Perbedaan Individual pada Ideologi Politik Berbasis Agama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15408/tazkiya.v8i1.14851Keywords:
political ideology, secular, radical Islamism, need for epistemic, need for existential, need for relation, Big Five PersonalityAbstract
In practicing worship almost all Muslims run in the same manner but in Indonesia also found the diversity of the face of Islam. One form of diversity is how to see religion as a political ideology. From various views political ideologies based on Islamic religion have polarizations, namely secular and radical Islamism. How to explain the diversity of ideologies based on individual differences. Jost et al (2009) offer three basic needs that determine individual ideological differences, namely the need for epistemic, the need for existential, and the need for relational. In addition to differences in the concept of fundamental needs, studies also show a relationship between personality types and ideological or political attitudes. Duckitt & Sibley (2010) offers a dual-process motivational model that explains that political ideology is formed due to interactions between personalities and different social situations. Many studies have been conducted to see the relationship between ideology with liberal and conservative polarization (right / left) or right wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) with different needs or personality types (Jost, Ledgerwood, & Hardin, 2008; Jost et al., 2007; Sibley, Osborne, & Duckitt, 2012). However, no research has been conducted on political ideologies based on religion, especially Islam. The study was conducted on 243 Muslims and aged 17 years and over. Questionnaires were distributed in the Greater Jakarta area online and offline. The sampling technique used convenience sampling. Then the data is processed using regression analysis techniques. The results showed that together, the need for epistemic, need for existential, need for relational, and Big five personality influenced Islamic political ideology with a contribution of 7.2%. Significant predictors of the relationship are need for existential and need for relational.Downloads
References
Akhtar, H. (2018). Translation and validation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) into Bahasa Indonesia. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 7(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsp.2018.3009
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
Fauzia, A., Prihatna, A. A., Abubakar, I., Muchtadlirin, Al-Makassary, R., Pranawati, R., … Kamil, S. (2011). Islam di Ruang Publik: Politik Identtas dan Masa Depan Demokrasi di Indonesia. (N. Hasan & I. Abubakar, Eds.). Jakarta: Center for the Study of Religion and Culture.
Hennes, E. P., Nam, H. H., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2012). Not All Ideologies are Created Equal: Epistemic, Existential, and Relational Needs Predict System-Justifying Attitudes. Social Cognition, 30(6), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669
Jost, J. T. (2006). The End of the End of Ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
Jost, J. T., Hawkins, C. B., Nosek, B. a., Hennes, E. P., Stern, C., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, J. (2013). Belief in a just God (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033220
Jost, J. T., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. D. (2008). Shared Reality, System justification, and the Relational Basis of Ideological Beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00056.x
Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301028
Jugert, P., Cohrs, J. C., & Duckitt, J. (2009). Inter- and Intrapersonal Processes Underlying Authoritarianism: The Role of Social conformity and Personal Need for Structure. European Journal of Personality, 23(June), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/per
Leary, M. R., Kelly, K. M., Cottrell, C. A., & Schreindorfer, L. S. (2013). Construct validity of the need to belong scale: Mapping the nomological network. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(6), 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.819511
Sakai, M., & Fauzia, A. (2014). Islamic orientations in contemporary Indonesia : Islamism on the rise ? Asian Ethnicity, 15(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2013.784513
Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, Bonding, Behaving, and Belonging. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111412267
Sibley, C. G., Osborne, D., & Duckitt, J. (2012). Personality and political orientation: Meta-analysis and test of a Threat-Constraint Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.002
Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1992). A revised death anxiety scale. Death Studies, 16(6), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481189208252595
Vail, K. E., Rothschild, Z. K., Weise, D. R., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2010). A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309351165
Verhulst, B., Hatemi, P. K., & Martin, N. G. (2010). The nature of the relationship between personality traits and political attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.013
Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as Identity: Toward an Understanding of Religion From a Social Identity Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309349693
