The Effect of Grit, Proactive Personality, Supervisor Support, Organizational Support on Employee Work Engagement
Abstract
Each employee may have different level of work engagement. A company must wants its employees to have high level of work engagement so they can work vigorously, with good dedication and get fully immersed in the work. The grit, proactive personality, supervisor support and organizational support factors can be predicted to to be able to influence work engagement of the employees. This study aims to discover the effect of grit, proactive personality, supervisor support, and organizational support on work engagement on employees. The subject of this study was employees who work at companies in East Java. Quantitative method was applied in this study with 197 subjects in total using simple random sampling technique. Grit Scale, Proactive Personality Scale (PPS), Surveys of Perceived Supervisor Support, Perceived Organizational Support (POS), and Utrech Work Engagement Scale - 9 (UWES-9) were the instruments used in this study. The results of the analysis explain there was an effect of grit on work engagement on employees (p<.05), there was an effect of supervisor support on work engagement on employees (p<.05), there was an effect of organization support on work engagement on employees (p<.05), and there wasn’t an effect of proactive personality on work engagement on employees (p>.05). As for suggestions for further research, paying more attention to completeness and suitability when distributing questionnaires to respondent, and it is necessary to pay more attention to the characteristics of the research subjects and other factors that might affect employee engagement such as social welfare, quality of work life, and organizational culture.
Keywords
References
Amalia, R. S. (2023). The differences of work engagement permanent and contract employee in a multinational company in Indonesia. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Psychology and Flourishing Humanity (PFH 2023), Advances in Social Science, Educational and Humanities Research.
Baidun, A., Murniasih, F., Lubis, R. H., Ghina, A., Latifa, R & Irvan, M. (2023). Innovative work behavior of santri: The influence of proactive personality and boarding school climate. TAZKIYA Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.15408/tazkiya.v12i1.37945
Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: the role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471
Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. (2010). Work Engagement a handbook of essential theory and research. Psychology Press.
Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411414534
Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. G. M. (2019). Daily job crafting and momentary work engagement: a self-determination and self-regulation perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112(January 2018), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.12.005
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202
Cobb, B. (2021). Work engagement, emotional labor, and grit in frontline restaurant employees: a quantitative study. Journal Dissertation, 1(1), 6.
Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. Growth: The Journal of the Association for Christians in Student Developmen, 16(16), 8.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. In Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Prentice Hall.
Hakanen, J. J., Ropponen, A., Schaufeli, W. B., & De Witte, H. (2019). Who is engaged at work?: A large-scale study in 30 European countries. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61(5), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001528
Hardianto, Y., & Ratna, D. (2022). Pengaruh perceived organizational support terhadap work engagement pada karyawan panghegar stone quary contribution perceived organizational support on work engagement employees at pt. panghegar stone quarry. Penelitian Pendidikan, Psikologi Dan Kesehatan, 3(1), 1–6.
Hidayah Ibrahim, S. N., Suan, C. L., & Karatepe, O. M. (2019). The effects of supervisor support and self-efficacy on call center employees’ work engagement and quitting intentions. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-12-2017-0320
Ilvonda, L. F., & . F. (2020). Urgensi modal psikologi dalam membangun keterikatan kerja karyawan penambangan. Motiva Jurnal Psikologi, 3(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.31293/mv.v3i1.4796
Indah Cahyanti. (2022). Gambaran persepsi dukungan organisasi pada frontliner di bank x. Jurnal Kesehatan Dan Kedokteran, 1(2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.56127/jukeke.v1i2.230
Kottke, J. L., & Sharafinski, C. E. (1988). Measuring perceived supervisory and organizational support. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(4), 1075–1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164488484024
Kristiana, I. F., Fajrianthi., & Purwono, U. (2019). Analisis rasch dalam utrecht work engagement scale-9 (UWES 9) versi bahasa indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Diponegoro, 17(2), 204–217.
Li, M., Wang, Z., Gao, J., & You, X. (2017). Proactive personality and job satisfaction: The mediating effects of self-efficacy and work engagement in teachers. Current Psychology, 36(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9383-1
Lin, Shin-Huei., Lu, Wan-Chen., Chen, Yi-Chieh., & Wu, Ming-Han. (2022). The relationship among proactive personality, work engagement, and perceived work competence in sports coaches: The moderating role of perceived supervisor support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, (1-14).
Mufarrikhah, J. L., Yuniardi, M. S., & Syakarofath, N. A. (2020). Peran perceived organizational support terhadap work engagement karyawan. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.56396
Muhammad Shohib; Cholichul Hadi. (2018). Keterikatan kerja di organisasi nonprofit. Jurnal Fakultas Psikologi Undip, 4(1), 317–327.
Prahara, S. A. (2020). Budaya organisasi dengan work engagement pada karyawan. Jurnal RAP (Riset Aktual Psikologi Universitas Negeri Padang), 10(2), 232. https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v10i2.106977
Pratiwi, P.E., Stanislaus, S., & Pratiwi, P.C. (2023). The tendency of quiet quitting workers in terms of engagement and well-being at work. Philanthropy: Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 132-143.
Preston, M. (2018). Pengaruh pola asuh ayah dan ibu terhadap efikasi-diri dalam pengambilan keputusan karier yang dimediasi oleh kepribadian proaktif pada siswa sekolah menengah atas. Universitas Indonesia.
Ramdhani, G. F., & Sawitri, D. R. (2017). Hubungan antara dukungan organisasi dengan keterikatan kerja pada karyawan pt. x di bogor. Jurnal EMPATI, 6(1), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2017.15211
Rusli, R., Ainy Fardana, N., & Hendriani, W. (2021). Grit in medical professional education students. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.57068
Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Utrecht Work Engagement Scale : Preliminary Manual. Utrecht University: Occupational Health Psychology Unit.
Singh, J., & Chopra, V. G. (2018). Workplace spirituality, grit and work engagement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 14(1–2), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510x18811776
Smythe, J. (2007). The ceo (chief engagement officer): Turning hierarchy upside down to drive Performance. Gower Publishing Company.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Alfabeta.
Sun, L. (2019). Perceived organizational support: a literature review. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 9(3), 155. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v9i3.15102
Tiara, S. & R. (2017). Peran kualitas kehidupan kerja dan grit terhadap keterikatan kerja pada generasi millenial di industri perbankan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni, 2(1), 342–349.
Tri, R., Safariningsih, H., Rizan, M., & Handaru, W. (2022). Peran grit dan self efficacy terhadap work engagement pada tenaga kesehatan rumah sakit. Jurnal Manajemen Strategi Dan Aplikasi Bisnis, 5(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36407/jmsab.v5i2.671
Wijethilake, C. (2017). Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 196(3), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.057
Yang, K., Yan, X., Fan, J., & Luo, Z. (2017). Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work engagement: a polynomial regression analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.033
Yudiani, E. (2022). Kesejahteraan afektif dan dukungan supervisor sebagai prediktor keterikatan kerja karyawan. Proceeding Conference on Genuine Psychology, 2(1), 258–264.
Yudiarti, A. & Putranta, P. M. (2022). The influence of grit towards work engagement and the moderating-role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Management (JAM), 20(963–971), 708–713. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.238571
DOI: 10.15408/tazkiya.v12i2.31779
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
