HUBUNGAN TINGKAT PEMAHAMAN KARAKTERISTIK MORFOLOGI HEWAN DENGAN KEMAMPUAN MENGHAFAL NAMA LATIN HEWAN PADA SISWA KELAS X IPA SMA NEGERI 3 JEMBER

M Ubaidilah Hasan, Ira Nurmawati

Abstract


THE RELATIONSHIP OF STUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING LEVEL OF ANIMAL MORPHOLOGY CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE ABILITY TO MEMORIZE ANIMAL LATIN NAMES IN GRADE 10 IPA


Abstract

Animal taxonomy subjects often use animal's Latin names. Many students think that this subject is annoying because it is dominated by memorizing animal's Latin names, even though memorizing becomes a prerequisite for understanding. Meanwhile, most of the language materials memorized need an understanding before the memorizing process. This study aimed to find a relationship between the level of students' understanding of an animal's morphological characteristics and the ability to memorize animal's Latin names at the Xth grade of IPA students in SMAN 3 Jember. This study used a quantitative approach with a type of ex post facto. The test obtained the data. Then it was descriptively and inferentially analyzed by Kendall correlation. This research indicated that 56 students who answered test of the level of understanding animal's morphological characteristics and the ability to memorize animal's Latin names resulted in a correlation coefficient of score 0.673, and significance 0,000 < 0.05. Therefore, if the level of students’ understanding of an animal's morphological characteristics increased, the ability to memorize animal's Latin names at the Xth grade of IPA students in SMAN 3 Jember also increased, conversely.

Abstrak

Nama latin hewan sering digunakan dalam materi taksonomi hewan. Banyak siswa beranggapan bahwa materi tersebut membosankan karena didominasi oleh menghafal nama latin hewan, padahal menghafal menjadi prasyarat pemahaman. Sementara itu, sebagian besar materi bahasa yang dihafal membutuhkan pemahaman sebelum proses menghafal berlangsung. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah mengetahui hubungan tingkat pemahaman karakteristik morfologi hewan dengan kemampuan menghafal nama latin hewan pada siswa kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 3 Jember. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan jenis eks post facto. Data didapatkan menggunakan instrumen tes. Kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif dan inferensial menggunakan korelasi Kendall. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dari 56 siswa yang menjawab tes tingkat pemahaman karakteristik morfologi hewan dan kemampuan menghafal nama latin hewan menghasilkan koefisien korelasi 0,673 dan signifikansi 0,000 < 0,05. Dengan demikian, jika tingkat pemahaman karakteristik morfologi hewan meningkat, kemampuan menghafal nama latin hewan pada siswa kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 3 Jember juga meningkat, begitupula sebaliknya.

 


Keywords


understanding; morphological characteristic; memorizing; Latin name; animal; pemahaman; karakteristik morfologi; menghafal; nama latin; hewan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amri & Jafar, J. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Mahasiswa Menghafal Nama-Nama Latin di Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Angkatan 2014 Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare. Biotek 4(2): 262–277. https://doi.org/10.24252/jb.v4i2.1797

Anderson, L. W., Krathwhol, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich., P. R., Raths, J., & WIttrock, M. C. (2001). Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. New York: Longman.

Aryulina, D., Muslim, C., Manaf, S., & Winarni, E.W. (2006). Biologi 1 SMA dan MA untuk Kelas X. Jakarta: ESIS.

Chapman, A. (2003). Guidelines on Biological Nomenclature. Appendix 1: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27044.94088

Chen, Z., & Dong, X. (2010). Simultaneous Interpreting: Principles and Training. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 1(5): 714–716. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.5.714-716

Das, K.R., & Imon, A.H.M.R. (2016). A Brief Review of Tests for Normality. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5(1): 5-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.12

Duong, O.T.H., & Nguyen, H.T. (2006). Memorization and EFL Students’ Strategies at University Level in Vietnam. TESL-EJ 10(2): 1–21. http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej38/a4.pdf

