### META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF LEARNING CYCLE 5E MODEL ON PHYSICS LEARNING

#### Abstract

Along with the rapid development of science and technology, education is increasing. The improvement of education has encouraged the development of learning methods, techniques, approaches and models that allow students to play an active role in constructing their knowledge. One of them is the 5E learning cycle model. This study aims to analyse the effect of the 5E learning cycle model on physics learning in terms of education level, grade level, research type, subject matter and learning needs. The method used is a quantitative meta-analysis of SINTA accredited national articles, proceedings and international articles with the latest ten years, namely 2013-2023. Data analysis using effect size. The results of the analysis show that overall the learning cycle 5E model has an effect on physics learning with a high effect interpretation. Therefore, the learning cycle 5E model as a whole can improve students' learning achievement and can be used as an alternative in learning, especially physics. Thus, students can learn actively, effectively and can develop their creativity in solving problems. Thus, the 5E learning cycle model is very influential and effective in learning in general, especially in physics learning and can be applied to 21st century skills.

#### Keywords

#### Full Text:

PDF#### References

Akar, E. (2005). Effectiveness of 5E learning cycle model on students' understanding of acid-base concepts (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University).

Anderson, Lorin dan Krathwohl, David R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Anıl, Ö., Batdı, V., & Küçüközer, H. (2018). The effect of computer-supported education on student attitudes: A meta-analytical comparison for the period 2005-2015.

*Armys, S. M., & Derlina, D. (2021). Effects of Learning Cycle Model on Problem Solving Ability of Class X Students at Sma Negeri 10 Medan TP 2018/2019. INPAFI (Physics Learning Innovation), 9(3).

*Asriyadin, A., & Fikri, H. N. (2016). The Effect of Learning Cycle 5E Model on Physics Learning Outcomes of Class X Students of SMAN 1 Madapangga in the 2016/2017 Academic Year. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 6(2), 63-67

Ates, S. (2005). The effectiveness of the learning-cycle method on teaching DC circuits to prospective female and male science teachers. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(2), 213-227. doi:10.1080/02635140500266518

Ayaz, M. F., & Sekerci, H. (2015). The Effects of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Student's Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(4), 143-156.

Bevevino, M. M., Dengel, J., & Adams, K. (1999). Constructivist theory in the classroom internalizing: Concepts through inquiry learning. The Clearing House, 72(5), 275-278.

Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills a commissioned paper prepared for a workshop on exploring the intersection of science education and the development of 21st century skills. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.674.6559&rep=rep1&type =pdf

Çakir, N. K., & Güven, G. (2019). Effect of 5E learning model on academic achievement and attitude towards the science course: A meta-analysis study. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 48(2), 1111-1140.

Campbell, M. A. (2000). The effects of the 5E learning cycle model on students’ understanding of force and motion concept (Unpublished master’s thesis). Millersville University, Pennsylvania.

Ceylan, E. (2008). Effects of 5E learning cycle model on understanding of state of matter and solubility concepts.

Çetin Dindar, A. (2012). The effect of 5E learning cycle model on eleventh grade students’ conceptual understanding of acids and bases concepts and motivation to learn chemistry

Cohen, P. A. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlaum Associates.

Colburn, A., & Clough, M. P. (1997). Implementing the learning cycle. SCIENCE TEACHER-WASHINGTON-, 64, 30-33.

Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning? (pp. 1-23). Springer International Publishing.

Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., ... & Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical review physics education research, 12(1), 010130.

Duran, E., Duran, L., Haney, J., & Scheuermann, A. (2011). A learning cycle for all students. The Science Teacher, 78(3), 56-60.

Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 34(1), 56-87.

Erpan, A., Nanda, F. F., Augustini, M. C., & Desnita, D. (2021). Meta Analysis of the Effect of Co-operative Learning Models in Physics Subjects on Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Physics Coil, 4(2), 120-128.

Etkina, E. (2015). Millikan award lecture: Students of physics—Listeners, observers, or collaborative participants in physics scientific practices?.

*Fuadi, M., Arsyad, M., Arafah, K., & Asriyadin, A. (2020). The Effect of Learning Cycle 5E Model on Learning Motivation and Physics Learning Outcomes of Students of SMA Negeri 2 Woha Bima. Journal of Education MIPA, 10(2), 116-121.

Gilakjani, A. P., Lai-Mei, L., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teachers' use of technology and constructivism. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(4), 49.

Gregersen, T. (2020). Dynamic properties of language anxiety. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 67-87.

