Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Proposional Terbuka Pada Kualifikasi Calon Legislatif
Abstract
Abstract
Political parties in recruiting legislative candidates if only based on an open proportional system are not enough, especially if only in good faith to be able to become people's representatives. However, the most important thing needed is intellectual ability and integrity in understanding, both regarding legislation, as well as the main goal of achievement, which is to gain the benefit of all the people of Indonesia. Therefore, to produce politicians who are cultured or politicians who have dignity, self-esteem, and a clear way of thinking, a system that is in accordance with needs is needed. Due to the poor quality produced by legislators from various parties, political parties are not relevant in recruiting legislative candidates. By doing so, it is necessary to hold a fit and proper test in the selection of candidates for legislative members by external political parties that have standardization of graduation for candidates for legislative members. Besides the application of an open proportional system, it has a great influence on determining the quality of legislative members. With the implementation of an open proportional system, it will cause many popular legislative candidates to be elected without considering the capacity of the ability of legislative candidates who occupy positions, as well as allowing each candidate to compete to win public sympathy and will trigger a polemic over money politics.
Keywords: Proportional System, Recruitment, Legislative Candidates
Keywords
References
Buku
Aji, A.M.; Yunus, N.R. Basic Theory of Law and Justice, Jakarta: Jurisprudence Institute, 2018.
Budiharjo, Mariam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia PustakaUtama. (1992)
Budiharjo, Mariam. Demokrasi di Indonesia, Demokasi Parlementer dan Demokrasi Pancasila, Jakarta: Gramedia. (1996)
Gaffar, Afan. Politik Indonesia Transisi Menuju Demokrasi.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, Cet.VI. (2006)
H.I, A. Rahman. Sistem Politik Indonesia. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu. (2007)
Kusnadi, Moh. dan Harmaily Ibrahim. Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Bakti Fakultas Hukum UI. (1988)
Lubis, Mochtar. Demokrasi Klasik dan Modern. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. 2005.
Maggalatung, A.S.; Aji, A.M.; Yunus, N.R. How The Law Works, Jakarta: Jurisprudence Institute, 2014.
Marijan, Kacung. Sistem Politik Indonesia; Konsolidasi DemokrasiPasca Orde Baru. Jakarta: Kencana. 2012.
Pamungkas, Sigit. Perihal Pemilu. Yogyakarta: Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan FISIPOL UGM dan Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan UGM. 2009.
Prihatmoko, Joko J. Pemilu 2004 dan Konsolidasi Demokrasi. Semarang: LP2I. 2003.
Scumpeter, Joseph. Capitalism Socialism and Democracy, New York: Jarper. 1947.
Yunus, Nur Rohim. Teori Dasar Penelitian Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta: Poskolegnas, 2017.
Jurnal
Aminah. “Analisis Penerapan Sistem Proposional Dan SistemDistrik Dalam Pemilihan Umum Untuk Penyedederhanaan Sistem Kepartaian Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Asas Negara Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret: Yustisia, Vol.1, No.2, Mei-Agustus (2012).
Pratiwi, Dian Ayu. “Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Daftar Terbuka DiIndonesia: Melahirkan Korupsi Politik.” Jurnal: Trias Politika, Vol.2, No.1, April (2018).
Ramadani, Muhammad Doni dan Fahmi Arisandi. “Pengaruh Penggunaan Sistem Pemilihan Umum Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Proposional Daftar Terbuka.” Jurnal: Rechts Vinding, Vol. 3 No.1, April (2014).
Riwanto, Agus. “Korelasi Pengaturan Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka Berbasis Suara Terbanyak Dengan Korupsi Politik Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Sebelas Maret: Yustisia, Vol. 4 No. 1 (2015).
Website
https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/495316/bikin-terobosan-pdip-seleksi-caleg-secara-daring
https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/381589/proses-perekrutan-bakal-caleg-demokrat-dimulai-akhir-2016
https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/03/14/18180051/mutu.lembaga.legislatif?page=al
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v1i3.13077 Abstract - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.