FROM LIVING TRADITION TO TRANSMITTED AUTHORITY: AL-SUNNAH BEFORE AND AFTER AL-SHAFIʿĪ

Authors

  • Kholik Ramdan Mahesa UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Rifqi Muhammad Fatkhi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Atiyatul Ulya UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Hilmy Firdausy Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/iu.vi.53653

Keywords:

Hadith Authority, Sunnah, al-Shafi’ī, Hadith Codification.

Abstract

The authority of hadith occupies a central position in Islamic intellectual history, yet its historical formation remains a subject of scholarly debate. Much of the existing literature tends to portray al-Shāfiʿī as the pivotal figure who established the epistemological foundation of hadith as an authoritative source of Islamic law. Such a perspective, however, risks obscuring the long historical process through which mechanisms of transmission, verification, documentation, and legal application of hadith had already developed prior to al-Shāfiʿī. This article addresses that gap by examining the transformation of hadith authority from the generation of the Companions to the emergence of al-Shāfiʿī’s legal theory. Employing an intellectual-historical approach, the study reconstructs the continuity and transformation of hadith authority through an analysis of early transmission practices, the development of scholarly networks among the tābiʿūn, the codification movement of the second century Hijrī, and the epistemological reformulation advanced by al-Shāfiʿī. The study argues that the authority of hadith was neither suddenly created nor exclusively dependent upon al-Shāfiʿī’s intervention. Rather, it emerged through a cumulative process involving verification practices (al-tathabbut), transmission networks, scholarly learning circles, and systematic documentation that had evolved since the earliest Muslim generations. Nevertheless, before al-Shāfiʿī, hadith functioned alongside other normative authorities, including communal practice, companion precedents, and juristic reasoning. The article demonstrates that al-Shāfiʿī’s principal contribution was not the creation of hadith authority, but the systematization and canonization of a new epistemological framework that identified authentic prophetic reports as the primary representation of the Sunnah and the principal criterion of legal legitimacy. Consequently, the transformation associated with al-Shāfiʿī is best understood as a shift from a model of living sunnah grounded in communal practice toward a model of transmitted sunnah grounded in authenticated transmission.

References

Abd-Allah, Umar F. Malik's Concept of 'Amal in the Light of Maliki Legal Theory. PhD Dissertation. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1978.

Alamsyah. Otoritas Sunnah Nabi di Era 4.0: Refleksi Pemikiran Syahrur dan al-Qardawi. Bandar Lampung: Pusaka Media, 2020.

Anas, Mālik ibn. al-Muwaṭṭaʾ. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1997.

Azami, Muhammad Mustafa. Studies in Early Hadith Literature. Indianapolis: American Trust Publications, 1978.

Brown, Daniel W. Menyoal Relevansi Sunnah dalam Islam Modern. Diterjemahkan oleh Jaziar Radianti dan Entin Sariani Muslim. Bandung: Mizan, 2000.

Brown, Jonathan A. C. Hadith: Muhammad's Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2009.

Coulson, Noel J. Hukum Islam dalam Perspektif Sejarah. Diterjemahkan oleh Hamid Ahmad. Jakarta: P3M, 1987.

El Shamsy, Ahmed. The Canonization of Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Fatkhi, Rifqi Muhammad. Kontestasi Nalar dalam Periwayatan dan Kodifikasi Hadis. Tangerang Selatan: HIPIUS Press, 2020.

Ḥanbal, Aḥmad ibn. Musnad Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. Beirut: ʿĀlim al-Kutub, 1998.

Hasan, Ahmad. The Early Development of Islamic Jurisprudence. Diterjemahkan oleh Agah Garnadi. Cet. 1. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka, 1984.

Hallaq, Wael B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Hallaq, Wael B. “Was al-Shafi‘i the Master Architect of Islamic Jurisprudence?” International Journal of Middle East Studies 25, no. 4 (1993): 587-605.

al-Khaṭīb, Muḥammad ʿAjāj. al-Sunnah Qabla al-Tadwīn. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1987.

Lowry, Joseph E. Early Islamic Legal Theory: The Risāla of Muḥammad ibn Idrīs al-Shāfiʿī. Leiden: Brill, 2007.

Melchert, Christopher. The Formation of the Sunni Schools of Law, 9th-10th Centuries C.E. Leiden: Brill, 1997.

al-Mizzī. Tahdhīb al-Kamāl fī Asmāʾ al-Rijāl. Juz 20. Beirut: Muʾassasah al-Risālah, 1403 H.

Motzki, Harald. The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence: Meccan Fiqh Before the Classical Schools. Leiden: Brill, 2002.

Motzki, Harald. “The Musannaf of ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Ṣanʿānī as a Source of Authentic Aḥādīth of the First Century A.H.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 50, no. 1 (1991): 1-21.

Muʿawanah, Arofatul. “Perkembangan Hadis pada Masa Sahabat (Taqlīl wa Tathabbut min al-Riwāyah).” Jurnal Kaca Jurusan Ushuluddin STAI Al-Fithrah 9, no. 2 (2019).

Schacht, Joseph. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950.

al-Syāfiʿī, Muḥammad ibn Idrīs. al-Risālah. t.tp.: Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1938.

Shiddieqy, Hasbi Ash. Sejarah dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadis. Cet. 3. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1965.

Umar. “Konsep Sunnah Perspektif al-Syafi’i.” Al-Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis 2, no. 2 (2018).

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

FROM LIVING TRADITION TO TRANSMITTED AUTHORITY: AL-SUNNAH BEFORE AND AFTER AL-SHAFIʿĪ. (2026). ILMU USHULUDDIN. https://doi.org/10.15408/iu.vi.53653