, and Share It, Education Tech Research Development vol 64: pp 707–734.

Kairisto-Mertanen, L., Budiono, T., (eds), 2019. INDOPED – Modernising Indonesian Higher Education with Tested European Pedagogical Practices Report on Piloted Pedagogical Practices, Turku University of Applied Sciences.

Maclellan, E., 2008. The Significance of Motivation in Student-Centred Learning: A Reflective Case Study. Teaching in Higher Education 13 (4): pp. 411–421.

McCabe, A. and O’Connor, U., 2014. Student-Centred Learning: The Role and Responsibility of the Lecturer, Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 350–359

O’Neill, G. and McMahon, T. 2005. Student–Centred Learning: What Does It Mean for Students and Lecturers? in Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching. G. O’Neill, S. Moore, B. McMullin (eds). AISHE, 2005.

QS World University Ranking. 2020. https://www.topuniversities.com/

Vinichenko, M., Ridho, T., Karacsony, P., Li, N., Narrainen, G., Сhulanova, O.. 2019. The Feasibility and Expediency of Gamification Activities in Higher Education, International Journal of Education and Practice. 2019 Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 459-468

Walsh, A. 2005. The Tutor in Problem Based Learning: A Novice’s Guide. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University, Faculty of Health Science.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v9i1.23189 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, p-ISSN: 2356-1416, e-ISSN: 2442-9848

View My Stats