KEWENANGAN PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN (Analisis Perbandingan Antara Negara Indonesia Dengan Negara Prancis)

Annisa Hidayatush Sholikha, Ismail Hasani, Fathudin Fathudin

Abstract


This study describes comparison problems of Judicial Reviews in Indonesia and France. Which is where in the comparison, there is an equation and Judicial Review of the Prevailing Laws. This study aims to determine the development of the Judicial Review in Indonesia and French. In particular, this thesis explores a method of Judicial Review between Indonesia and France. The results show that, in Indonesia, there are two institutions that carry out Judicial Review, namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. This is the basis for the comparison of Judicial Review with the French state, which in the French state is only carried out with one institution, namely the Constitutional Council. In general, the practice of Constitutionality contains various aspects such as institutional aspects, procedures and the nature of the decision. In the institutional context, a special institutionalization model is to form an institution such as the Constitutional Court in Indonesia. Then a model of testing by establishing a new body specifically but having a political character and not a judicial body was found in France with the Conseil Constitutionnel. The existence of a Constitutionality Review agency has implications for the procedural aspects and forms of testing it.


Keywords


Judicial Review, Conseil Constitutionel

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2005. Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional Di Berbagai Negara.

Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Dudu Duswara M. 2003. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum; Sebuah Sketsa. Bandung: Refika.

Hasani, Ismail. 2020. Pengujian Konstitusionalitas PERDA. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

I Dewa Gede Atmadja. 2015. Teori Konstitusi dan Konsep Negara Hukum. Malang: Setara Press.

Indrati, Maria Frida. 2007. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan I (Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan).

Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius.

Junaidi, Muhammad. 2018. Hukum Konstitusi “Pandangan dan Gagasan Modernisasi Negara Hukum”. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada: Depok.

Soemantri, Sri. 1997. Hak Uji Material di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.

Sukismo. 2008. Karakter Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Sosiologis.

Yogyakarta: Puskumbangsi Leppa UGM.

Stone, Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press: New York.

Syahrizal, Ahmad. 2006. Peradilan Konstitusi, Suatu Studi tentang Adjudikasi Konstitusional sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Normatif. Jakarta: Prandnya Paramita.

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin. 2018. “Model Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Satu Atap Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum. Vol.25. No.2.

Helmi, Muhammad Ishar. 2019. “Penyelesaian Satu Atap Perkara Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya. Vol. 6, No. 1. Syar-I FSH UIN Jakarta.

Putra, Antoni. 2018. “Dualisme Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan”. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. Vol. 15, No. 2.

Wulandari, Desy. 2018. “ANTE REVIEW dalam Mewujudkan Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia”. Article Indonesian: State Law Review. Vol.1. No.1.

https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id,

http://jimlyschool.com/read/analisis/276/sejarah-constitutional-review-gagasan-pembentukan-mk/

https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/en/general-overview

http://equityjusticia.blogspott.co.id/2015/02/normal-o-false-false-in-x-none-x.html




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i2.21092 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.