Peta Perdebatan Akademik dalam Kajian Hadis

Abdul Hakim Wahid

Abstract


Knowing the map of studies in science fieldwill make easier for researchers to conduct further studies. Therefore, in every scientific work, a literature study is required, because it can describe the academic debates between scholars on a theory, including in the hadith studies. This paper deals to map out the theories discovered by the orientalists and the rebuttal of scholars, systematically. The results of this study can be used by students of Islamic studies of hadith concentrationas a theoretical framework and as a reference in coursesof Western studies on the hadith.

Keywords


Academic, Discussion, Hadith

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbott, Nabia. Studies in Arabic Literary Papyri, II Qur`anic Commentary and Tradition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.

Amin, Kamaruddin. “Book Review: The Origns of Islamic Jurispundence Meccan Fiqh Before the Classical Schools”, al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 41, 2003.

----------. Isnad Cum Matn Analysis in Search of a New Metodology, Jakarta: Pustaka Mapan, 2008.

----------. Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadīth. Jakarta: Mizan Hikmah, 2009.

----------. “Muslim Western Scholarship Of Ḥadīth And Western Scholar Reaction: A Study on Fuat Sezgin’s Approach to Ḥadīth Scholarship” Al-Jāmi‘ah, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2008.

----------. “Nāṣiruddīn al-Albānī on Muslim's Ṣaḥīḥ: A Critical Study of His Method”, Islamic Law and Society, Vol. 11, No. 2 (2004).

Western Methods of Dating vis-a-vis Ulumul Hadis Refleksi Metodologis atas Diskursus Kesarjanaan Hadis Islam dan Barat, Makasar, UIN Alauddin, 2010.

Arif, Samsudin. “Gugatan Orientalis Terhadap Hadis dan Gaungnya Di Dunia Islam“ Jurnal al-Insan no.2 vol.I, 2005.

al-’Aẓamī, M. Mustafa. On Schacht’sOrigins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, Lahore: Suhail Academi, 2004.

Beg, Herbert. The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam: The Authenticity of Muslim Literature from the Formative Period, Surrey: Curzon Press, 2000.

Burton, John. “Qur’ān And Sunnah: A Case Of Cultural Disjunction” Methode and Theory in the Study of Islamic Origins vol.49 Ed. Herbert Beg, Leiden: Brill, 2003.

Deraman, Fauzi dan Muna, Arif Chasanul. “Kritik Terhadap Metode Kajian Sanad GHA Juynboll”, Al-Bayan Journal of al-Qur’an & al-Ḥadīth vol. 5 Mei 2007.

Esposito, J. Islām: The Straight Path, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Goldziher, Ignaz. Muslim Studies, tran. C. R. Barber and S. M. Stern, London: George Allen Press, 1971.

al-Ḥalby, Nūr al-Dīn Muhammad ‘Iṭr. Manhaj al-Naqd fī ‘Ulum al-Ḥadīth, Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 1997.

Ismail, M. Syuhudi. Hadits Nabi menurut pembela pengingkar dan pemalsunya, Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1995.

Juynboll, G.H.A. Muslim Traditions: Studies in Chronology Provenance and Authorship of Early Ḥadīth, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1985.

----------. “(Re) Appraisal of Some Technical Terms in Ḥadīth” Science. dalam jurnal lslamic Law and Society, vol. 8, (2001).

Katz, Marion H. Islamic History and Civilization: Studies and Texts, Leiden:E. J. Brill, 2002.

al-Khāliq, ‘Abd al-Ghanī ‘Abd. Hujjiyyah al-Sunnah, c. 2, Mansūrah: Dār al-Wafa', 1993.

al-Khatib, Muhammad ‘Ajjāj. Al-Sunnah Qabla al-Tadwin. Makkah: al-Maktabah al-Tijāriyyah, 1980.

Kizil, Fatma. “Fazlur Rahman’s Understanding of the Sunnah/hadīth -A Comparison with Joseph Schacht’s Views on the Subject”, Hadis Tetkikleri Dergisi (HTD), VI/2, 2008.

al-Laṭīf, ‘Abd al-Mawjūd 'Abd. al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah bayn Du’aāt al-Fitnah wa Ad’iyā’ al-‘Ilm, Kairo, Dār al-Ṭibā’ah al-Muhammadiyyah, 1990.

Masrur, Ali. Teori Common Link G.H.A. Juynboll: Melacak Akar Kesejarahan Hadits Nabi Yogyakarta: LKiS Yogyakarta, 2007.

Motzki, Harald. Analysing Muslim Traditions: Studies in Legal, Exegetical and Maghzi Ḥadīth, Laiden: Brill, 2010.

--------. “The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence; “The Muṣannaf of ‘Abd Razzāq al-Ṣan‘āni as a Source of Authentic Aḥādīth of the First Century A.H.,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 50 (1991).

---------. Al-Radd ʿAlā l-Radd: Concerning The Method Of Ḥadīth Analysis, Leiden Boston: BRILL, 2010.

---------. Resume Analysing Muslim Traditions: Studies in Legal, Exegetical and Maghzi Ḥadīth, Laiden: Brill, 2010.

Ozkan, Halit. “The Common Link and Its Relation toThe Madār”, Islamic Law and Society. vol. II. no. I. 2004.

Rāshid, ‘Abd al-‘Aziz b. Radd Shubuhāt al-Ilhād ‘an Aḥadīth al-āḥād wa al-Tawātur ‘inda Ahl al-Kalām, c.2, Bayrūt: al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1981.

Reinhart, A. Kevin. “Juynbolliana, Gradualism, the Big Bang, and Ḥadīth Study in the Twenty First Century”Journal of the American Oriental Society 130.3 (2010) Dartmouth College.

Sanuri, “Muslim’s Responses towards Orientalists’ views on Ḥadīth as the Second Source of Law in Islam with special Reference to Mustafa al-Siba’i’s Criticism Toward Ignaz Goldziher’s Viewpoints.” Al-Qānūn Vol. 12, No. 2, Desember 2009.

Schacht. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.

---------. An Introduction to Islamic Law, Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1982.

Schoeler, Gregor. Character und Authentie der muslimischen berlieferung über das Leben Mohammeds, Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1996.

al-Sibā’ī,Muṣṭafā. al-Sunnah wa makanatuha fi al-Tashri’ al-Islamī, Bairūt: al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 2000.

Ash-Shiddieqy, M. Hasbi. Sejarah Perkembangan Hadits, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1973.

Yaqub, Ali Mustafa. pengantar terjamah Menguji Keaslian hadis-hadis hukum c.2, Jakarta : Pustaka Firdaus, 2013.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v18i1.12678 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


FACULTY OF USHULUDDIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY

Office: Faculty of Ushuluddin Building - 2nd Floor R. Jurnal - Jl. Ir. Juanda No. 95 Ciputat Jakarta

Phone/fax: +62-21-7493677/+62-21-7493579 - email: jurnalrefleksi@apps.uinjkt.ac.id


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View Refleksi's Stats