Pluralisasi dan Peredaran Pengetahuan dalam Studi Hadis Barat dan Indonesia, 2010–2020

Abdul Hakim Wahid; Aep  Saepulloh; Muh. Akbar  Nasrulah

doi:10.15408/refleksi.v25.i1.50560

Authors

Abdul Hakim Wahid Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta
Aep Saepulloh Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta
Muh. Akbar Nasrulah Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/refleksi.v25.i1.50560

Keywords:

Comparative hadith studies, Western, Indonesia, Knowledge circulation, Epistemic dialogue

Abstract

This article compares selected works in Western Islamic Studies and Indonesian hadith scholarship published between 2010 and 2020 to examine changes in research objects, evidentiary practices, and knowledge circulation in contemporary hadith studies. Previous scholarship has largely framed their relationship through debates on hadith authenticity, often overlooking shifts in research objects and analytical procedures. Using a comparative literature-based approach, this study analyzes selected publications in terms of their research objects, sources, forms of evidence, and modes of inference. The findings show that both academic environments experienced a broadening of research objects and procedures. Within Islamic Studies, hadith research expanded beyond source criticism to include commentary traditions, manuscripts, transmission, authority, and reception. In Indonesia, similar developments are reflected in methodological debates, mappings of scholarship and publication trends, curriculum studies, and living hadith research. Differences in publication language, genre, and publishing channels indicate patterns of asymmetrical knowledge circulation, although the extent of such asymmetry is not measured in this study. The findings suggest that the relationship between the two environments is better understood as a process of intellectual exchange and adaptation rather than merely a response to debates over authenticity.

References

Abu-Alabbas, Belal, Michael Dann, and Christopher Melchert, eds. Modern Hadith Studies: Continuing Debates and New Approaches. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020.

Alatas, Syed Farid. “Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in the Social Sciences.” Current Sociology 51, no. 6 (November 2003): 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921030516003.

Albab, Muhammad Ulul. “Menyoal Koneksitas Kritik Hadits Ignaz Goldziher Dan Joseph Schacht.” An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies 14, no. 1 (April 2021): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v14i1.42.

Ali, Muhamad. “Kajian Naskah Dan Kajian Living Qur’an Dan Living hadith.” Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 4, no. 2 (December 2015): 147–67. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v4i2.2391.

———. “The Current Studies of Muhammad and His Hadith in the West and Indonesia.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Qur’an and Hadith Studies (ICQHS 2017), 2018, 7–16. https://doi.org/10.2991/icqhs-17.2018.2.

Amin, Kamaruddin. “Muslim Western Scholarship of Hadith and Western Scholar Reaction: A Study on Fuat Sezgin’s Approach to Hadith Scholarship.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 46, no. 2 (2008): 253–77. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2008.462.253-277.

Andreas Görke, Harald Motzki, and Gregor Schoeler. “First Century Sources for the Life of Muḥammad? A Debate.” Der Islam 89, nos. 1–2 (2012): 2–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/islam-2012-0002.

Blecher, Joel. “Revision in the Manuscript Age: New Evidence of Early Versions of Ibn Ḥajar’s Fatḥ al-Bārī.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 76, no. 1 (2017): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/690766.

———. Said the Prophet of God: Hadith Commentary across a Millennium. Oakland: University of California Press, 2018.

———. “Scholars, Spice Traders, and Sultans: Arguing over the Alms-Tax in the Mamluk Era.” Islamic Law and Society 27, no. 1/2 (2020): 53–82.

Bowen, Glenn A. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2 (August 2009): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.

Brown, Daniel W., ed. Wiley Blackwell Concise Companion to the Hadith. Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2020.

Brown, Jonathan A. C. Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet’s Legacy. Oneworld Publications, 2014.

———. “The Rules of Matn Criticism: There Are No Rules.” Islamic Law and Society 19, no. 4 (2012): 356–96.

Canagarajah, A. Suresh. A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjn6c.

Connell, Raewyn. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. London: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117346.

