A Qualitative Inquiry of Politeness Approaches through Gender Category: Evidences from University Students in Aceh
Abstract
Purpose
This study examines the politeness strategies employed by male and female students and its differences across genders.
Method
To collect data for this qualitative study, 16 participants (with equally eight male and female students) were purposefully opted from the Department of English Language Education at UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. Eleven situations created to obtain responses from students using a semi-structured interview. The framework of analysis is based on Brown and Levinson’s politeness strategy.
Results/Findings
The study found that male and female students use four politeness strategies. They are (a) bald on record; (b) positive politeness; (c) negative politeness; and (d) off-record. The results indicated that positive politeness is the most prevalent strategy, while bald on record is the least utilized strategy. The politeness strategy was utilized when the participants wanted to express their view to classmates or lecturers. The students performed the strategy because they wanted to support their beliefs or statements unswervingly. Male students used more positive politeness and expresses ideas more directly than female students.
Conclusion
The study concluded that both male and female students at the Department of English Language Education, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh exercised all varieties of politeness strategies. The most applied approaches were positive politeness strategy, followed by the negative politeness strategy, off-record and eventually bald on record as the least frequent politeness strategy.
Keywords
References
Abbas, F., Anjum, K., & Pasha, S. B. (2019). Speech act of apology by Pakistani English speakers through the theory of politeness. The Dialogue, 14(2), 196–213.
Adel, S. M. R., Davoudi, M., & Ramezanzadeh, A. (2016). A qualitative study of politeness strategies used by Iranian EFL learners in a class blog. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 47–62.
Akmal, S. (2017). The language of political campaign in post-civil war muslim society. Aricis Proceedings, 1(8), 683–690.
Alakrash, H. M., & Bustan, E. S. (2020). Politeness strategies employed by Arab EFL and Malaysian ESL students in making request. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(6), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i6/7257
Aliakbari, M., & Moalemi, R. (2015). Variation of ooliteness strategies among the Iranian students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(5), 981–988. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0505.13
Arif, N., Iskandar, I., Muliati, A., & Patak, A. A. (2018). Male and female lecturers’ politeness strategies in EFL classroom. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 1(2), 88–98.
Baron, D. (1986). Grammar and gender. Yale University Press.
Brown, P. (2015). Politeness and Language. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 326–330). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53072-4
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, G. M. (2015). Losing face on social media. Communication Research, 42(6), 819–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510937
Coates, J. (2016). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Culpeper, J., & Terkourafi, M. (2017). Pragmatics and (im)politeness. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Kadar (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of (Im)politeness (pp. 11–39). Palgrave.
Eshghinejad, S., & Moini, M. R. (2016). Politeness strategies used in text messaging. SAGE Open, 6(1), 215824401663228. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016632288
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJTAS.20160501.11
Fernández-Amaya, L. (2019). Disagreement and (im)politeness in a Spanish family members’ WhatsApp group. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(4), 1065–1087. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2019-23-4-1065-1087
Fetzer, A., & Oishi, A. (2011). Introduction. In A. Fetzer & E. Oishi (Eds.), Context and contexts. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Fuchs, R. (2017). Do women (still) use more intensifiers than men? International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.03fuc
Goodwin, J. (2014). Conceptions of speech acts in the theory and practice of argumentation: A case study of a debate about advocating. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0003
Halim, H., Kaseng, S., Taha, Z., & Hamsa, A. (2015). Politeness in Buginese language as a social status symbol in Wajo regency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(1), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0601.29
Hastings, S. O., & Castle Bell, G. (2018). Facing our heuristic limits: Expanding the terminology for types of positive face. Communication Quarterly, 66(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2017.1340317
Karbelani, A. (2013). Politeness strategies usage in accompanying assertive illocutionary acrs on Barrack Obama’s speech and interview toward the development of Islamic center near ground zero. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1), 50–56.
Khammari, H. (2021). Strategies and mitigation devices in the speech act of disagreement in American English. Studies in Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis, 2(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.48185/spda.v2i1.243
Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language at woman’s place. Cambridge University Press.
Monsefi, M., & Hadidi, Y. (2015). Male and female EFL teachers’ politeness strategies in oral discourse and their effect on the learning process and teacher-student interaction. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 3(1), 1–13.
Nguyen, T. Q. T. (2015). Conducting semi-structured interviews with the Vietnamese. Qualitative Research Journal, 15(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-04-2014-0012
Park, G., Yaden, D. B., Schwartz, H. A., Kern, M. L., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Ungar, L. H., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Women are Warmer But No Less Assertive Than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook. PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0155885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155885
Prayitno, H. J., Ngalim, A., Sutopo, A., Rohmadi, M., & Yuniawan, T. (2018). Power, orientation, and strategy of positive politeness used by children at the age of elementary school with Javanese cultural background. Humanus, 17(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v17i2.101371
Puumala, E., & Shindo, R. (2021). Exploring the links between language, everyday citizenship, and community. Citizenship Studies, 25(6), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2021.1968696
Ramadhani, P. (2014). Politeness strategies and gender differences in Javanese indirect speech acts. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan Pascasarjana Unimed, 15(1), 24–33.
Revita, I., Trioclarise, R., & Anggreiny, N. (2017). Politeness strategies of the panders in womentrafficking. Buletin Al-Turas, 23(1), 191–210.
Ryabova, M. (2015). Politeness strategy in everyday communication. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.033
Bavarsad, S.S, & Simin, S. (2015). A cultural study of social disagreement strategies by Iranian EFL male and female learners. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 48, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.48.78
Salman, H. S., & Betti, M. J. (2020). Politeness and face threatening acts in Iraqi EFL learners’ conversations. GLOSSA, 3(8), 221–233.
Scharp, K. M., & Sanders, M. L. (2019). What is a theme? Teaching thematic analysis in qualitative communication research methods. Communication Teacher, 33(2), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2018.1536794
Seli, S., & Syafitri, D. (2018). Politeness in bad neighbors movie. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 1(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v1i2.187
Trudgill, P. (1997). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. In Sociolinguistics (pp. 179–184). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_15
Wahyuningsih, S. (2018). Men and women differences in using language: A case study of students at STAIN Kudus. Edulite Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 3(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.3.1.79-90
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
DOI: 10.15408/bat.v28i2.26515
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Saiful Akmal, Halimatun Husna, Titin Arifa Maulida, Muhammad Farkhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