Elgin, C.Z. (2016). Explaining Understanding: New Essays in Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science. 1–15. http://elgin.harvard.edu/undg/exemplification_in_understanding.pdf

Gordon, S. & Nicholas, J. (2005). Three Case Studies on the Role of Memorising in Learning and Teaching Mathematics. Psychology 3: 57–64. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED496891

Guerra-Garcia, J. M., Espinosa, F., & Garcia-Gomez, J.C. (2008). Trends in Taxonomy Today: An Overview About The Main Topics in Taxonomy. Zoologica Baeitca. 19(19): 15–49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269465472_Trends_in_taxonomy_today

Guimaraes, G., & Oliveira, I. (2016). Classifying: Comprehension Of Students And Teachers Of Primary School. 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education Hamburg. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330224420_CLASSIFYING_COMPREHENSION_OF_STUDENTS_AND_TEACHERS_OF_PRIMARY_SCHOOL

Hickman, C.P.Jr., Robert, L.S., Keen, S.L., Larson, A., I'Anson, H., & Eisenhour, D.J. (2008). Integrated Principles Of Zoology, Fourteenth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hornby, A.S. (2010). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University.

Hyder, I., & Bhamani, S. (2018). Bloom’s Taxonomy (Cognitive Domain) in Higher Education Settings: Reflection Brief. Journal of Education and Educational Development 3(2): 288–300. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14634.62406

Indiantono, A.S. (2015). Kiat-Kiat Mempertajam Daya Ingat Hafalan Pelajaran.Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Khamees, K.S. (2016). An Evaluative Study of Memorization as a Strategy for Learning English. International Journal of English Linguistics 6(4): 248–259. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n4p248

Khoshsima, H., & Nia, M.R. (2014). Summarizing Strategies and Writing Ability of Iranian Intermediate EFL Students. International Journal of Language and Linguistics 2(4): 263. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140204.14

Kuswana, W.S. (2014). Taksonomi Berfikir (Perkembangan Ragam Berfikir). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Liz, Bills, Dreyfus, T., Mason, J., Tsamir, P., Watson, A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2006). Exemplification in Mathematics Education. 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Leinhardt 2001: 126–154. http://users.mct.open.ac.uk/jhm3/PME30RF/PME30RFPaper.pdf

Prabowo, S.L., & Nurmaliyah, F. (2010). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press.

Rais, A.A., Hakim, L., & Sulistiawati, S. (2020). Pemahaman Konsep Siswa melalui Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Simulasi PhET. Physics Education Research Journal 2(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2020.2.1.5074

Sappaile, B.I. (2010). Konsep Penelitian Ex-Post Facto. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 1(2): 1–16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338630818_KONSEP_PENELITIAN_EX-POST_FACTO

Sari, A.Q., Sukestiyarno, Y.L., & Agoestanto, A. (2017). Batasan Prasyarat Uji Normalitas dan Uji Homogenitas pada Model Regresi Linear. Unnes Journal of Mathematics 6(2): 168–177. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujm/article/view/11887

Sezek, F. (2013). A New Approach in Teaching the Features and Classifications of. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) 3(2): 99–111. https://doi.org/10.13054/mije.13.25.3.2

Sprenger, M. (2011). Cara Mengajar Agar Siswa Tetap Ingat. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Stace C.A. (1981). Plant Taxonomy and Biosystematics. London: Edward Arnold.

Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujarweni, V.W. (2015). SPSS Untuk Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

Surya, M. (2016). Strategi Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Winston, J.E. (2000). Describing Species: Practical Taxonomic Procedure for Biologists. New York: Columbia University Press.

Zapino, T & Fitri, C. (2017). Kamus Nomenklatur (Flora & Fauna). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Zhang, J. (2019). Cognitive Functions of the Brain: Perception, Attention and Memory. Copyright ©IFM Lab. http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02863




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i1.13132 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 M Ubaidilah Hasan, Ira Nurmawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

EDUSAINS.  P-ISSN:1979-7281
;E-ISSN:2443-1281

 Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounterView My Stats

 

Â