The Suitability of Visual Images in Baina Yadaik Arabic Textbook

Alya Rahma Widyanti; Abdul Muta'ali

doi:10.15408/a.v9i2.28987

The Suitability of Visual Images in Baina Yadaik Arabic Textbook

Alya Rahma Widyanti, Abdul Muta'ali

Abstract

This study was brought up due to 308 mismatches of images with the written vocabulary in the Baina Yadaik Arabic textbook. This research focused on the compatibility of visual images with written vocabulary. The object used was 1386 images in 8 chapters of the Baina Yadaik Arabic textbook volume 1A. Baina Yadaik Arabic book is an Arabic learning book used to help learners learn everyday vocabulary for beginners. This research used the visual representational mode theory by Kress and Van Leeuwen. The methodology of this study was a descriptive qualitative with multimodal discourse analysis. The VGG Image Annotator corpus tools assisted this research to analyze images with written vocabulary. This study concluded that visual images are one of the essential components of learning Arabic. Many images in Baina Yadaik Arabic textbook volume 1A do not match the written vocabulary. This book still adheres to Arabic culture, which is very different from the culture in Indonesia, and needs special attention for teacher to use this book as a learning tool.

Keywords

visual image in textbook; vocabulary; al-'Arabiyah baina yadaik; representational

Full Text:

PDF

References

Clark, Ruth., & Lyons, Chopeta. (2011). Graphics for learning. San Francisco: Wiley.

Cook, Michelle. (2008). Students’ comprehension of science concepts depicted in textbook illustrations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(1).

Creswell, John. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: CA Sage.

Delani, Anastasia., Antartika, I Kadek., & Mardani, Desak. (2017). Pengembangan Media Kartu Asosiasi Gambar "Katakana-Ina" Untuk Pembelajaran Katakana Bagi Pemula Di Sma Negeri 4 Singaraja. JPBJ, 3(3).

Eilam, Billie. (2012). Teaching, learning, and visual literacy: The dual role of visual representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fang, Zhihui. (1996). Illustrations, text, and the child reader: what are pictures in children's storybooks for? Reading Horizons, 37(2).

Fujioka, Yuki. (1999). Television Portrayals and African-American Stereotypes: Examination of Television Effects when Direct Contact is Lacking. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1).

Ghofur, Abdul. (2019). Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab (Studi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab dengan Menggunakan Buku Alarabiyah Baina Yadaika di Ma’had Abu Bakar Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta). Didaktika, 20(1).

Hidayat, Khoirful., & Habibi, Fajri. (2018). The Effect Of Flash Card And Picture Story In Vocabulary To The Seventh Grader. Getsempena English Education Journal (GEEJ), 5(1).

Homer, Bruce. Plass, Jan. (2010). Expertise reversal for iconic representations in science visualizations. Instructional Science, 38(3).

Inayah, Rohmaniyah. (2013). Gender, Androsentrisme dan Sexisme dalam Tafsir Agama. Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 2(1).

Jatmiko., & Jauhari, Tontowi. (2018). The Effectiveness of Using Picture to Teach Vocabulary at Elementary School. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities.

Kantartzi. (2003). Stereotypes of gender roles in textbooks of primary school. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis.

Kasmaienezhadfard, Sara., Pourrajab, Masoumeh., & Rabbani, Mohtaram. (2015). Effects of Pictures In Textbooks On Students’ Creativity. Multi Disciplinary Edu Global Quest, 4(12).

Kress, Gunther., & van Leeuwen, Theo. (2021). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.

Lowe, Ric. (2007). Educational illustrations. Western Australia: Savant Publications.

Mendoza, Jean., & Reese, Debbie. (2001). Examining multicultural picture books for the early childhood classroom: possibilities and pitfalls. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 3(2).

Novick, Laura. (2006). The importance of both diagrammatic conventions and domain-specific knowledge for diagram literacy in science: The hierarchy as an illustrative case. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Pahlefi, M.Riza. (2020). Analisis Buku Al-’Arabiyyah Baina Yadaik Jilid I. Al-Ittijah, 12(2).

Pertama, Tia,. Rukmini, Dwi., & Bharati, Dwi. (2018). Implementation of Three Metafunctions in Verbal Language and Visual Image of Students’ Textbook. English Education Journal, 8(4).

Pujiasih, Erna. (2021). Peningkatan Kemampuan Membaca Teks Recount dengan Model Pembelajaran Jigsaw melalui Gambar “Sungai Kehidupan”. Ideguru, 6(2).

Postigo, Yolanda., & López-Manjón, Asunción. (2019). Images in biology: are instructional criteria used in textbook image design? International Journal of Science Education, 41(2).

Ratnasari, Eka. (2020). The Influence of Picture Book to the Storytelling skill of Preschool Children. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies, 9(1).

Salbego, Nayara., Heberle, Viviane., & Silva Balen, Maria. (2015). A visual analysis of English textbooks: Multimodal scaffolded learning. Calidoscópio, 13(1).

Sugianto, Ahmad., & Prastika, Marisa.Azka. (2021). Are They Merely Pictures?’: Delineating The Images Represented in Acrostic Poems of a Primary School Level EFL Textbook. International Journal of Education & Curriculum Application, 4(3).

Tan, Y. (2012). A multimodal discourse analysis of the senior high school English textbooks Advance with English. MA Thesis, Hunan University of Science and Technology.

Tarrayo, Veronico. (2014). Gendered Word (Or World): Sexism in Philippine Preschool English Language Textbooks. Journal on English Language Teaching, 4(1).

Torres, Gabriella. (2015). Reading’ World Link: A visual social semiotic analysis of an EFL textbook. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1).

Unsworth, Len., & Wheeler, Jen. (2002). Revaluing the Role of Images in Reviewing Picture Books. Reading, 36(2).

Walsh, Maureen. (2006). Reading visual and multimodal texts: how is ‘reading’ different? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29(1).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v9i2.28987 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0