AUKUS and Australia’s Threat Perception Towards China

Muhammad Na'imullah

Abstract


Abstract. This study examines how Australia's participation in the AUKUS agreement reflects a shift in its threat perception toward China. The research aims to: (1) analyze the factors driving Australia's heightened threat perception, and (2) explain why this perception led to the abandonment of its hedging strategy between the U.S. (security ally) and China (economic partner). Methodologically, the article employs a deductive interpretive approach, adapting Rousseau's heuristic model to assess three key dimensions: identity divergence (status-quo vs. revisionist states), military capacity disparity, and China's aggressive regional intentions. The findings reveal that Australia's decision to join AUKUS was primarily motivated by China's revisionist identity, overwhelming military advantage, and assertive actions in strategically vital regions. The study concludes that these factors collectively elevated Australia's threat perception to a level where security concerns outweighed economic benefits, prompting a definitive alignment with the U.S.-led order.

 

Keywords: Australia, China, AUKUS, Threat Perception, Status-quo, Revisionist, Identit.

 

Abstrak. Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana partisipasi Australia dalam kesepakatan AUKUS mencerminkan perubahan persepsi ancaman terhadap China. Tujuan penelitian adalah: (1) menganalisis faktor-faktor pemicu peningkatan persepsi ancaman Australia, dan (2) menjelaskan alasan persepsi ini mengakhiri strategi hedging antara Amerika Serikat (sekutu keamanan) dan China (mitra ekonomi). Secara metodologis, artikel menggunakan pendekatan interpretatif deduktif dengan mengadaptasi model heuristik Rousseau untuk menilai tiga dimensi: perbedaan identitas (negara status-quo vs. revisionist), kesenjangan kapasitas militer, dan intensi agresif China di kawasan strategis. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa keputusan Australia bergabung dengan AUKUS terutama dipicu oleh identitas revisionis China, keunggulan militer China, dan tindakan asertifnya di wilayah-wilayah penting. Kesimpulan penelitian menyatakan bahwa faktor-faktor ini secara kolektif meningkatkan persepsi ancaman Australia hingga mengalahkan manfaat ekonomi, mendorong aliansi tegas dengan tatanan pimpinan Amerika Serikat.

 

Kata Kunci: Australia, China, AUKUS, Persepsi Ancaman, Status-quo, Revisionis, Identitas.


Keywords


Australia; China; AUKUS; Threat Perception; Status-quo; Revisionist; Identity;

References


Alagappa, M. (2003). Constructing security order in Asia: Conceptions and issues. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Asian security order: Instrumental and normative features (pp. 70–105). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779197-007

Australian Government. (2013). Strong and secure: A strategy for Australia's national security. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2013-01/apo-nid33996.pdf

Australia supports peaceful dispute resolution in the South China Sea. (2016, July 12). Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Media Release. https://www.dfat.gov.au/news/news/Pages/australia-supports-peaceful-dispute-resolution-in-the-south-china-sea

Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952796

Bilton, L. (2018). Does China's new South Pacific mega-wharf pose a risk to Australia? 60 Minutes. https://www.9news.com.au/national/60-minutes-china-south-pacific-australia-sydney-expansion-investment-debt/e074f394-03f7-4889-a6f0-3190cd1bce6c

Bloomfield, A. (2016). To balance or to bandwagon? Adjusting to China's rise during Australia's Rudd-Gillard era. The Pacific Review, 29(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1013497

Buzan, B. (2010). China in international society: Is “peaceful rise” possible? The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(1), 5–36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48615778

Chan, L. H. (2019). Australia's strategic hedging in the Indo-Pacific: A "third way" beyond either China or the US [Policy paper]. Australia-China Relations Institute. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/142849/2/ACRI_Australias%20strategic%20hedging%20in%20the%20Indo-Pacific%20-%20a%20third%20way%20beyond%20either%20China%20or%20the%20US%20-%20Lai-Ha%20Chan.pdf

Commonwealth of Australia. (2017). 2017 foreign policy white paper. https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/2017-foreign-policy-white-paper.pdf

Cook, M. (2021). Australia's South China Sea challenges. Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/australia-s-south-china-sea-challenges

Cox, L., Cooper, D., & O’Connor, B. (2023). The AUKUS umbrella: Australia-US relations and strategic culture in the shadow of China's rise. International Journal, 78(3), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020231195631

Cuong, T. P., Tien, N. H., & Tai, V. P. (2023). The role of the AUKUS alliance in counterbalancing China. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4(1), 51–58. https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20230107164214_A-23-03.1.pdf

Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303

Davidson, J. W. (2006). The origins of revisionist and status-quo states. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-09201-4

Davis, J. W. (2000). Threats and promises: The pursuit of international influence. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Diabat, K. S. (2023). Hybrid balancing in the Indo-Pacific region: “AUKUS” vs. “Belt and Road.” Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 50(5), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i5.935

Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621

Gill, B. (2023). Explaining the troubled Australia-China relationship: A perspective from Australia. China Review, 23(1), 243–275. https://cup.cuhk.edu.hk/image/catalog/journal/jpreview/CR23.1_243-275.pdf

Goodman, D. S. G. (2017). Australia and the China threat: Managing ambiguity. The Pacific Review, 30(5), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1339118

Grieco, J. M. (1990). Cooperation among nations: Europe, America, and non-tariff barriers to trade. Cornell University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctv3s8p3q

Gulick, E. V. (1955). Europe's classical balance of power. Norton.

Hanggarini, P., Madjid, M. A., Perwita, A. A. B., & Wiranto, S. (2023). AUKUS: Unresolved threats to the international system? Multidisciplinary Reviews, 6(3), 2023027. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2023027

Hayton, B. (2014). The South China Sea: The struggle for power in Asia. Yale University Press.

