Field Studies of Ecology Impacts: The role and Its Contribution to Quality of Education Model Developed Based on Research Paradigm

Kristiyanto Kristiyanto

Abstract


STUDI LAPANGAN DAMPAK EKOLOGI: PERAN DAN KONTRIBUSINYA TERHADAP PENGEMBANGAN KUALITAS MODEL PENDIDIKAN BERDASARKAN PARADIGMA PENELITIAN

 

Abstrak

Mengembangkan model pendidikan yang baik dan dinamis dalam prosesnya, seharusnya dapat meningkatkan kualitas induvidu maupun kelompok mahasiswa atau peserta didik di perguruan tinggi (PT), agar dapat menyesuaikan diri terhadap dinamika perubahan zaman, sehingga studi lapang salah satu langkah yang perlu mendapat perhatian, dimana secara tidak langsung kegiatan ini mampu meningkatkan kualitas (SDM) dalam rangka menghadapi permasalahan dimasa mendatang yang semakin kompleks, disamping sebagai modal utama dalam mempersiapkan SDM yang berkualitas, baik sebagai pendidik (guru) maupun seorang peneliti yang professional dan kompeten dalam bidangnya. Tujuan dari kegiatan studi lapang tersebut, masih dihadapkan dengan minimnya SDM, sehingga tidak mudah untuk mengimplementasikannya secara dinamis dan berkelanjutan, sehingga tujuan dari penelitian ini, akan mengeksplore atau mengkaji lebih detail tentang peran dan kontribusi studi lapang di kalangan PT, yang tentunya membutuhkan proses pembelajaran yang lebih baik, dalam membentuk kualitas SDM yang berkualitas. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini, lebih melihat pada dinamika persepsi dan interpretasi mahasiswa, yang berkaitan dengan pengalamannya selama di lapang, dan sejauh mana keberhasilan yang diperoleh atau dicapainya, setelah melakukan studi lapang yang berupa produk ilmiah, seperti naskah ilmiah, baik berupa bentuk laporan penelitian maupun jurnal, kemudian proses diskusi panel di dalam kelas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode studi lapang salah satu kegiatan yang tidak mudah dilakukan, ketika menyusun sebuah laporan yang ilmiah, hal ini dapat dilihat dari aspek lemahnya argumentasi ilmiah yang dibangun, sehingga permasalahan ini, menjadi memberi gambarkan kepada semua pihak, bahwa model pendidikan ini perlu di ubah, dengan memodifikasi sebuah kurikulum yang lebih dinamis, dan tentunya juga disesuaikan dengan perkembangan zaman.

Abstract

Developing quality of education model in learning process was ought to increase skills of both individual and group of students in order to pave their readiness for today’s competitive era. Field study is an approach in learning that may develop to increase the quality of student, particularly in confronting with real life problems. This research was aimed to study the role and contribution of the field study to increase the quality of students. Using students’ perception and interpretations on the study field learning approach, this study tried to answers queries on the extent of study field approach for their learning success. Results revealed that the current field study approach was one of difficult approaches to be implemented in learning. During report development, for example, it was found that there are writing skills that need to be developed. It is suggested from this study, therefore, that field study approach needs to be more dynamic and its curriculum needs to be adjusted with the current development.


Keywords


aporan penelitian; pergurun tinggi; field studies; human quality; higher education; science of paper; written up; penulisan ilmiah, studi lapang; sumber daya manusia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Makhamreh, S, Alnabulsi, H, Asfour, H. 2016. Social Work Field Training for the Community: A Student Self-Directed Approach in the Environmental Domain in Jordan. British Journal of Social Work, (46), 855-872.

Bernstein, S. E., Turban, S. 2018. The impact of the ‘open’ workspace on human collaboration. Philosophical Transactions R. Soc. (10), 1-8.

Daniels, D. Lori, L. S. 2014. Better safe than sorry: Planning for safe and successful fieldwork. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 95 (3), 264-273. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1890/0012-9623-95.3.264.

Fleischner, L. Thomas et al. 2017. Teaching biology in the field: Importance, challenges, and solution. BioScience, 67 (6), 558-567.

Gnip, P., Kafka, S. 2003. Using technology of data collection and data processing in precision farming. Agric. Econ, 49 (9), 419-426. https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/59465.pdf.

Holmes, G, N., Wieman, E, C,, Bonn, A, D. 2015. Teaching critical thinking. PNAS, 112 (36), 11199-11204.

Kari Beate R., Froyland M. 2015. Supporting student learning processes during preparation, fieldwork and follow-up work: Examples from upper secondary school in Norway. NorDina, 11 (1), 118-134.

Keric, E., et al. 2017. The effect of active teaching in the primary school’s ecological content. Educatio Biologiae, [Extended summary], 15-20.

Kristiyanto. 2018a. Membangun dan mengembangkan nuansa pendidikan berbasis educative dan research: Kelemahan dan peluang kini dan kedepan. Di sampaikan dalam kegiatan “Diskusi Panel Pusat Kajian Pendidikan Biologi”, di Sasana Krida Kampus A Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Jakarta 18 September 2018.

Kristiyanto. 2019b. Saving Traditional Water Harvesting Systems and Its Dynamic Employing of Types To Welfare of Local People in Sodonghilir Areas Tasikmalaya Regency West Java. Field report [unpublished].

Marlina, L., Liliasari, Tjasyono, B., Hendayana, S. 2018. Improving the critical skill of junior high scholl students on earth and space science (ESS) materials. 4th International Seminar of Mathematics, Science and Computer Science Education, IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series (1013) 012063.

Quitadamo, J., Ian, Kurtz, J., Martha. 2007. Learning to Improve: Using Writing to Increase Critical Thinking Performance in General Education Biology. CBE-Life Science Education, (6), 140-154. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1885902/pdf/cbe140.pdf.

Restif, O., et al. 2012. Model-guided fieldwork: practical guidelines for multidisciplinary research on wildlife ecological and epidemiological dynamics. Ecology Letter, (15), 1083-1094. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3466409/pdf/ele0015-1083.pdf.

Sanli, Oner, Erdem, S., Tefik, T. 2013. How to write a discussion section?. Turkish Journal of Urology, 39 (1), 20-24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548568/pdf/tju-39-supp-20.pdf.

Stephanie, E. et al. 2017. Skill and knowledge for data intensive environmental research. BioScience, 67 (6), 546-557.

Suresh, Karthik, Thomas, V. S, Suresh, G. 2011. Design, data analysis and sampling techniques for clinical research. Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 14 (4), 287-290. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271469/.

Tiwary, K., Nawin, Moirangthem, D., Kaur, G. 2017. Importance of Field Studies in Environmental Education: An Experience from Keoladeo National Park, Rajasthan. J. Innov. Inclusive Dev, 2 (1), 54-55.

Whitehead, N. A., 2018. Tujuan pendidikan: Esensi dan aspek-aspek filosofis. Penerbit Nuansa Cendikia: Bandung.

Zdravka, K., Atasoy E. 2008. Methods of successful learning in environmental education. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 4 (1), 49-78.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i1.11566 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

EDUSAINS.  P-ISSN:1979-7281
;E-ISSN:2443-1281

 Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounterView My Stats