WHICH ONE IS BETTER HANDS ON OR PHET SIMULATION ON HARMONIC OSCILLATION

Adam Malik, Uswatun Khasanah, Rena Denya Agustina, Rizki Zakwandi

Abstract


MANA YANG LEBIH BAIK EKSPERIMEN ATAU SIMULASI PHET PADA GERAK HARMONIK

 

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mana yang lebik baik antara keterlaksanaan pembelajaran pendekatan saintifik kelas yang menggunakan hand on berupa media KIT dengan simulasi PhET dan peningkatan hasil belajar kognitif siswa diantara kedua kelas tersebut pada getaran harmonis. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah quasi-experiment dengan desain randomized pretest-posttest comparison group. Populasi penelitian adalah kelas X MIA di MAN Cimahi. Sampel penelitian adalah siswa kelas X MIA 1 yang menggunakan hand on berupa media KIT dan kelas X MIA 3 yang menggunakan simulasi PhET. Sampel dipilih dengan teknik random sampling dengan jumlah siswa masing-masing 35 orang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan keterlaksanaan pembelajaran pendekatan saintifik dan peningkatan hasil belajar kognitif siswa di kelas yang menggunakan hand on berupa media KIT lebih baik dibandingkan simulasi PhET. Hal ini dapat disimpulkan pembelajaran pendekatan saintifik yang menggunakan hand on berupa media KIT lebih baik dibandingkan simulasi PhET.dalam pelaksanaan maupun dalam meningkatkan hasil kognitif siswa pada getaran harmonis. Dengan demikian, penggunaan media KIT dan simulasi PhET dapat diimplementasikan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif siswa pada topik fisika lainnya.

Abstract

This study aims to determine which is better between the implementation of classroom scientific approach that uses hand-on in the form of KIT media with PhET simulations and improvement of students' cognitive learning outcomes between the two classes on harmonic oscillation. The method used in this study is a quasi-experiment with a randomized pretest-posttest comparison group design. The study population is class X MIA at MAN Cimahi. The sample of the research is class X MIA 1 students who use hand on KIT media and class X MIA 3 using PhET simulations. Samples were selected by random sampling technique with 35 students each. The results showed the implementation of the scientific approach to learning and the improvement of cognitive learning outcomes of students in the classroom using hand-on in the form of KIT media is better than the PhET simulation. It can be concluded that learning a scientific approach that uses hand-on in the form of KIT media is better than a PhET simulation. Both in implementation and in improving students' cognitive outcomes in harmonic oscillation. Thus, the use of KIT media and PhET simulations can be implemented to improve student cognitive learning outcomes on other physics topics.

 


Keywords


Cognitive Learning Achievement, KIT Media, PhET Simulation, Harmonic Oscillation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, N. E. 2015. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 103(3), 152–153.

Ajredini, F., Izairi, N., & Zajkov, O. 2017. Real experiments versus phet simulations for better high-school students’ understanding of electrostatic charging. European Journal of Physics Education, 5(1), 59–70.

Asyhari, A., & Silvia, H. 2016. Pengembangan media pembelajaran berupa buletin dalam bentuk buku saku untuk pembelajaran IPA terpadu. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 5(1), 1–13.

Batong, J.S.T & Wilujeng, I.Series, C. 2018. Developing web-students’ worksheet based on inquiry training for increase science literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 012021.

Chang, C., Lai, C., & Hwang, G. 2017. Trends and research issues of mobile learning studies in nursing education: A review of academic publications from 1971 to 2016. Computers & Education, 1–45.

Chatfield, C. 2018. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis. Routledge.

Copriady, J. 2015. Self- motivation as a mediator for teachers’ readiness in applying ICT in teaching and learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 699–708.

Daryanto. 2013. Media Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Fhadhila, F., Ertikanto, C., & Rosidin, U. 2018. Developing student worksheet of temperature and heat based on scientific process skill. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(1), 21–32.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415.

Hake, R. R. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66(1), 64-74.

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. 2017. What works and why? Student perceptions of “useful” digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579.

Jauhari, T., Hikmawati, H., & Wahyudi, W. 2017. Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah berbantuan media phet terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa kelas X SMAN 1 Gunungsari tahun pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2(1), 7.

Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., & Megowan-Romanowicz, C. 2017. Embodied science and mixed reality: How gesture and motion capture affect physics education. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 24.

Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D. A., & Savio-Ramos, C. 2016. Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: Centripetal force. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1819.

Jua, S. K., Sarwanto, & Sukarmin. 2018. The profile of students’ problem-solving skill in physics across interest program in the secondary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(1), 12027.

Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., Hasopa, Y., Sutrisno, A. D., & Suhendi, E. 2016. The Influence of using momentum and impulse computer simulation to senior high school students’ concept mastery. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 739(1), 12060.

Kexel, C., Mälzer, M., & Moll, J. 2018. Connecting physics to ICT: Demonstrating a “data drawbridge” by means of guided ultrasound waves. European Journal of Physics, 39, 1–9.