Davidson, Garrett. Carrying on the Tradition: A Social and Intellectual History of Hadith Transmission across a Thousand Years. Islamic History and Civilization 160. Leiden: Brill, 2020.

Duderija, Adis, ed. The Sunna and Its Status in Islamic Law: The Search for a Sound Hadith. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

Eisenstadt, S. N. “Multiple Modernities in an Age of Globalization.” The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie 24, no. 2 (1999): 283–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341732.

Görke, Andreas. “The Relationship between Maghāzī and Ḥadīth in Early Islamic Scholarship.” Bulletin of SOAS 74, no. 2 (June 2011): 171–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X11000012.

Huda, Nailil, and Ade Pahrudin. “Orientasi Kajian Hadis Kontemporer Indonesia (Studi Artikel E-Jurnal Dalam Portal Moraref 2015-2017).” Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama Dan Filsafat 17, no. 2 (December 2018): 169–92. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v17i2.10204.

Idri. Hadis dan Orientalis: Perspektif Ulama Hadis dan Para Orientalis Hadis Nabi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Ismail, M. Syuhudi. Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 2007.

Masrur, Ali. “Diskursus Metodologi Studi Hadis Kontemporer Analisa Komparatif Antara Pendekatan Tradisional Dan Pendekatan Revisionis.” Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 1, no. 2 (2012): 237–49. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v1i2.1326.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Edisi revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.

Motzki, Harald, Nicolet Boekhoff-van der Voort, and Sean W. Anthony. Analysing Muslim Traditions: Studies in Legal, Exegetical and Maghāzī Ḥadīth. Leiden: Brill, 2010.

Palinkas, Lawrence A., Sarah M. Horwitz, Carla A. Green, Jennifer P. Wisdom, Naihua Duan, and Kimberly Hoagwood. “Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.” Administration and Policy in Mental Health 42, no. 5 (September 2015): 533–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.

Patel, Youshaa. “‘Whoever Imitates a People Becomes One of Them’: A Hadith and Its Interpreters.” Islamic Law and Society 25, no. 4 (2018): 359–426.

Reinhart, A. Kevin. “Juynbolliana, Gradualism, the Big Bang, and Ḥadīth Study in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 130, no. 3 (2010): 413–44.

Said, Edward W. Orientalism. 25th anniversary edition with a new preface by the author. New York: Vintage Books, 2014.

Silfiani, Silfiani, Abdul Hakim Wahid, and Ummi Kalsum. “Testing the Consistency of G.H.A. Juynboll’s Determination of Common Link Narrators: An Analysis of the Encyclopedia of Canonical Hadith.” Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam 5, no. 1 (March 2026): 307–24. https://doi.org/10.54150/alirsyad.v5i1.1057.

Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8, no. 1 (1969): 3–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504188.

Sukron, Mokhamad. “Relasi Barat Dan Islam Dalam Kajian Hadis.” Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis 5, no. 1 (2019): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.21043/riwayah.v5i1.5040.

Suryadilaga, Muhammad Alfatih. “Ragam Studi Hadis Di PTKIN Indonesia Dan Karakteristiknya: Studi Atas Kurikulum IAIN Bukittinggi, IAIN Batusangkar, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Dan IAIN Jember.” Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 4, no. 2 (December 2015): 215–47. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v4i2.2394.

Yaqub, Ali Mustafa. Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1995.

Yaşar, İsmail, and Ayşe Gültekin. “Muhammad Mustafa Al-A‘Zamî’s Joseph Schacht Criticism And Its Effects on Turkish Academy.” RUSUH Uşak Üniversitesi İslami İlimler Fakültesi Dergisi 2, no. 2 (2022): 200–230. https://doi.org/https://izlik.org/JA55GR62ED.

Zed, Mestika. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2025.

Zuhri, Muh. “Perkembangan Kajian Hadis Kesarjanaan Barat.” Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam 16, no. 2 (2015): 215–34. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v16i2.3182.