ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN LITERASI DAN NUMERASI DITINJAU DARI SOAL AKM BERORIENTASI KONTEKS SAINTIFIK DAN SOSIAL BUDAYA PADA MATERI KESETIMBANGAN ASAM DAN BASA

Sri Haryani, Dian Pratiwi, Sri Wardani

Abstract


Currently, the MCA (Minimum Competency Assessment) program is part of the National Assessment to measure minimum literacy and numeracy competencies. MCA questions consist of various content, various contexts and several levels of cognitive levels. This quantitative descriptive research is focused on analyzing the literacy and numeracy abilities of students in solving MCA questions that are integrated with scientific and socio-cultural contexts. Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire and MCA test instruments. The results of this study indicate that the minimum competence of students is mostly at the proficient level of 42%. The greatest achievement of the cognitive level of reading literacy is at the level of evaluating and reflecting because the discourse and phenomena presented in the questions are often encountered by students. The lowest achievement is at the understanding level because it requires the ability to analyze and associate information with the concepts that students have. The achievement of the highest cognitive level of numeracy literacy is at the knowing level because students can carry out basic calculation operations and change variables according to the information in the items. The lowest achievement at the reasoning level was because students had never found the type of questions that required the ability to analyze, predict, and take strategies to solve the items.

.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustina, T. W., Rustaman, N. Y., Riandi, R., & Purwianingsih, W. (2020). Pendekatan STREAM (Science-Technology-Religion-Enginering-Arts-Mathematics) Membekalkan Kebiasaan Berpikir Mahasiswa. EDUSAINS, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i2.17605

Aisah, H., Zaqiah, Q. Y., & Supiana, A. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Asesmen Kemampuan Minimum (AKM): Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan AKM. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Al-Affan, 1(2), 128–135. http://ejournal.stit-alquraniyah.ac.id/index.php/jpia/

Asrijanty. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/19690/1/file_akm2.pdf

Capkinoglu, E., Yilmaz, S., & Leblebicioglu, G. (2020). Quality of argumentation by seventh-graders in local socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 827–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21609

Castells, N., Minguela, M., Solé, I., Miras, M., Nadal, E., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2022). Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(3), 879–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.451

Cerdán, R., Gilabert, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2011). Selecting information to answer questions: Strategic individual differences when searching texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.007

Deviana, T., & Aini, D. F. N. (2022). Learning Progression Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Pengembangan Konten Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM). Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.2095

Dewi, N., & Riandi, R. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kompleks Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Mind Mapping. EDUSAINS, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1805

Durrotunnisa, & Nur, H. R. (2020). Jurnal basicedu. Jurnal Basicedu,. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3(2), 524–532. https://journal.uii.ac.id/ajie/article/view/971

Eryansyah, Erlina, Fiftinova, & Nurweni, A. (2019). EFL Students’ Needs of Digital Literacy to Meet the Demands of 21stCentury Skills. Online-Journal.Unja.Ac.Id, 3(2), 2580–5711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v3i2.8297

Fatimah, F., & Ulfa, N. M. (2022). Uji Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi Pada Materi Fisika Dasar Dengan Soal Kontekstual Dan Nonkontekstual. EDUSAINTEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Dan Teknologi, 9(3), 582–592. https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v9i3.545

Fenanlampir, A., Batlolona, J. R., & Imelda, I. (2019). The struggle of Indonesian Students in the Context of TIMSS and PISA has not Ended. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(2), 393–406.

Grotlüschen, A., Desjardins, R., & Liu, H. (2020). Literacy and numeracy: Global and comparative perspectives. International Review of Education, 66(2–3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09854-x

Handayani, R., & Wulandari, D. (2021). Modern Assessment dalam Menyongsong Pembelajaran Abad 21 dan Hambatan di Negara Berkembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v8i1.1363

Haryani, S., Listanti, D., & Cahyono, E. (2017). Minimalisasi Miskonsepsi Konsep pH Pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam Dan Larutan Penyangga Dengan Eksperimen Berbasis Masalah. Prosding Seminar Nasional & Internasional, 1(2), 292–298. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/psn12012010/article/download/3023/2938

Haryati, M. (2020). Analisis soal UN biologi SMA/MA berdasar dimensi proses kognitif, karakteristik HOTS, dan bentuk stimulus. Jurnal Education and Development, 8(2), 91–94. http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/1634/809

Juanti, S., Karolina, R., & Zanthy, L. S. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Pokok Bahasan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Inovatif, 4(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i2.239-248

K Murugiah, T. (2020). Challenges in Transforming Assessments for 21st Century Skills Development: Lecturers’ Perspective. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 6(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2020.61.41.46

Kamid, K., Saputri, R., & Hariyadi, B. (2021). Pengembangan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills Berbasis Budaya Jambi. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1793–1806. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.678

Khairul Fajri, N. M. A., & Yusmaita, E. (2021). Analisis Literasi Kimia Peserta Didik di SMAN 1 Batam pada Topik Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia dengan Model Rasch. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 5(1), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol5-iss1/576

Maharni, R., Milama, B., & Sholihat, R. N. (2021). Development of SETS-Based Chemistry Learning E-Modules (Science, Environment, Technology, Society) on Colligative Properties of Solutions. EDUSAINS, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v13i2.21753

Masykuri, E. S., Nugraeni, I. I., Basuki, B., & Prihatin, Y. (2022). Penggunaan Strategi Petunjuk Kontekstual Sebagai Strategi Dalam Memahami Teks. Jurnal Bahtera: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 9(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.37729/btr.v9i1.7714

Panggabean, F. T. M., Purba, J., Sutiani, A., & Panggabean, M. A. (2022). Analisis Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Matematika dan Analisis Kimia Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Kimia, 4(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.24114/jipk.v4i1.32904

Priliyanti, A., Muderawan, I. W., & Maryam, S. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Dalam Mempelajari Kimia Kelas Xi. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Undiksha, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpk.v5i1.32402

Sani, R. A. (2021). Pembelajaran Berorientasi AKM: Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. Bumi Aksara.

Sanjiwani, N. L. I., Muderawan, I. W., & Sudiana, I. K. (2020). Analysis of Student Chemistry Learning Difficulties on Buffer Solution at SMA Negeri 2 Banjar Buleleng Bali. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1503(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012038

Sari, R. M., & Wiyarsi, A. (2021). Inquiry Learning Using Local Socio-Scientific Issues as Context to Improve Students’ Chemical Literacy. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020), 528(Icriems 2020), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210305.031

Sudirman, S. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa SMP Pesisir Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender pada SMP Negeri 2 Tiworo Selatan. Applied Quantitative Research.

Vachliotis, T., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2021). Developing Basic Systems Thinking Skills for Deeper Understanding of Chemistry Concepts in High School Students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(May), 100881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100881

Wahyuni, T. (2021). Asesmen Nasional 2021. Guepedia.

Wibowo, T., & Ariyatun, A. (2020). Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pada Siswa Sma Menggunakan Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Etnosains. Edusains, 12(2), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i2.16382

Wulandari, N., & Wulandari, N. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pada Aspek Pengetahuan Dan Kompetensi Sains Siswa Smp Pada Materi Kalor. Edusains, 8(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1762

Zowada, C., Frerichs, N., Zuin, V. G., & Eilks, I. (2020). Developing a lesson plan on conventional and green pesticides in chemistry education-a project of participatory action research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00128j




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v15i2.34086 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 EDUSAINS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

EDUSAINS.  P-ISSN:1979-7281
;E-ISSN:2443-1281

 Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounterView My Stats

 

Â