Himmer, M., & Rod, Z. (2022). Chinese debt trap diplomacy: Reality or myth? Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 18(3), 250–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2023.2195280

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2024). World economic outlook database: April 2024. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2024/April

International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). (2022). The military balance 2022 (F. Bell, Ed.). Routledge.

Jones, J. M. (1972). Prejudice and racism. Addison-Wesley.

Kearsley, J., Bagshaw, E., & Galloway, A. (2020, November 18). “If you make China the enemy, China will be the enemy”: Beijing’s fresh threat to Australia. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/if-you-make-china-the-enemy-china-will-be-the-enemy-beijing-s-fresh-threat-to-australia-20201118-p56fqs.html

Korolev, A. (2023). Transition from hedging to balancing in Australia's China policy: Theoretical and empirical explorations. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 77(5), 548–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2274446

Kwon, J. (2020). When the kangaroo encounters the flying dragon: The growth of balancing elements in Australia's China policy. Pacific Focus, 35(3), 491–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12174

Kydd, A. (1997). Sheep in sheep's clothing: Why security seekers don’t fight each other. Security Studies, 7(1), 114–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419708429336

Lee, P. K., & Carr, A. (2022). Australia's great-power threat perceptions and leadership responses. Asia Policy, 17(4), 77–99. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27254595

Leonova, O. (2022). The impact of the strategic partnership AUKUS on the geopolitical situation in the Indo-Pacific region. International Organizations Research Journal, 17(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2022-03-08

Liu, K. (2022). Decoding Australia's China threat narrative during 2016–2021. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 64(1), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12352

Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Power-A-Radical-View-Steven-Lukes.pdf

MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (1992). Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the US economy. The American Political Science Review, 86(3), 597–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964124

Mackerras, C. (2010). The “China threat” in the context of China’s rise: A view from Australia. In H. S. Yee (Ed.), China's rise – Threat or opportunity? (pp. 211–232). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842690

Mao, F. (2021, September 20). Aukus: Australia's big gamble on the US over China. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-58635393

Mastanduno, M. (2003). Incomplete hegemony: The United States and security order in Asia. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Asian security order: Instrumental and normative features (pp. 141–170). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779197-009

Mastro, O. S. (2022). Deterrence in the Indo-Pacific. Asia Policy, 17(4), 8–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27254588

McDowall, R. (2009). The strategic deduction of China in Howard government policy from 1996–2006. Security Challenges, 5(1), 85–102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26459163

Medcalf, R. (2016). Rules, balance, and lifelines: An Australian perspective on the South China Sea. Asia Policy, 21, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2016.0002

Medcalf, R. (2022). Contest for the Indo-Pacific: Why China won’t map the future. La Trobe University Press.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1993). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (K. W. Thompson, Rev.). McGraw-Hill.

Okuda, H. (2016). China's “peaceful rise/peaceful development”: A case study of media frames of the rise of China. Global Media and China, 1(1–2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416646275

Park, J. J. (2011). The US-led alliances in the Asia-Pacific: Hedge against potential threats or an undesirable multilateral security order? The Pacific Review, 24(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2011.560957

Pisciotta, B. (2023). Regional and global revisionism: Russia and China in a comparative perspective. The International Spectator, 58(3), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2023.2194161

Rousseau, D. L. (2006). Identifying threats and threatening identities: The social construction of realism and liberalism. Stanford University Press.

Rousseau, D. L., & Retamero, R. G. (2007). Identity, power, and threat perception: A cross-national experimental study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(5), 744–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707304813

Roy, D. (2003). China's reaction to American predominance. Survival, 45(3), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330312331343536

Schweller, R. (1998). Deadly imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's strategy of world conquest. Columbia University Press.

The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. (2019). China's national defense in the new era. Foreign Languages Press. https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/201907/24/content_WS5d3941ddc6d08408f502283d.html

Taylor, N. (2007). China as a status quo or revisionist power? Implications for Australia. Security Challenges, 3(1), 29–45. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26458849

Wallis, J. (2023). The enclosure and exclusion of Australia's “Pacific family.” Political Geography, 106, 102935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102935

Wallis, J., Ireland, A., Robinson, I., & Turner, A. (2022). Framing China in the Pacific Islands. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 76(5), 522–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2022.2063252

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Random House.

Wang, A. (2022, September 20). China slams “double standards” of Aukus nuclear subs deal, warns of impact on Korea, Iran efforts. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3193155/china-slams-double-standards-aukus-nuclear-subs-deal-warns

Wilkins, T. (2023). Middle power hedging in the era of security/economic disconnect: Australia, Japan, and the “special strategic partnership.” *International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 23*(1), 93–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcab023

Wolfers, A. (1962). Discord and collaboration. Johns Hopkins University Press.

World Bank. (n.d.). GDP (current US$) – China, Australia. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=CN-AU

World Bank. (n.d.). Military expenditure (% of GDP) – China, Australia. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?locations=CN-AU

Wroe, D. (2018a, April 9). China eyes Vanuatu military base in plan with global ramifications. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/china-eyes-vanuatu-military-base-in-plan-with-global-ramifications-20180409-p4z8j9.html

Wroe, D. (2018b, April 12). Response to rumours of a Chinese military base in Vanuatu speaks volumes about Australian foreign policy. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/response-to-rumours-of-a-chinese-military-base-in-vanuatu-speaks-volumes-about-australian-foreign-policy-94813

Xue, Y. (2023). Balancing against China with confidence: Australia's foreign policy toward China in 2020–22. Asia Policy, 18(1), 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.0010

Zhou, W., & Laurenceson, J. (2022). Demystifying Australia-China trade tensions. Journal of World Trade, 56(1), 51–86. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3806162


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/jisi.v6i1.45112

Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Na'imullah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.