Do Faculty and Gender Matter to Students’ English Proficiency Score?

Siti Nurul Azkiyah



It is undeniable that English is an important international language and there could be some background variables influencing English proficiency. Therefore, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta as the context of the study regulates that all students take an English proficiency test once they are accepted and must achieve 450 for non-English departments and 500 for English studies before they graduate. Having 12 faculties of Islamic and non-Islamic studies, it is interesting to measure whether faculty as a background variable matters. In addition, female as another background variable has been widely found to have better achievement in language, and therefore this study is also intended to investigate whether gender is a contributing factor to students’ English proficiency. The population was all students of UIN Jakarta year 2017, which data of 5089 students’ English proficiency scores, faculties, and gender were collected through the information technology center. The descriptive analysis reveals that the lowest score is 240 while that highest one is 570 and the mean score is 383. The ANOVA analysis reports significant differences among faculties: the Faculty of Medicine achieves the highest score (M = 429) while the Faculty of Ushuluddin attains the lowest (M = 365). In addition, female students, as yielded by t-test analysis, are found to have significantly higher English proficiency score. The findings implies the need to pay more attention to Islamic-related faculties having lower scores and to consider English proficiency score as an enrolment requirement especially for the faculty of Medicine.



Tidak bisa dipungkiri bahwa Bahasa Inggris sangat penting dan ada beberapa faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap kecapakan berbahasa Inggris. Oleh karena itu, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta sebagai konteks studi ini mewajibkan semua mahasiswa yang diterima untuk mengikuti tes kecakapan berbahasa Inggrisd dan harus mencapai skor 450 untuk mahasiswa di luar prodi Bahasa Inggris dan 500 untuk prodi Bahasa Inggris sebelum mereka lulus. Dengan 12 fakultas baik studi Islam maupun non-Islam, menjadi menarik untuk melihat apakah fakultas sebagai sebuah variabel memiliki pengaruh. Selain itu, jender (perempuan) sebagai variabel lain sudah banyak ditemukan oleh studi lain memiliki prestasi yang lebih unggul dalam kecakapan berbahasa, dan oleh karena itu studi ini juga bertujuan untuk mengukur apakah gender merupakah faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap kecapakan berbahasa Inggris. Populasi studi ini adalah mahasiswa UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta angkatan 2017, di mana data skor English Proficiency Test, asal fakultas dan jender sejumlah 5089 mahasiswa berhasil dikumpulkan dan Pustipanda. Dari analisis deskriptif statistik ditemukan bahwa skor terendah adalah 240 sedangkan tertinggi adalah 570 dan nilai rata-ratanya sebesar 383. Hasil analisis ANOVA menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan diantara fakultas, di mana Fakultas Kedokteran memiliki nilai rata-rata tertinggi (429) sementara Fakultas Ushuluddin memiliki nilai rata-rata terendah (365). Mahasiswa (perempuan), sebagaimana ditunjukkan oleh hasil analisis t-test, memiliki nilai rata-rata yang secara signifikan lebih tinggi dibanding mahasiswa (laki-laki).

How to Cite : Azkiyah, S.,N. (2018).  Do Faculty and Gender Matter to Students’ English Proficiency Score?. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 5(2), 116-125. doi:10.15408/tjems.v5i2.1667.


tes kecakapan berbahasa inggris; classroom talk; pattern of interaction; scientific literacy; primary science; science education ; variabel latar belakang; faktor kontribusi; fakultas; gender

Full Text:



Al-Mously, N. (2014). The impact of admission criteria and English proficiency on medical students' academic performance in the pre-clinical phase. Proceedings of International Academic Conferences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, Istanbul, April 13, 2014.

Azkiyah, S.N. (2017). Educational Effectiveness Research as the Knowledge Base of Improving Education. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 25 (3), 1019-1038.

Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1349–1362.doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.021.

Carhill, A., Suarez-Orozco, C., &Paez, M. (2008). Explaining English Language Proficiency among Adolescent Immigrant Students. American Educational Research Journal45, 1155-1179.

Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K. & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Difference, 36,1907-1920.

Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Główka, D. (2014). The impact of gender on attainment in learning English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4 (4), 617-635.

Hughes, Arthur. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Kaliyadan, F., Thalamkandathil, N., Parupalli, S.R., Amin, T.T., Balaha, M.H., Al Bu Ali, W.H. (2015). English language proficiency and academic performance: A study of a medical preparatory year program in Saudi Arabia. Avicenna Journal of Medicine, 5 (4), 140-144.

Kane, T.J., Taylor, E.S., Tyler, J.H. & Wooten, A.L. (2010). Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data. The Journal of Human Resources 46(3), 587 – 613.

Leaver, B. L., &Shekhtman, B. (Eds.). (2002). Developing professional-level language proficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Li, G., Chen, W., &Duanmu, J-L. (2010). Determinants of international students’ academic performance: A comparison between Chinese and other international students. Journal ofStudies in International Education, 14, 389-405. doi:10. 1177/1028315309331490.

Mahu, DP. (2012). Why is learning English so beneficial nowadays?.Prof.,Transport Technical College, 2(4), 374-376.

Martirosyan, N.M., Hwang, E., &Wanjohi, R. (2015). Impact of English proficiency on academic performance of international students. Journal of International Students 5(1), 60-71.

McKenzie, K., Gow, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2004). Exploring first year academic achievement through structural equation modelling. Higher Education Research and Development,23, 95-112.

Murphy, B. (2010). Foreign language learning in Irish second level schools: Gender very much on the agenda. Irish Educational Studies29, 81-95.

Murray, A. D., Johnson, J., & Peters, J. (1990). Fine-tuning of utterance lengthto preverbal infants: Effects on later language development. Journal of ChildLanguage, 17, 511–525.

Ortega, L. (2013). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxon: Routledge.

Read, J. (2015). Assessing English Proficiency for University Study. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Reddy, M.S. (2016). Importance of English Language in Today’s World. International Journal of Academic Research 3(4), 179 – 184.

Roulstone, S., Loader, S., Northstone, K. (2002). Descriptive data from the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Early Child Developmentand Care, 22, 259–268.

Setyonugroho, W., Permana, I. (2015). Language proficiency and student performance in English-speaking country medical schools: A mini review. Proceedings of International conference medical and health science, Yogyakarta.

Van Der Slik, F.W.P., van Hout, R.W.N.M., Schepens, J.J. (2015). The gender gap in second language acquisition: Gender differences in the acquisition of Dutch among immigrants from 88 Countries with 49 mother tongues. PLoS ONE 10 (11), 1-22. e0142056. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142056.

DOI: Abstract - 0 PDF - 0


  • There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, p-ISSN: 2356-1416, e-ISSN: 2442-9848

View My Stats