Assessing the Acceptance and Trust in Student Information Systems Through a Modified TAM Perspective

Muhammad Taufik Nur Hidayat; Taqwa Hariguna; Dhanar Intan Surya Saputra

doi:10.15408/aism.v8i1.42324

Assessing the Acceptance and Trust in Student Information Systems Through a Modified TAM Perspective

Muhammad Taufik Nur Hidayat, Taqwa Hariguna, Dhanar Intan Surya Saputra

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has motivated universities to implement technology-based student information systems to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of student data management. This research seeks to evaluate acceptance and trust in student information systems at universities using a modified version of the Technology Acceptance Model, incorporating perceived trust as an additional variable. The study involved a sample of 200 active university students, with data analyzed using the structural equation modeling approach. Findings from the analysis show that both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use significantly impact students’ intention to adopt the system, which in turn influences actual system usage. Additionally, perceived trust emerged as a critical factor in reinforcing both the intention to use and the subsequent actual use of the student information system. The results indicate that the intention to use the system acts as an essential mediator in the relationships between students’ perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, trust, and their actual usage behavior. These results have significant implications for universities aiming to improve the adoption of student information systems. Enhancing user experience, building system trust, and ensuring robust security should be prioritized in the development and refinement of such systems. By focusing on these aspects, institutions can foster higher acceptance and sustained usage, leading to more effective student data management and a better overall educational experience.

Keywords

SEM, student site, TAM, UNPERBA, user experience

Full Text:

PDF

References

S. D. Lestari, F. M. Leon, S. Widyastuti, N. A. Brabo, and A. H. P. K. Putra, “Antecedents and consequences of innovation and business strategy on performance and competitive advantage of SMEs,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 365–378, 2020, doi: 10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO6.365.

J. John and R. Thakur, “Long term effects of service adaptations made under pandemic conditions: the new ‘post COVID-19’ normal,” Eur. J. Mark., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1679–1700, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1108/EJM-08-2020-0607.

S. Kimiagari and N. S. Asadi Malafe, “The role of cognitive and affective responses in the relationship between internal and external stimuli on online impulse buying behavior,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 61, no. June 2020, p. 102567, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102567.

I.-L. Wu and J.-L. Chen, “An Extension of Trust and TAM Model with TPB in the Initial Adoption of Online Tax: An Empirical Study,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 784–808, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003.

M. C. Lee, “Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model,” Comput. Educ., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 506–516, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002.

M. F. Farah, M. J. S. Hasni, and A. K. Abbas, “Mobile-banking adoption: empirical evidence from the banking sector in Pakistan,” Int. J. Bank Mark., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1386–1413, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJBM-10-2017-0215.

S.-C. Chen, S.-C. Liu, S.-H. Li, and D. C. Yen, “Understanding the Mediating Effects of Relationship Quality on Technology Acceptance: An Empirical Study of E-Appointment System,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 37, no. 6, p. 9981, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10916-013-9981-0.

M. Amin, S. Rezaei, and M. Abolghasemi, “User satisfaction with mobile websites: the impact of perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use PEOU and trust,” Nankai Bus. Rev. Int., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 258–274, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1108/NBRI-01-2014-0005.

P. Thusi and D. K. Maduku, “South African millennials’ acceptance and use of retail mobile banking apps: An integrated perspective,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 111, no. July 2019, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106405.

K. Owusu Kwateng, K. A. Osei Atiemo, and C. Appiah, “Acceptance and Use of Mobile Banking: an Application of UTAUT2,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 118–151, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-03-2018-0055.

T. Zhang, C. Lu, and M. Kizildag, “Banking ‘on-the-go’: Examining Consumers Adoption of Mobile Banking Services,” Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 279–295, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJQSS-07-2017-0067.

D. Chawla and H. Joshi, “Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India – An empirical study,” Int. J. Bank Mark., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1590–1618, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJBM-09-2018-0256.

M. A. Nugroho and M. Andryzal Fajar, “Effects of Technology Readiness Towards Acceptance of Mandatory Web-Based Attendance System,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 124, pp. 319–328, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.161.

W. Rafdinal and W. Senalasari, “Predicting the adoption of mobile payment applications during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Bank Mark., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 984–1002, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJBM-10-2020-0532.

Y. W. Chang and J. Chen, “What motivates customers to shop in smart shops? The impacts of smart technology and technology readiness,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 58, no. October 2020, p. 102325, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102325.

M. Sholikah and S. Sutirman, “How technology acceptance model (TAM) factors of electronic learning influence education service quality through students’ satisfaction,” TEM J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1221–1226, 2020, doi: 10.18421/TEM93-50.

C. K. Dewi, Z. Mohaidin, and M. A. Murshid, “Determinants of online purchase intention: a PLS-SEM approach: evidence from Indonesia,” J. Asia Bus. Stud., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 281–306, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/JABS-03-2019-0086.

A. Wibowo, S. C. Chen, U. Wiangin, Y. Ma, and A. Ruangkanjanases, “Customer behavior as an outcome of social media marketing: The role of social media marketing activity and customer experience,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13010189.

P. Luarn and H. H. Lin, “Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 873–891, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003.

A. A. Alalwan, Y. K. Dwivedi, N. P. P. Rana, and M. D. Williams, “Consumer Adoption of Mobile Banking in Jordan,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 118–139, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-04-2015-0035.

G. A. Putri, A. K. Widagdo, and D. Setiawan, “Analysis of financial technology acceptance of peer to peer lending (P2P lending) using extended technology acceptance model (TAM),” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 100027, 2023.

A. S. Al-Adwan, N. Li, A. Al-Adwan, G. A. Abbasi, N. A. Albelbisi, and A. Habibi, “Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 15381–15413, 2023.

H. Abuhassna et al., “Trends on using the technology acceptance model (TAM) for online learning: a bibliometric and content analysis,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 2023.

A. Alsyouf et al., “The use of a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to predict patients’ usage of a personal health record system: The role of security, privacy, and usability,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 1347, 2023.

G. Premkumar and A. Bhattacherjee, “Explaining information technology usage: A test of competing models,” Omega, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 64–75, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.002.

J. Iskandar, A. Prasetya, Y. K. Sari, and T. A. Cahyono, “Analisis Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Akademik Universitas Bhinneka Pgri Menggunakan Integrasi Model Tpb Dan Tam,” JIPI (Jurnal Ilm. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran Inform., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 254–263, 2022, doi: 10.29100/jipi.v7i1.2739.

S. K. Sharma, “Integrating cognitive antecedents into TAM to explain mobile banking behavioral intention: A SEM-neural network modeling,” Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 815–827, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10796-017-9775-x.

J. C. Ho, C.-G. Wu, C.-S. Lee, and T.-T. T. Pham, “Factors affecting the behavioral intention to adopt mobile banking: An international comparison,” Technol. Soc., vol. 63, p. 101360, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101360.

C. Lazim, N. D. B. Ismail, and M. Tazilah, “Application of technology acceptance model (TAM) towards online learning during covid-19 pandemic: Accounting students perspective,” Int. J. Bus. Econ. Law, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2021.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/aism.v8i1.42324

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

EDITORIAL ADDRESS:

Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Science and Technology,
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Faculty of Science and Technology Building, 3rd Floor, 1st Campus, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 95, Ciputat Timur, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Banten 15412, Indonesia.
Tlp/Fax: +622174019 25/+62217493315.
E-mail: aism.journal@apps.uinjkt.ac.id, Website: https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/aism

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.