Lavery, S. D., & Coffey, A. 2016. Service-learning: Promoting the development of the graduate professional standards in pre-service secondary teachers. In Educational Confrence Papers (pp. 1–12). Perth: Curtin University.

Lepiyanto, A., & Pratiwi, D. 2015. Pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis inkuiri terintegrasi nilai karakter peduli lingkungan pada materi ekosistem. bioedukasi (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 6(2).

Lestari, I. 2015. Pengaruh waktu belajar dan minat belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3(2).

Lestari, S. H. S. 2016. Peningkatan prestasi belajar ipa materi energi panas dan bunyi melalui metode diskusi kelompok di kelas IV SD Negeri Bintoro 16 semester 2 tahun pelajaran 2015/2016. Malih Peddas (Majalah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar), 6(1).

Liu, C., Wu, C., Wong, W., & Lien, Y. 2017. Computers & education scientific modeling with mobile devices in high school physics labs. Computers & Education, 105, 44–56.

Malik, A. 2010. Model pembelajaran inkuiri dengan menggunakan virtual laboratory dan real laboratory untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada topik listrik dinamis. Tesis. Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Malik, A., Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., & Permanasari, A. 2017. Learning experience on transformer using hot lab for pre-service physics teacher’s. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012140.

Mujadi, S., & Wiratno. (1994). Materi Pokok Design dan Pembuatan Alat Praktikum IPA. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Oktafiani, P., Subali, B., & Edie, S. S. 2017. Pengembangan alat peraga kit optik serbaguna (AP-KOS) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 189.

Panero, M., & Aldon, G. 2016. How teachers evolve their formative assessment practices when digital tools are involved in the classroom. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 70–86.

Prastowo, A. 2017. Urgensi waktu belajar dalam pendidikan karakter di SD/MI: Studi analisis isi terhadap Permendibud Nomor 23 Tahun 2017. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 4(2), 129.

Purnamawati, D., Ertikanto, C., & Suyatna, A. 2017. Keefektifan lembar kerja siswa berbasis inkuiri untuk menumbuhkan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 6(2), 209–219.

Randall, E., & Emily. 2016. Making science simulations accessible for students with vision impairments. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’16 (pp. 122–127). New York, USA: ACM Press.

Saregar, A. 2016. Pembelajaran pengantar fisika kuantum dengan memanfaatkan media phet simulation dan lkm melalui pendekatan saintifik: Dampak pada minat dan penguasaan konsep mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 5(1), 53.

Saregar, A., Latifah, S., & Sari, M. 2016. Efektivitas model pembelajaran cups : dampak terhadap kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi peserta didik Madrasah Aliyah Mathla ’ Ul Anwar Gisting Lampung. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 5(2), 233–243.

Setiadi, R., & Muflika, A. A. 2015. Eksplorasi pemberdayaan courseware simulasi phet untuk membangun keterampilan proses sains siswa SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 17(2), 258.

Setiawan, A., Malik, A., Suhandi, A., & Permanasari, A. 2018. Effect of higher order thinking laboratory on the improvement of critical and creative thinking skills. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 306(1).

Stowell, J. R. 2015. Computers & education use of clickers vs mobile devices for classroom polling. Computers & Education, 82, 329–334.

Suhendi, H., Mulhayatiah, D., & Zakwandi, R. 2018. Effect of dynamics rotation worksheet on student critical thinking skills reviewed from IQ score. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 7(1).

Sutrisno, V. L. P., & Siswanto, B. T. 2016. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran praktik kelistrikan otomotif SMK di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 6(1), 111.

Torrente, J., Borro-Escribano, B., Freire, M., del Blanco, A., Marchiori, E. J., Martinez-Ortiz, I., … Fernandez-Manjon, B. 2014. Development of game-like simulations for procedural knowledge in healthcare education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(1), 69–82.

Wang, J.-Y., Wu, H.-K., Chien, S.-P., Hwang, F.-K., & Hsu, Y.-S. 2015. Designing applications for physics learning: facilitating high school students’ conceptual understanding by using tablet PCS. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(4), 441–458.

Weatherspoon, D. L., Phillips, K., & Wyatt, T. H. 2015. Effect of electronic interactive simulation on senior bachelor of science in nursing students’ critical thinking and clinical judgment skills. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(2), 126–133.

Wibawa, & Mukti. 1993. Media Pengajaran. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Wibowo, F. C., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Ruhiyat, Y., & Darman, D. R. 2018. Microscopic Virtual Media ( MVM ) in physics learning to build a scientific conception and reduce misconceptions: A case study on students ’ understanding of the thermal expansion of solids, (January).

Wickham, C. M., Girvan, C., & Tangney, B. 2016. Constructionism and microworlds as part of a 21 st century learning activity to impact student engagement and confidence in physics. In 4th International Constructionism Conference 2016, (pp 34-41), Bangkok, Thailand.

Zakrajsek. 2018. Reframing the lecture versus active learning debate: Suggestions for a new way forward. Education in the Health Professions, 1(1), 1.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i2.10571 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


@ EDUSAINS.  P-ISSN:1979-7281;E-ISSN:2443-1281

This is an open access article under CC-BY-SA license

 

Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter View My Stats