PEMAHAMAN GURU KIMIA SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS TENTANG PENILAIAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA
Abstract
HIGH SCHOOL CHEMISTRY TEACHERS' UNDERSTANDING OF HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION
Abstract
Teachers play an essential role in attempts to develop students' higher-order thinking skills through the implementation of classroom assessments. This study explores chemistry teachers' understanding of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) assessments, how they implement the assessments, and what obstacles they face. This study employed a qualitative approach that involved 12 high-school chemistry teachers in South Jakarta. Data collection was conducted in August and September 2019 through semi-structured interviews. The findings of this study show that the chemistry teachers have a different understanding of higher-order thinking assessments. The majority of teachers associate HOTS with the three highest levels of the cognitive dimension of Revision of Bloom's taxonomy, critical thinking, and problem-solving. The levels of implementation of HOTS assessments among teachers vary. Among obstacles faced by the teachers are the lack of teachers' knowledge and experience in applying HOTS assessments, variability in students' cognitive abilities, the scarcity of learning facilities, and the lack of guidance and training about HOTS assessments in chemistry.
Abstrak
Guru memegang peranan penting dalam upaya mengembangkan kemampuan siswa dalam berpikir tingkat tinggi melalui penerapan penilaian kelas.Penelitian ini menggali pemahaman guru kimia tentang penilaian kemampuan berpikir tinggi tinggi (HOTS), penerapannya, dan hambatan-hambatan yang dihadapi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang melibatkan 12 orang guru kimia SMA di Jakarta Selatan. Pengumpulan data dilakukan pada bulan Agustus dan September 2019 melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur. Temuan dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa para guru kimia memiliki pemahaman yang beragam tentang penilaian HOTS. Mayoritas guru mengaitkan penilaian HOTS dengan tiga jenjang tertinggi dimensi kognitif pada taksonomi Bloom yang telah direvisi, berpikir kritis, dan penyelesaian masalah. Tingkat penerapan penilaian HOTS di kalangan guru bervariasi. Hambatan yang dihadapi para guru Kimia SMA dalam melaksanakan penilaian HOTS, antara lain keterbatasan pengetahuan dan pengalaman guru dalam menerapkan penilaian HOTS, kemampuan kognitif siswa yang bervariasi, keterbatasan fasilitas pembelajaran, dan kurangnya panduan dan pelatihan tentang penilaian HOTS untuk mata pelajaran kimia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2015). Conceptualizing and assessing higher-order thinking in reading. Theory into Practice, 54(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1044367
Aksela, M. (2005). Supporting meaningful chemistry learning and higher-order thinking through computer-sssisted inquiry : A design research approach. In University of Helsinki.
Anderson, L. W. (2014). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Teaching thinking skills in context-based learning: teachers’ challenges and assessment knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7
Azrai, E. P., Suryanda, A., Wulaningsih, R. D., & Sumiyati, U. K. (2020). Kemampuan berpikir kritis dan literasi sains siswa SMA di Jakarta Timur. EDUSAINS, 12(1), 89–97.
Baird, J.-A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Cetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, O. (2017). Conceptual understanding of acids and bases concepts and motivation to learn chemistry. Journal of Educational Research, 110(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1039422
Čtrnáctová, H., Čtrnáctová, L., & Šmejkal, P. (2015). IBSE in chemistry education - Testing students’ skills and teacher training. Lumat: International Journal of Math, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 556–567. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.v3i4.1023
Dahlan, D., Permana, L., & Oktariani, M. (2020). Teacher’s competence and difficulties in constructing HOTS instruments in economics subject. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 111–119.
Driana, E., & Ernawati. (2019). Teachers’ understanding and practices in assessing higher order thinking skills at primary schools. Acitya: Journal of Teaching & Education, 1(2), 110–118.
Erduran, S., El Masri, Y., Cullinane, A., & Ng, Y. P. D. (2020). Assessment of practical science in high stakes examinations: a qualitative analysis of high performing English-speaking countries. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1769876
Fensham, P. J., & Bellocchi, A. (2013). Higher order thinking in chemistry curriculum and its assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.003
FitzPatrick, B., & Schulz, H. (2015). Do curriculum outcomes and assessment activities in science encourage higher order thinking? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(2), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1014074
Fulmer, G. W., Lee, I. C. H., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Multi-level model of contextual factors and teachers’ assessment practices: an integrative review of research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1017445
Helmawati. (2019). Pembelajaran dan Penilaian Berbasis HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Iskandar, D., & Senam, S. (2015). Studi Kemampuan Guru Kimia Sma Lulusan Uny Dalam Mengembangkan Soal Uas Berbasis Hots. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i1.4533
Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching to the test...or testing to teach: Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage greater conceptual understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9
Martínez, R. S., Harris, B., & McClain, M. B. (2014). Practices That Promote English Reading for English Learners (ELs). Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 24(2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.903192
McNeill, M., Gosper, M., & Xu, J. (2012). Assessment choices to target higher order learning outcomes: The power of academic empowerment. Research in Learning Technology, 20(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.17595
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.
Overman, M., Vermunt, J. D., Meijer, P. C., Bulte, A. M. W., & Brekelmans, M. (2013). Textbook questions in context-based and traditional chemistry curricula analysed from a content perspective and a learning activities perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2954–2978. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.680253
Rapih, S., & Sutaryadi, S. (2018). Perpektif guru sekolah dasar terhadap Higher Order Tinking Skills (HOTS): pemahaman, penerapan dan hambatan. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v8i1.2560
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Schulz, H., & FitzPatrick, B. (2016). Teachers’ understandings of critical and higher order thinking and what this means for their teaching and assessments. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–86.
Toledo, S., & Dubas, J. M. (2016). Encouraging higher-order thinking in general chemistry by scaffolding student learning using Marzano’s taxonomy. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00184
Yin, X., & Buck, G. A. (2015). There is another choice: an exploration of integrating formative assessment in a Chinese high school chemistry classroom through collaborative action research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(3), 719–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9572-5
Zohar, A., & Agmon, V. A. (2018). Raising test scores vs. teaching higher order thinking (HOT): senior science teachers’ views on how several concurrent policies affect classroom practices. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1395332.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i2.13613 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Nurmawati Nurmawati, Elin Driana, Ernawati Ernawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
EDUSAINS. P-ISSN:1979-7281;E-ISSN:2443-1281
Â
Â