IDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI DAN KONFLIK KOGNITIF FISIKA: KASUS TERKAIT PERUBAHAN KONSEPTUAL
Abstract
IDENTIFICATION OF MISCONCEPTION AND COGNITIVE CONFLICT OF PHYSICS: A CASE RELATED TO CONCEPTUAL CHANGE
Abstract
Misconceptions still often occur when learning physics. This study aims to identify students' misconceptions and their relationship with cognitive conflict in terms of conceptual change. This research used mixed methods explanatory design methods. The subjects in this study were three students from SahabatQu High School, Yogyakarta. The students studied were categorized into three, namely low, medium, and high ability students. Information related to student abilities is obtained from physics teachers and student learning test results. A conceptual change interview guide, conceptual change observation sheet, cognitive conflict questionnaire, and parabolic motion material misconceptions tests were used as supporting instruments to obtain the desired results in research. The learning process uses a PhET simulation. The results showed that high, medium and low ability students still had misconceptions when learning parabolic motion material. Cognitive conflict in high, medium and low ability students is included in the low and moderate categories with a percentage of 8.33% - 41.67%. All students have not been able to experience the four thought processes so that there are still misconceptions on some topics such as the highest point and the farthest distance based on the projectile motion's elevation angle.
Abstrak
Miskonsepsi masih sering terjadi pada saat pembelajaran fisika. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa dan hubungannya dengan konflik kognitif ditinjau dari perubahan konseptual. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode mixed methods explanatory design. Subjek pada penelitian ini adalah 3 siswa yang berasal dari SMA Sahabatqu, Yogyakarta. Siswa yang diteliti dikategorikan menjadi 3 yaitu siswa berkemampuan rendah, sedang, dan tinggi. Informasi terkait kemampuan siswa diperoleh dari guru fisika dan hasil tes belajar siswa. Pedoman wawancara perubahan konseptual, lembar observasi perubahan konseptual, angket konflik kognitif, dan tes miskonsepsi materi gerak parabola dijadikan instrumen pendukung untuk mendapatkan hasil yang diinginkan dalam penelitian. Proses pembelajaran menggunakan simulasi PhET. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa berkemampuan tinggi, sedang, dan rendah masih memiliki miskonsepsi pada saat pembelajaran materi gerak parabola. Konflik kognitif pada siswa berkemampuan sedang dan rendah termasuk dalam kategori rendah dan siswa berkemampuan tinggi termasuk dalam kategori sedang. Seluruh siswa belum mampu mengalami empat proses berpikir sehingga masih menyisakan miskonsepsi pada beberapa submateri seperti titik tertinggi dan jarak terjauh berdasarkan sudut elevasi gerak parabola.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akmam, A., Anshari, R., Amir, H., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2018). Influence Of Learning Strategy Of Cognitive Conflict On Student Misconception In Computational Physics Course. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science And Engineering, 335(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012074
A’yun, Q., Harjito, & Nuswowati, M. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostic Multiple Choice Berbantuan Cri (Certainty Of Response Index). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1), 2108–2117.
Baser, M. (2006). Fostering conceptual change by cognitive conflict based instruction on students’ understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 96-114.
Bilal, E. & Erol, M. (2012). Effect Of Teaching Via Modeling On Achievement And Conceptual Understanding Concerning Electricity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(3).
Chen, Y. T., & Wang, J. H. (2016). Analyzing With Posner’s Conceptual Change Model And Toulmin’s Model Of Argumentative Demonstration In Senior High School Students’ Mathematic Learning. International Journal Of Information And Education Technology, 6(6), 457–464. Https://Doi.Org/10.7763/Ijiet.2016.V6.732
Hidayatullah, Z., Makhrus, M., & Gunada, I.W. (2018a). Analisis Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Gelombang Mekanik Melalui Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 4(2).
Hidayatullah, Z., Makhrus, M., & Gunada, I.W. (2018b). Identifikasi Tingkat Konflik Kognitif Materi Gelombang Mekanik Melalui Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Konstan, 4(1), 9-16.
Jiang, T., Wang, S., Wang, J., & Ma, Y. (2018). Effect of Different Instructional Methods on Students’ Conceptual Change Regarding Electrical Resistance as Viewed from a Synthesized Theoretical Framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7).
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Gottdenker, J. (2005). Model building for conceptional change. Interactive Learning Environments, 13 (1–2), 15-37.
Kang, H., Scharmann, L.C., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive Conflict And Situational Interest As Factors Influencing Conceptual Change. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(4).
Korganci, N., Miron, C., Dafinei, A., & Antohe, S. (2015). The Importance of Inquiry-Based Learning on Electric Circuit Models for Conceptual Understanding. Procedia-Social And Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2463-2468.
Kural, M., & Kocakülah, M. S. (2016). Teaching For Hot Conceptual Change: Towards A New Model, Beyond The Cold And Warm OneS. European Journal of Education Studies, 2(8), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.163535
Madu, B. C., dan Orji, E. (2011). Effect of Cognitive Conflict Instructional Strategy on Students’ Conceptual Change inn Temperature and Heat. SAGE Open: 1-9.
Makhrus M., Nur M., & Widodo W. (2014). Model Perubahan Konseptual dengan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal PIJAR MIPA, 9(1), 20-25.
Makhrus M., Nur M., & Widodo W. (2018). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Ccm-Cca Untuk Memfasilitasi Perubahan Konsep Gaya Pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 4(2), 253-261.
Nadelson, L. S., Heddy, B. C., Jones, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Johnson, M. (2018). Conceptual Change In Science Teaching And Learning: Introducing The Dynamic Model Of Conceptual Change. International Journal Of Educational Psychology, 7(2), 151–195. Https://Doi.Org/10.17583/Ijep.2018.3349
Purwaningsih, & Budhi, W. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Fisika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika-Compton, 3(1), 54–62.
Rahim, R.A., Noor, N.M., & Zaid, N.M. (2015). Meta-analysis on Element of Cognitive Conflict Strategies with a Focus on Multimedia Learning Material Development. International Education Studies, 8(13).
Sagala, S. (2009). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran untuk Membantu Memecahkan Problematika Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sari, W.P., Suyanto, E., & Suana, W. (2017). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Vektor Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 06 (2)
Setyowati, A., Subali, B., & Mosik. (2011). Implementasi Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Smp Kelas Viii. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 7(2), 89–96. Https://Doi.Org/10.15294/Jpfi.V7i2.1078
Sukariasih, L. (2016). The Use Of Cognitive Conflict Strategy To Reduce Student Misconceptions On The Subject Matter Of Rectilinear. International Journal Of Education And Research, 4(7), 483–492.
Zohar, A., & Aharon-Kravetsky, S. (2005). Exploring the effects of cognitive conflict and direct teaching for students of different academic levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 829-855
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i1.13504 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Zul Hidayatullah, Jumadi Jumadi, Nuraini Nadhiroh, Endah Kartika, Azizah Ainun Nuha, Sony Yunior Erlangga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
EDUSAINS. P-ISSN:1979-7281;E-ISSN:2443-1281
Â
Â