Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja dan Keterlibatan Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Karyawan Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional (Batan) Puspiptek Serpong
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh kepuasan kerja dan keterlibatan kerja terhadap komitmen organisasi karyawan. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah karyawan Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional (BATAN) PUSPIPTEK Serpong sebanyak 200 karyawan. Teknik sampling yang digunakan adalah probability sampling. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah Multiple Regression Analysis pada taraf signifikansi 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan kepuasan kerja dan keterlibatan kerja terhadap komitmen organisasi karyawan. Proporsi varians dari komitmen organisasi yang dijelaskan oleh semua independent variable adalah sebesar 35,7%, sedangkan 64,3% sisanya dipengaruhi oleh variabel lain diluar penelitian ini. Hasil uji hipotesis minor menunjukkan bahwa komunikasi, importance of performance with valued self dan concistency with self concept memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap komitmen organisasi. Sementara itu, gaji, promosi, supervisi, tunjangan, penghargaan, prosedur operasional, rekan kerja, sifat pekerjaan, central life interest dan active participation tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap komitmen organisasi.
Keywords
References
As’ad, M. (1980). Psikologi industri (2 nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Liberty Offset.
Blau, G. and K. Boal. (1989). “Using job involvement and organizational commitment interactively to predict turnover.” Journal of Management, 15: 115-127.
Blau, G. J. & K. B. Boal. (1987). “Conceptualizing how job involvement and organizational commitment affect turnover and absenteeism.” Academy of Management Review, 12: 288-300.
Brown, S. P. & T. W. Leigh. (1996). “A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 358-368.
Buitendach, J. H. and H. De Witte. (2005). “Job insecurity, extrinsic and intrinsic job satisfaction and affective organisational commitment of maintenance workers in a parastatal. ” Southern African Journal Business and Management, 36: 27-34.
Cook, J. and T. Wall. (1980). “New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment.” Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53: 39-52.
Ekmecki,A.K. (2011). “A study on involvement and commitment of employees in Turkey.” Journal of Public Adsministration and Policy Research, 3: 68-73.
Hallberg, U. E. and W. B. Schaufeli. (2006). “Same-same but different ? can work engagement be discriminated from job involvement and organizational commitment?.” European Psychologist, 11: 119-129.
Jewell, L. N. & M. Siegall. (1990). “Contemporary industrial/ organizational psychology.” West Publishing Company.
Jewell, L. N. & M. Siegall. (1998). “Psikologi industri/ organisasi modern.” Jakarta: Arcan.
Kreitner, R. and Kinicki, A. (2009). “Organizational behavior (8 th ed).” New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Levy, P. E. (2006). “Industrial / organizational psychology : understanding the workplace (2 nd ed.).” U. S . A: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Lumley, E.J., M. Coetzee, M., R. Tladinyane, & N. Ferreira. (2011). “Exploring the job satisfaction and organizational commitment of employees in the information technology environment.” Southern African Business Review, 15: 100-118.
Mathieu, J. E. and D. M. Zajac. (1990). “A review and meta-analysis of the antecendents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment.” Psychological Bulletin, 108: 171- 194.
Mathieu, J. E. and J. L.Farr. (1991). “Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 127-133.
DOI: 10.15408/tazkiya.v6i2.10995
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
