Social Distance Dynamics among Papuan and Local Students at Sriwijaya University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15408/jisi.v6i1.53340Keywords:
Social Distance, Papuan Student, Social integrationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the dynamics of social distance between students from Papua and local students from South Sumatra (Palembang, Lubuk Linggau, Prabumulih, and Pagar Alam) at Sriwijaya University. The study employs a qualitative approach using the case study method to understand patterns of social relationships within a multicultural campus environment. Data was collected through non-participant observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation involving students from Papua, local students, and supporting informants. Data were analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña model through data condensation, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. Analysis using Emory S. Bogardus’s social distance theory indicates that social distance remains evident across four dimensions: affective, normative, interactive, and cultural. Cultural differences, language, communication patterns, stereotypes, and low interaction intensity are the primary factors influencing intergroup relations. Nevertheless, social integration is beginning to develop through academic activities, student organizations, and daily interactions that enhance social acceptance and cultural adaptation. Based on a synthesis of the empirical patterns identified during data analysis, the researcher formulated the Gradual Social Integration Model as a theoretical-analytical construct. This model maps the process of social distance reduction through six stages identified in the data: initial stereotypes, group exclusivity, academic contact, the formation of social trust, two-way cultural adaptation, and social integration. Thus, the contribution of this research lies in the formulation of a data-driven conceptual model that expands the application of Bogardus’s social distance theory. These findings also provide insights for universities in creating a more inclusive campus environment.
Downloads
References
Azman, M. K., & Suryandari, N. (2022). Komunikasi lintas budaya: Proses adaptasi mahasiswa Papua di Universitas Trunojoyo Madura. Komunikasiana: Journal of Communication Studies, 4(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.24014/kjcs.v4i1.18534
Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Measuring social distances. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 299–308.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Polity Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Fitrianti, A., & Riyandani, F. (2023). Hambatan komunikasi antarbudaya mahasiswa Papua di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 18042–18046. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i2.9219
Hpar, W. P. P., Kurniawan, W., Umais, T. R., Rahman, N. A., Islamiah, J., & Wahyuni, W. (2024). Analisis konvergensi dan divergensi komunikasi antarbudaya: Studi kasus komunikasi mahasiswa Papua di Universitas Mataram. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(1), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i1.1204
Human Rights Watch. (2024, September 18). Indonesia: Racism, discrimination against Indigenous Papuans. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/09/18/indonesia-racism-discrimination-against-indigenous-papuans
Kapisa, I. (2023). Perlakuan diskriminasi terhadap mahasiswa Papua di kota studi Yogyakarta. Commsphere: Jurnal Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(II), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.37631/commsphere.v1iII.1014
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage.
Meliana, Y., & Tondok, M. S. (2023). Prejudice toward Papuan students: The role of intergroup anxiety, belief, contact quantity, and social identity. Sosiohumaniora, 25(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v25i2.38300
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Mubarroq, R., Masriadi, M., Muchlis, M., & Zahari, Z. (2025). Analisis komunikasi antarbudaya mahasiswa Papua dengan masyarakat Kota Lhokseumawe. Aceh Anthropological Journal, 9(2), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.29103/aaj.v9i2.22875
Muhajir, M., & Anismar. (2021). Strategi komunikasi budaya mahasiswa Papua dalam interaksi dengan mahasiswa Aceh di Universitas Malikussaleh. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh, 2(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.29103/jspm.v2i2.6080
Nurhaliza, N., Effriansyah, M. K., Putra, A. D. S., Waluyati, S. A., & Camellia, C. (2024). Analisis pemahaman mahasiswa Papua terhadap bahasa Sumatera Selatan di lingkungan Universitas Sriwijaya. Rhizome: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Humaniora, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.56393/rhizome.v5i1.2515
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
Romadhoni, N., Wulandari, M. P., & Oktaviani, F. H. (2024). Pengalaman komunikasi antarbudaya (tantangan dan adaptasi mahasiswa Papua Tengah). Kaganga: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 7(2), 1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.31539/kaganga.v7i2.13575
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Simbolon, A. A. P., Simanjorang, J. Y., & Wicaksono, K. W. (2023). Studi fenomenologi tindakan rasialisme terhadap mahasiswa Papua di Kota Yogyakarta. Contemporary Public Administration Review, 1(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.26593/copar.v1i1.7121.59-73
Susanti, E. R. (2020). Jarak sosial mahasiswa Universitas Sriwijaya etnis Papua dengan mahasiswa asal Palembang [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Sriwijaya]. Sriwijaya University Repository. https://repository.unsri.ac.id/38788/
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. https://doi.org/10.54676/JJNK6989
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2016). Leaving no one behind: The imperative of inclusive development: Report on the World Social Situation 2016. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/5aa151e0-en
Warmasen, L. M., Apriati, Y., & Widaty, C.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elzi Rofita Susanti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





