The Negative Impact of Monodisciplinary Tradition in Arabic Language and Literature Studies
Abstract
Purpose
As the title suggests, this paper discussed the monodisciplinary tradition of studying Arabic language and literature which became an obstacle for scientific publications or other dissemination activities.
Method
The qualitative study made a library research design whose primary data sourced from journal articles, books, research proposals/thesis, and online sources. Careful reading and analysis were applied to get the intended data useful in answering the problems being investigated. The collected data and relevant information were qualitatively analyzed using Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics.
Results/Findings
The found out many negative consequences of the using of a monodisciplinary study. In general, the study of Arabic language and literature had lack of research significance, depth of analysis, and criticism. It was neither lack of originality nor creativity. In addition to the mono-disciplinary study tradition factor, the teaching university paradigm and poor learning traditions became another contributing factor.
Conclusion
A mono-disciplinary in studying Arabic language and literature did not contribute significantly to its development. It was necessary to use multidisciplinary intra/interdisciplinary paradigm as a trend in the teaching and studying of Arabic language and literature in the world by which various shortcomings lessened.
Keywords
References
Abdillah, M. (2018). Pedoman Penulisan Tesis dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Sekolah Pascasarjana UIN Jakarta.
Abdullah, Muhammad Hasan. (2001). al-Islamiyyah wa ar-Ruhiyyah Fi Adab Najib Mahfuzh. Kairo: Dar al-Qubba.
Alfadly, H.O.A, & Moawad, A.A.A. (2018). “Transformational - Generative Theory: A Study on Al-Jurjani’s Linguistic Theory”. International Journal of Linguistics & Communication, Vol 6 No 1 June. DOI: 10.15640/ijlc.v6n1a3.
Al-Khathib, H. (1999). Afaq al-Adab al-Muqaran: Arabiyyan wa ‘Alamiyyan, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Anis, F., & Huda, N. (2019). Kefasihan Bahasa Hadis Nabi dalam Perubahan Kata Kerja. Buletin Al-Turas, 25(2), 265-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/ bat.v25i2.12463
Astari, R., Mukhlis, A., Faturrahman, M. I., & Seman, M. B. (2021). The Auliya Meaning and Its Implementation in the Indonesia’s and Malaysia’s Leader Election. Buletin Al-Turas, 27(1), 179-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v27i1.16133
Ayyub, N. (2011). Nash al-Qari al-Mukhtalif wa Simiiyaiyyah al-Khithab an-Naqd. Beiut: Maktabah Lubnan.
Bem, D. J. (2021). Writing the empirical journal article. In The compleat academic (pp. 171-201). Psychology Press.
Brew, A., & Wekke, I. S. (2018). Hakikat Karya Ilmiah (The Nature of Research). Deepublish.
Cristal, D. (2010). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, D. (2020). Range: Mengapa Menguasai Beragam Bidang Bisa Membuat Kita Unggul di Dunia yang Mengedepankan Kekhususan. Terjemahan dari Range: Why Generalists in a Specailized World. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana, Pengantar Analisis Teks Media, Yogyakarta: LkiS.
Esteitieh, S.M.. (2008). al-Lisaniyyat: al-Majal, Wal Wazhifah, Wal Manhaj. Irbid (Yordania): ‘Alam al-Kutb al-Hadits.
Fadhal, S. (1997). Manahij an-Naqd al-Mu’ashir, Kairo: Dar al-Afaq al’Arabiyah.
Faisal, S. (1992). Format-Format Penelitian Sosial, Dasar-Dasar dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Francisco, L. D., & Madrazo, C. A. (2019). Reading habits, reading comprehension and academic performance of grade V pupils. Asian ESP, 15(2), 138-165.
Geertz, C. (2008). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture (pp. 41-51). Routledge.
Goodman, B. E., Barker, M. K., & Cooke, J. E. (2018). Best practices in active and student-centered learning in physiology classes. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(3), 417-423.
Harari, Y. N. (2018). Sapiens Jakarta: Gramedia.
Helmanita, & Kamil, S. (2006). “Format Pendidikan Antikorupsi di UIN.IAIN: Review atas Desain Kurikulum dan Pross Pembelajaran”. Laporan Hasil Penelitian (h.47). Jakarta: CSRC UIN Jakarta dan Partenrship.