*Hartawati, Y., Harjono, A., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2020). Critical thinking skills of momentum and impulse in terms of learning style of students with learning cycle 5E model. ORBITA: Journal of Studies, Innovations and Applications of Physics Education, 6(1), 181-187.

Holmes, N. G., Wieman, C. E., & Bonn, D. A. (2015). Teaching critical thinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(36), 11199-11204.

*Irhamna, I., Rosdianto, H., & Murdani, E. (2017). Application of the 5E learning cycle model to improve students' critical thinking skills in static fluid material class VIII. Journal of Flux Physics: Scientific Journal of Physics FMIPA Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 14(1), 61-64.

Iskandar, A. M., Nurfadiah, D., & Yuli, W. I. (2021). Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Problem Based Learning Model on Students' Critical Thinking Ability. Journal of Physics and Technology Education (JPFT), 7(1).

*Isnani, H. Z., Indrawati, I., & Subiki, S. (2018). Learning Cycle 5E Model in Dynamic Fluid Learning in Senior High School (Study on Science Process Skills and Learning Outcomes). Journal of Physics Learning, 7(1), 38-45.

Jobrack, B. (2013). The 5E Instructional Model: Engage Explore Explain Evaluate Extend. From Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. https://www. mnheonline. com/secondaryscience. pdf.

Johnson, J. A. (2017). The kaiser's chemists: science and modernization in imperial Germany. UNC Press Books.

Kivunja, C. (2015). Exploring the pedagogical meaning and implications of the 4Cs" super skills" for the 21st century through Bruner's 5E lenses of knowledge construction to improve pedagogies of the new learning paradigm. Creative Education.

Khunaeni, L. N., Yuniarti, W. D., & Khalif, M. A. (2020). Development of a physics module assisted by augmented reality technology on sound wave materials for SMA/MA class XI. Physics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 83-94.

*Latifa, B. R. A., Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Harjono, A. (2017). The effect of the 5E learning cycle model (engage, explore, explain, elaboration, & evaluate) on the critical thinking skills of class X man 1 mataram students. Journal of Physics and Technology Education, 3(1), 61-67.

Lorsbach, A. W. (2002). The learning cycle as a tool for planning science instruction. Tersedia:(http://www. coe. ilstu. edu/scienceed/lorsbach/257lrcy. html).[12 Juni 2013].

*Lusiana, L., Munzil, M., & Yulianti, E. (2020). Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills Among Seventh Grade Students in the Solar System Topic through 5E Learning Cycle Model. In International Conference on Learning Innovation 2019 (ICLI 2019) (pp. 118-123). Atlantis Press.

Madu, B. C., & Amaechi, C. C. (2012). Effect of five-step learning cycle model on students’ understanding of concepts related to elasticity. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(9), 173-181.

*Maida, T., & Sirait, M. (2017). The Effect of Learning Cycle Learning Model on Student Learning Outcomes on Static Fluid Subject Matter in Class XI Semester II SMA Dharma Pancasila Medan TP 2016/2017. INPAFI (Physics Learning Innovation), 5(4).

Mundilarto. (2014). Kapita Selecta Physics Education. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UNY.

Musheno, B. V. & Lawson, A. E. (1999). Effects of learning cycle and traditional text on comprehension of science concepts by students at differing reasoning levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 23–37.

Mutammam, M. B. (2013). Mapping Piaget's cognitive development of high school students using Piaget's test of logical operations (TOL) in terms of gender differences. MATHEdunesa, 2(2).

*Nainggolan, C., & Sihombing, E. (2013). Effectiveness Of 5E Learning Cycle In Dynamic Electricty Class X SMA NEGERI 3 MEDAN. INPAFI (Physics Learning Innovation), 1(3).

*Namgyel, T., & Buaraphan, K. (2017). The development of simulation and game in 5E learning cycle to teach photoelectric effect for grade 12 students. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching (Vol. 18, No. 2).

Ngalimun. 2014. Learning Strategies and Models. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Presindo.

Nur, S. S., & Noviardila, I. (2021). Literature Review on the Effect of Learning Cycle Model on Integrated Thematic Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education Research, 2(1), 1-5.

Pabuccu, A., & Geban, O. (2015). Effect of 5E learning cycle instruction on misconceptions on acid-base concept. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 15(1), 191-206.

*Parhusip, A. J., & Ginting, E. M. (2014) Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Dengan Konvensional Pada Materi Pokok Listrik Dinamis Di Kelas X Semester II SMA Negeri 1 Percut Sei Tuan TA 2012/2013. INPAFI (Physics Learning Innovation).

