Pembatalan Kewenangan Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Hal Pemberian Izin Penyadapan, Penggeledahan Dan Penyitaan Pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/ PUU-XVII/2019 Dalam Perspektif Efektifitas Hukum

Sony Aldianto, Burhanudin Burhanudin, Tresia Elda

Abstract


The main problem in this study is that, the position of the Supervisory Board of the Corruption Eradication Commission after the authority in granting wiretapping, search and seizure permits was canceled by the Constitutional Court in the perspective of the effectiveness of the law and the criminal justice system. This study aims to make everyone understand the position and urgency of the KPK Supervisory Board after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 70/PUU-XVII/2019 in the concept of legal effectiveness and the criminal justice system in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that regarding the judge's considerations, that the Supervisory Board of the Corruption Eradication commission in granting wiretapping, search and confiscation permits is a real form of overlapping authority of pro justitia.  The KPK Supervisory Board is not a law enforcement officer, so it is not in accordance with the effectiveness of the law in terms of law enforcement factors, community factors and legal factors, therefore is not included in the components of the criminal justice system and violates the concept of the criminal justice system.

Keywords


Cancellation of Authority; Effectiveness of law; Criminal Justice System

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Alfitra. 2014. Hapusnya Hak Menuntut dan Menjalankan Pidana. Jakarta: RAS.

M Friedmann, Lawrence. 2011. Three Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, Terjemahan M. Khozim. Bandung: Nusamedia.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 2010. Mengenal Hukum. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2013. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2011. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kajian Perbandingan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Soekanto, Soerjono. 2002. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Usman, Sabian. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Sosiologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Yunus, Nur Rohim. 2012. Restorasi Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Indonesia. Jakarta: Jurisprudence Press.

Jurnal

Harsandini, Diska. Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Menjatuhkan Sanksi Dalam Perkara Kekerasan Terhadap Barang (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1217 K/PID/2014), Jurnal Verstek Vol 5, No. 2, 2017.

Rachman, Andi. Legalitas Penyadapan dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Dalam Jurnal Samudera Keadilan, Volume 11, Nomor 2, Juli-Desember 2016.

Rugege, Sam. Judicial Independence in Rwanda. Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, 2007.

Tjoneng, Arman, Christin Septina Basani, Novilta Sidabutar, Menguji Kewenangan Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Pemberian izin Penggeledahan Sebagai Tindak Merintangi Proses Penyidikan, Jurnal Esensi Hukum, vol 2, No. 2, Tahun 2020.

Umar, Olivia. Eksistensi Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasankorupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002. Dinamika, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Volume 26, Nomor 14, Agustus 2020

Putusan

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/PUU-XVII/2019

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 79/PUU-XVII/2019

Website

https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1282972/peneliti-icw-menolak-konsep-dewan-pengawas-kpk diakses pada tanggal 9 september 2021




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i5.23047 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.