Herdiansyah, P. & Basid, A. (2019). Iktisyâf Al-Isti’ârah Fî Yâsîn Fadhîlah Min Dhau Nazhariyyah Abd Al-Qahir Al-Jurjani”. Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, Vol. 6 No. 2 December. 342-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/ a.v6i2.9047.
Himmish, B. (2010). Ibn Khaldun, Sang Maha Guru, Sebuah Novel yang Diangkat dari Perjalanan Hidup Sang Ilmuan Muslim. Terjemahan dari al-‘Allamah. Ciputat: Lentera Hati.
Jabali, F. & Jamhari, (2002). IAIN dan Modernisasi Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Logos.
Kamil, S. (2012). Teori Kritik Sastra Arab Klasik dan Modern. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Kamil, S. (2013). Najib Mahfuzh: Sastra, Islam, dan Politik (Studi Semiotika atas Novel Aulad Haratina). Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.
Karmakar, G. (2021). “Tagore, Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism: Perceptions, Contestations and Contemporary Relevance ed. by Mohammad A. Quayum (review)”. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, Penn State University Press. Volume 23, Number 4. 597-601.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Columbia University Press.
Khafaji, M. A. (1980). al-Buhuts al-Adabiyyah: Manahijuha wa Mashadiruha . Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Lubnani.
Mahayana, M. (2009). Ceramah, disampaikannya dalam suatu acara bedah buku penulis Teori Kritik Sastra Arab di Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora UIN Jakarta.
Murdiono, M, Hasaniyah, N, Taufiq, H.N. (2021). “Makna Lafazh Qaul dan Kalâm di dalam Al-Qur’an Menurut Perspektif Ilmu Balaghah, Arabi : Journal of Arabic Studies, Vol. 6 No. 1 June. 68-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24865/ajas.v6i1.318
Nada, T. (1980). al-Adab al-Muqaran. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif.
Pals, D. L. (1996). Seven Theories of Religion. New York: Oxford University Presss.
Rashwan, H. (2021). Literary Genre as a Theoretical Colonization by Modernism: Arabic Balāghah and its Literariness in Ancient Egyptian Literature”. Interdiscipli-nary Literary Studies, Penn State University Press. Volume 23, Number 1. 24-68.
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge university press.
Rosyada, D. (2019). Mandiri dan Global, Memori Jabatan Rektor Priode 2015-2019. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Suhelmi, A. (1999). Pemikiran Politik Barat. Jakarta: Darul Falah.
Suher, D. (2022). “Call for Papers: "Literature and Media," ACLA (American Comparative Literature Association) Annual Meeting 2022. https://networks.h-net.org/node/22055/discussions/8645697/call-papers-literature-and-media-acla-2022.
Suparlan, S. ( 2004). “Ilmu Pengetahuan, Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Tinggi, dan Etika Akademik”. Makalah Workshop Etika Akademik Global, Jakarta: Depag RI, 11 Oktober.
Suralaga, F. (2019). Pedoman Akademik Strata 1 2016/2017. Jakarta: UIN Jakarta.
Tafsir, A. (2001), Filsafat Umum, Akal dan Hati Sejak Thales sampai Capra. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Tasnimah, T. M. (2019). “Qiṣṣah Qaṣīrah Jiddan: Sebuah Genre Terbaru Dalam Sastra Arab”. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, Vol. III, No. 2, Desember. 165–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2019.03202
Teeuw, A.2003). Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra (h. 121). Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.
Umar, Ahmad Mukhtar. (1982). ‘Ilm ad-Dalalah, Kuwait: Maktabah Dar al-‘Arubah.
Wasito, Hermawan. (1993). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian (h. 7-8). Jakarta: Gramedia.
Yulianeta, & Tam, R. (2021). “Social Satire on Higher Education: A Comparative Structural Semiotic Study of The Movies Alangkah Lucunya (Negeri Ini) and Parasite”. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 11, No. 1, May. 245-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34613 .
DOI: 10.15408/bat.v28i1.23341
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Sukron Kamil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
