Enhancing biology learning outcomes through a blended-discovery learning model integrated with the Bioenial website

Authors

  • Opik Prasetyo Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
  • Bowo Sugiharto Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Harlita Harlita Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v18i1.50232

Keywords:

Bioenial, biology education, Blended-Discovery Learning (BDL), blended learning, learning outcomes, website

Abstract

The post-COVID-19 shift to blended learning presents a significant challenge for biology education, necessitating innovative pedagogical approaches to adapt to the digital era. This study addresses this need by investigating the effectiveness of a Blended-Discovery Learning (BDL) model, specifically when integrated with the Bioenial website, on students' biology learning outcomes. A quasi-experimental research design with a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group was employed with 11th-grade students from a private school in Boyolali, Central Java. Three groups were compared: a control class, an experimental class using BDL with Google Classroom, and another experimental class using BDL with the Bioenial website. Data were collected using a multiple-choice test and analysed through ANCOVA. The findings revealed significant improvements in learning outcomes across all groups, as indicated by higher post-test scores compared with pre-test scores. The ANCOVA analysis demonstrated a significant effect of the instructional model on students' biology learning outcomes, with a large effect size (partial η² = 0.343). The BDL model integrated with the Bioenial website yielded the highest learning outcomes, followed by BDL with Google Classroom and the traditional control group. These findings highlight the potential of BDL as an effective instructional strategy in biology education and suggest that integrating BDL with a specialized digital platform can substantially enhance students' learning outcomes. Therefore, the implementation of BDL supported by dedicated web-based learning environments is highly recommended to optimize biology learning in the digital era.

References

Abualhaija, N. (2019). Using Constructivism and Student-Centered Learning Approaches in Nursing Education. Int J Nurs Health Care Res 7: 093, 5(07), 6.

AlHaqwi, A. I., & Taha, W. S. (2015). Promoting excellence in teaching and learning in clinical education. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 10(1), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2015.02.005

Alzahrani, H. A., Shati, A. A., Bawahab, M. A., Alamri, A. A., Hassan, B., Patel, A. A., Ahmad, M. T., El Maksoud, W. A., & Alsaleem, M. A. (2023). Students’ perception of asynchronous versus synchronous distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in a medical college, southwestern region of Saudi Arabia. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04034-5

Arora, B., & Arora, N. (2021). Web Enhanced Flipped Learning: A Case Study Apprentissage inversé amélioré par le Web: Une étude de cas. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(1), 1–18.

Bandara, K. M. N. T., & Jayaweera, B. P. A. (2024). Commentary on the Applications of Blended Learning in the Teaching and Learning Process – A Review. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v1i2.10

Bayrakci, M., & Karacaoglu, O. C. (2020). Determination of learning outcomes of curriculum development in education according to questions in KPSS (public personnel selection examination) educational sciences test. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(2).

Bhoi, C. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Innovative Learning Approaches in Teaching Biology to Secondary School Students: A Comparative Study of Traditional and Interactive Pedagogical Methods. Journal of Education Method and Learning Strategy, 2(03), 894–906. https://doi.org/10.59653/jemls.v2i03.779

Cao, W. (2023). A meta-analysis of effects of blended learning on performance, attitude, achievement, and engagement across different countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1212056. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212056

Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z

Eka Lidiastuti, A., Priyanti, N. A., Wahyuni, S., Nisa, L. C., Muttaqin, M. Z., & Harifa, Z. (2024). Optimization of Junior High School Biology Learning through the EXAIR Model Based on Brain-Based Learning and Whole Brain Teaching. International Journal of Sustainable English Language, Education, and Science, 1(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.71131/r9jyxf56

Fauzi, A., Siswati, B. H., & Ramadani, S. D. (2024). The low percentage of local wisdom-based biology education research in SINTA- accredited journals. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 10(3).

Fresen, J. W. (2018). Embracing distance education in a blended learning model: Challenges and prospects. Distance Education, 39(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1457949

Gherheș, V., Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., & Stanici, M. (2021). E-Learning vs. Face-To-Face Learning: Analyzing Students’ Preferences and Behaviors. Sustainability, 13(8), 4381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084381

Gogineni, H., Aranda, J. P., & Garavalia, L. S. (2019). Designing professional program instruction to align with students’ cognitive processing. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.11.015

Goss, H. (2022). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education and in Academic Libraries: A Review of the Literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102485

Hariadi, B., Jatmiko, B., Universitas Negeri Surarabaya, Indonesia, budijatmiko@unesa.ac.id, Sunarto, M. J. D., Universitas Dinamika, Indonesia, dewiyani@dinamika.ac.id, Prahani, B. K., Universitas Negeri Surarabaya, Indonesia, binarprahani@unesa.ac.id, Sagirani, T., Universitas Dinamika, Indonesia, tris@dinamika.ac.id, Amelia, T., Universitas Dinamika, Indonesia, meli@dinamika.ac.id, Lemantara, J., & Universitas Dinamika, Indonesia, julianto@dinamika.ac.id. (2022). Higher Order Thinking Skills Based Learning Outcomes Improvement with Blended Web Mobile Learning Model. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15231a

Harris, R., & Clayton, B. (2019). The current emphasis on learning outcomes. International Journal of Training Research, 17(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2019.1644777

Huysken, K., Olivey, H., McElmurry, K., Gao, M., & Avis, P. (2019). Assessing Collaborative, Project-based Learning Models in Introductory Science Courses. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i1.26777

Ilma, S., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., & Saptasari, M. (2020). The correlation between science process skills and biology cognitive learning outcome of senior high school students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10794

Ilma, S., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., & Sari, M. S. (2022). Promoting students’ metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(1), 20–30.

