The Effect of Blended Learning to the Students’ Achievement in Grammar Class

Arina Isti'anah



Blended learning is believed to improve students’ understanding in learning second language. The employment of offline and online activities is expected to give better outcome than the traditional face-to-face activities. This article presents how blended learning was applied in an English grammar class and whether it significantly improved students’ achievement after the treatment. The participants involved in this research were 26 students of the the second semester students of the English Letters Department, Sanata Dharma University. A pre-experimental research was conducted by comparing the means of the participants’ scores in both pre-test and post-test. The analysis figured out that there was a significant improvement, proven by the paired t-test analysis. The p-value 0.00 was less than alpha 0.05. This research concluded that blended learning was effective to assist the students to learn English grammar. To strengthen the findings, this research also involved pre-questionnaire and post-questionnaire to understand students’ responses on the use of blended learning. In the end of the semester, most students found that online activities help them comprehend and practice the materials. Students’ reflective journals also revealed that blended learning was able to improve their understanding and interest in learning English grammar.



Blended learning dipercaya mampu meningkatkan pemahaman siswa dalam memahami bahasa asing. Penggunaan aktifitas offline dan online diharapkan mampu memberi luaran yang lebih baik dibandingkan aktifitas tatap muka secara tradisional. Artikel ini menyajikan bagaimana blended learning diterapkan dalam kelas English grammar dan mengungkapkan apakah blended learning memberikan perbedaan berarti dalam pencapaian mahasiswa sebelum dan setelah perlakuan. Partisipan yang dilibatkan dalam penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa semester dua dari Program Studi Sastra Inggris, Universitas Sanata Dharma. 26 partisipan dilibatkan dalam penelitian ini. Penelitian pra-eksperimen diterapkan dengan membandingkan rata-rata nilai dari peserta dalam pre-tes dan pos-tes. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan signifikan rata-rata dari kedua tes, yang ditunjukkan dengan analisis pasangan t-tes. Nilai p menunjukkan 0.00 dan lebih kecil dari alpha 0.05. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa blended learning efektif untuk mendampingi mahasiswa belajar English grammar. Untuk memperkuat penemuan tersebut, penelitian ini juga melibatkan pre-kuesioner dan pos-kuesioner. Pada akhir semester, sebagian besar mahasiswa menemukan bahwa aktifitas online membantu mereka memahami dan melatih materi yang mereka pelajari. Jurnal reflektif mahasiswa juga menunjukkan bahwa blended learning mampu meningkatkan kemampuan mereka belajar English Grammar.

How to Cite: Isti’anah, A. (2017). The Effect of Blended Learning to the Students’ Achievement in Grammar Class. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 4(1), 16-30 doi:10.15408/ijee.v4i1.5697.

DOI: v4i1.5697



blended learning; grammar; pre-experimental research; blended learning; grammar; penelitian pra-eksperimen

Full Text:



Ayan, E. (2015). Moodle as Builder of Motivation and Autonomy in English Courses, (February), 6–20.

Bersin, J. (2004). The Blended Learning Book. San Fransisco: Pfeiffer.

Burns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Routledge.

Camahalan, F. M. G., & Ruley, A. G. (2014). Blended learning and teaching writing : A teacher action research project, 15(16), 1–13.

Chansamrong, A., Tubsree, C., & Kiratibodee, P. (2014, December). Effectiveness of Cooperative and Blended Learning to Assist Thai ESL Students in Learning Grammar. HRD Journal, 5(2), 105-115.

Dettori, G., & Persico, D. (2007). Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in a Blended Course. In Workshop on Blended Learning (pp. 174–185). Edinburgh.

Donaldson, R. P., & Haggstrom, M. A. (2006). Through CALL. New York: Routledge.

Godwin-jones, R. (2011). Emerging Technologies Autonomous Language Learning, 15(3), 4–11.

Grgurovic, M. (2011). Blended Learning in an ESL Class: A Case Study, 29(1), 100–117.

Keshta, A. S., & Harb, I. I. (2013). The effectiveness of a blended learning program on developing Palestinian tenth graders ’ English writing skills, 2(6), 208–221.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Moreno, J. d. (2012). Using Social Network and Dropbox in Blended Learning: An Application to University Education. Business, Management and Education, 10(2), 220-231.

Orhan, F. (2007). Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Blended Learning Instruction. World Applied Science Journal, 2(4), 390-398.

Rawahi, N., & Balushi, S. M. (2015). The Effect of Reflective Science Journal Writing on Students' Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(3), 367-379.

Shen, H., & Liu, W. (2011). A Survey on the Self-regulation Efficacy in DUT ’ s English Blended Learning Context. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1099–1110. 04/jltr.2.5.1099-1110

Tongchai, N. (2016, May). Impact of Self-Regulation and Open Learner Model on Learning Achievement in Blended Learning Environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology., 6(5), 343-347.

Thorne, K. (2003). Blended Learning : How to Integrate. London: Kogan.

Wright, B. M. (2017). Blended Learning: Student Perception of Face-toFace and Online EFL Lessons. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 66-71.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under aCC-BY-SA

Indexed By:

IPI Portal Garuda Open Archives Initiative MoraRef OAJI Scholar Steer IPI Portal Garuda IPI Portal Garuda IPI Portal Garuda berita terkini edukasi IPI Portal Garuda berita terkini regional

Web Analytics View My Stats