Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Direksi Dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Dikaitkan Dengan Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas
Abstract
The Board of Directors manages the firm in line with laws, rules, the articles of incorporation, and GMS decisions. Setbacks and lack of funds may force a company's board of directors to sell its assets. For legal processes to transfer or sell corporate assets, the company's articles of association must be examined, and if the transfer exceeds 50%, agreement from the Company's GMS is required. Taking the step by the board of directors will have legal consequences. This study uses normative legal research to get relevant data. The author used statutory methodology, authority, and legal consequences as analytical tools. Legal papers are studied by recognizing and cataloging grammatical and systematic interpretations of secondary data. The study obtained the authority of the board of directors, where in carrying out the responsibilities of managing the company is limited by laws and regulations, as stated in the articles of association of the PT in accordance with Article 100 paragraph (1) of the Limited Liability Company Law, and legal consequences for the parties in the case of misuse of such authority in the transfer. PPJB is agreement cancellation with compensation. In accordance with Civil Code Articles 1243 and 1244, which refer to the reimbursement of costs, damages, and interest in the case of a contract violation, parties aggrieved by the cancellation of the PPJB have filed a lawsuit for recovery of all costs and interest.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ais, Chatamarrasjid. (2000). Menyingkap Tabir Perseroan (Piercing The Corporate Veil) Kapita Selekta Hukum Perusahaan. Bandung: Cipta Aditya Bakti
Daniel V. Davidson cs. (1987). Comprehensive Business Law, Principle and Cases, Kent Publishing Company, Boston Massachusetts, Second Edition. Dalam Marhara Tua Mulyadi Tambunan, Ramli Siregar, dan Windha, “Tanggung Jawab Direksi Terhadap Pemegang Saham Beritikad Baik Atas Pembelian Kembali Saham Yang Batal Karena Hukum”, Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, Februari – Mei. 2013
Fuady, Munir. (2003) Perseroan Terbatas Paradigma Baru. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
Harahap, Sofyan Syafri. (2009). Analisis Kritis Atas Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Ibrahim, Jhonny. (2007). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang
Khairandy, Ridwan. (2008). Perseroan Terbatas, Doktrin, Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Yurisprudensi. Yogyakarta: Total Media
Prasetya, Rudi. (1996). Kedudukan Mandiri Perseroan Terbatas. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Prodjodikoro, Wiryono. (2000). Perbuatan Melanggar Hukurn. Bandung: Mandar Maju
Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 280 K/Pdt/2006
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2917 K/Pdt/2016
Syahdeni, Sutan Remy. (2002). Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas
Widjaja, Gunawan. (2004). Tanggung Jawab Direbi atas Kepailitan Perseroan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Wijaya, I. G. Rai. (2000). Hukum Perusahaaan. Jakarta: Kesaint Blanc.
Wicaksono, Frans Satrio. (2009). Tanggung Jawab Pemegang Saham, Direksi, Dan Komisaris. Jakarta: PT, Visimedia
Yani, Ahmad; Widjaja, Gunawan. (1999). Seri Hukum Bisnis PT. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27735 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.