Prayogi, S., Hidayat, S., & Armansyah, A. (2013). Implementation of the 5E Learning Model to Improve Students' Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Skills. Lensa: Journal of Physics Education, 1(1), 38-43.

*Purfiyansyah, R. P., Bektiarso, S., & Nuraini, L. (2023). Critical Thinking Skills and Physics Learning Outcomes in The 5E Learning Cycle Model with PhET Simulations. PILLAR OF PHYSICS EDUCATION, 16(2), 93-102.

*Rafiqah, F. A., & Wayong, M. (2019). Effect of learning cycle based on cognitive conflict method to improve understanding of physics concepts. Journal of Physics Education, 7(2), 133-139.

*Razak, Z. W., & Sudibyo, E. (2018). Application of Learning Cycle 5E Model to Improve Students' Concept Understanding on Liquid Pressure Material. PENSA: E-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 6(02).

Rodriguez, S., Allen, K., Harron, J., & Qadri, S. A. (2019). Making and the 5E learning cycle. The Science Teacher, 86(5), 48-55.

Şahin, Ç., Durukan, Ü. G., & Arıkurt, E. (2017). Effect of 5e teaching model on primary school pre-service teachers’ learning on some astronomy concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 148-162

*Sakdiah, H. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Sma. Relativity: Journal of Physics Learning Innovation Research, 1(1), 1-8.

Sani, M. M. R., Meha, A. M., & Nenotek, S. A. (2020). Application of the 5e learning cycle model to improve students' higher order thinking skills (HOTS) at smp adhyaksa 2 kupang in the 2018/2019 school year. Journal of Science and Science Education, 3(1), 15-23.

*Salam, A., Maharta, N., & Viyanti, V. (2013). Effectiveness of Learning Cycle 5 Phase Model on Students' Physics Learning Outcomes. None, 1(3), 117047.

Saraç, H. (2017). The effect of 5E learning model usage on students’ learning outcomes: meta-analysis study. The Journal of Limitless Education and Research, 2(2), 16-49.

*Sari, I. N., Saputri, D. F., & Beno, Y. (2016). Application of Learning Cycle 5E model in the subject matter of principal and derived quantities in class VII SMP Negeri 1 Sengah Temila. Scientific Journal of Physics Education Al-Biruni, 5(2), 280.

*Sarı, U., Hassan, A. H., Güven, K., & Şen, Ö. F. (2017). Effects of the 5E teaching model using interactive simulation on achievement and attitude in physics education. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(3).

*Sakdiah, H. (2019). The Effect of Learning Cycle Learning Model on Physics Learning Outcomes of Senior High School Students. Relativity: Journal of Physics Learning Innovation Research, 1(1), 1-8.

*Senidra, H. (2016). The Effect of Learning Cycle 5e Learning Model on Physics Learning Outcomes of Class X Man Prabumulih Students. Journal of Innovation and Learning Physics, 3(1), 66-72.

*Setyowidi, P., Lesmono, A. D., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). The Effect of Learning Cycle 5e Model with Experiment Method on Students' Physics Misconceptions in Physics Learning at SMK Farmasi Jember. Journal of Physics Learning, 3(2), 145-151.

Shoimin, A. (2014). Innovative Learning Models in the 2013 Curriculum. Bandung.

Suhardiman, S., Asni, N., Abrar, A. I. P., & Hasanah, U. (2022). Meta Analysis of the Effect of E-Learning PhET Simulation Media on Learning Outcomes in Physics Learning. Journal of Education MIPA, 12(3), 779-791.

Sugiyono. (2017). Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta

Sutrisno, L., Kresnadi, and Kartono. 2007. Learning Development IPA

Taşlıdere, E. (2015). A study investigating the effect of treatment developed by integrating the 5E and simulation on pre-service science teachers’ achievement in photoelectric effect. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 777-792.

Ural, G., & Bümen, N. (2016). A meta-analysis on instructional applications of constructivism in science and technology teaching: A sample of Turkey. Egitim ve Bilim, 41(185).

van Garderen, D., Decker, M., Juergensen, R., & Abdelnaby, H. (2020). Using the 5E instructional model in an online environment with pre-service special education teachers. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 23(1), 8.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v16i1.36339 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

### Refbacks

- There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 SALAM SALAM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

**This work is licensed under aÂ Creative CommonsÂ Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).EDUSAINS.Â P-ISSN:1979-7281**;

**E-ISSN:2443-1281**

Â

Â