Karmana, I. W. (2024). Literature Review: Efektivitas Metode Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Pendidikan Biologi. Educatoria : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.36312/educatoria.v4i4.325

Law, V. T. S., Yee, H. H. L., Ng, T. K. C., & Fong, B. Y. F. (2023). Transition from Traditional to Online Learning in Hong Kong Tertiary Educational Institutions During COVID-19 Pandemic. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(3), 1425–1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09603-z

Lazou, C., & Tsinakos, A. (2023). Critical Immersive-Triggered Literacy as a Key Component for Inclusive Digital Education. Education Sciences, 13(7), 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070696

Leow, F. T., & Neo, M. (2023). Critical Factors for Enhancing Students’ Collaborative Learning Experiences in a Project-based Connectivism Learning Environment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(7), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.7.21

Lestari, N., Paidi, P., & Suyanto, S. (2023). Ecopedagogy: Biology Learning Profile Of High School In Pulau Timor. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 14(2), 494–511. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2023.2.494.511

Markauskaite, L., Carvalho, L., & Fawns, T. (2023). The role of teachers in a sustainable university: From digital competencies to postdigital capabilities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10199-z

McSparron, J. I., Vanka, A., & Smith, C. C. (2019). Cognitive learning theory for clinical teaching. The Clinical Teacher, 16(2), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12781

Müller, F. A., & Wulf, T. (2024). Differences in Learning Effectiveness Across Management Learning Environments: A Cognitive Load Theory Perspective. Journal of Management Education, 48(4), 802–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629231200206

Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101

Ningsih, E. L. C., & Jayanti, U. N. A. D. (2022b). Discovery Blended Learning in Biology: Its Effectiveness on Self-Efficacy and Student Learning Outcomes in the New Normal Era. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v12i2.13748

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Ramdiah, S., Abidinsyah, A., Royani, M., Husamah, H., & Fauzi, A. (2020). South Kalimantan Local Wisdom-Based Biology Learning Model. European Journal of Educational Research, volume–9–2020(volume–9–issue–2–april–2020), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.639

Samuel, A. (2024). Science Subjects at Secondary School Level: Teachers’. 4(2), 127–139.

Sari, D. A., Rahmi, M., Aulia, R., & Rahmah, S. (2025). The Influence of the guided discovery learning model on student learning outcomes in biology learning: A literature study.

Sharma, V., Gupta, N. L., & Agarwal, A. K. (2023). Impact of ICT-Enabled Teaching–Learning Processes in Physical Sciences in Indian Higher Education in Light of COVID-19: A Comprehensive Overview. National Academy Science Letters, 46(5), 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-023-01225-y

Sholihah, N. M., & Amin, S. (2025). The Influence of Discovery Learning Model on Student Activeness and Sociology Learning Outcomes. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology, 6(1), 468–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v6i1.483

Sugiharto, B., Widoretno, S., Mumpuni, K. E., Prayitno, B. A., Rahmawati, A. B., Giyanti, A. R., Patmawati, K., Safrina, M., & Padmi, N. R. C. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for empowerment of science process skills in distance biology learning. 030003. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133275

Sugiharto, B., Widoretno, S., Prayitno, B. A., & Mumpuni, K. E. (2025). The potential of web-based learning “bioenial” to empower science process skills during the online biology learning. 020026. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0254237

Sukmawati̇, F., Setyosari̇, P., Sulton, S., & Purnomo, P. (2019). The Effect of Project-based Collaborative Learning and Social Skills on Learning Outcomes in Biology Learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1325–1344. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.630693

Supena, I., Darmuki, A., IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro, Indonesia, agus_darmuki@yahoo.co.id, Hariyadi, A., & IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro, Indonesia, ahmadhariyadi86@gmail.com. (2021). The Influence of 4C (Constructive, Critical, Creativity, Collaborative) Learning Model on Students’ Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a

Supratman, S., Zubaidah, S., Tarigan, M. R. M., & Azis, S. (2023). Contribution of critical thinking, science process skills towards learning outcomes based on gender. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(4), 1985. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.24927

Tamam, B., & Corebima, A. D. (2023). Implementing augmented reality to improve students’ biology learning outcomes: Gender-based effect. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(4), 2157. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.25645

Taylor, T. A. H., Kamel-ElSayed, S., Grogan, J. F., Hajj Hussein, I., Lerchenfeldt, S., & Mohiyeddini, C. (2022). Teaching in Uncertain Times: Expanding the Scope of Extraneous Cognitive Load in the Cognitive Load Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 665835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.665835

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657

Wang, X., & Yuan, D. (2022). An Empirical Analysis of Social Interaction in Online Teaching in Open Universities Based on Flipped Classroom. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3089239

Xiangze, Z., & Abdullah, Z. (2023). Station Rotation with Gamification Approach to Increase Students’ Engagement in Learning English Online. Arab World English Journal, (9), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.7

Xu, Z., Zhou, X., Watts, J., & Kogut, A. (2023). The effect of student engagement strategies in online instruction for data management skills. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10267–10284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11572-w

Yli-Panula, E., Jeronen, E., Lemmetty, P., & Pauna, A. (2018). Teaching Methods in Biology Promoting Biodiversity Education. Sustainability, 10(10), 3812. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103812

Yu, T., Dai, J., & Wang, C. (2023). Adoption of blended learning: Chinese university students’ perspectives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 390. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01904-7

Zawacki-Richter, O., & Jung, I. (Eds.). (2023). Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6

Zhong, T. C., Mat Saad, M. I., & Che Ahmad, C. N. (2022). Integrating technology-mediated learning in Biology education (Histology): A systematic literature review. Journal of ICT in Education, 9(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.1.8.2022

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

Enhancing biology learning outcomes through a blended-discovery learning model integrated with the Bioenial website. (2026). EDUSAINS, 18(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v18i1.50232