Public Trust in the Religious Court to Handle Dispute of Sharia Economy
Abstract
Religious court is not empowered to seek justice in settling sharia economic disputes. Practitioners of sharia economy lack the enthusiasm to demonstrate the importance of a religious court in solving sharia economic disputes. At the same time, Muslims have often utilized a religious court to solve problems in family law such as divorce, inheritance disputes, applications for child custody, probate, and grants. This trend indicates a lack of public trust in the religious court. This study analyzes how public trust is the main obstacle to improving religious court services to resolve sharia economic disputes. The research is based on sharia economic cases that have been decided in the last fifteen years and interviews with some judges, advocates, and practitioners of sharia economy. The research findings showed that there are three key points on which public trust in religious courts remains low: (1) The historical development of religious courts and the incompleteness of laws and regulations to support the judicial process in resolving sharia economic disputes, (2) The business demand to deal with disputes effectively and efficiently as well as the factor of the lack of the supporting facilities and infrastructures; and (3) lack of legal literacy among Islamic economic practitioners to resolve disputes. Public trusts are crucial for Muslims to raise awareness and belief in the religious court. This macroscopic study requires microscopic analysis to see the anatomy of public perception of religious courts in solving sharia economic disputes.
Abstrak
Peradilan Agama kurang dimanfaatkan untuk pencarian keadilan dalam sengketa ekonomi syariah. Mereka hanya memanfaatkan Peradilan Agama untuk memecahkan masalah dalam hukum keluarga seperti perceraian, sengketa kewarisan, permohonan hak asuh anak, wasiat dan hibah. Kecenderungan ini menjadi tanda dari rendahnya kepercayaan publik terhadap Peradilan Agama. Tulisan ini menganalisis bagaimana kepercayaan publik kepada Peradilan Agama menjadi kendala utama dalam pemanfaatan pelayanan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah. Fokus penelitian ini pada data perkara ekonomi syariah yang diputuskan pada lima belas tahun terakhir dan wawancara dengan sejumlah hakim, pengaraca, dan pelaku ekonomi syariah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tiga prasyarat yang menjadi dasar lemahnya kepercayaan publik terhadap Peradilan Agama: (1) sejarah perjalanan Peradilan Agama dan aturan perundang-undangan yang tidak lengkap untuk mendukung proses peradilan penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah; (2) tuntutan budaya bisnis dalam penyelesaian sengketa yang cepat efektif dan efisien serta kurangnya sarana dan prasana pendukungnya serta; (3) literasi hukum yang rendah di kalangan pelaku ekonomi syariah untuk menyelesaikan sengketa syariah di Peradilan Agama. Kepercayaan publik menjadi sangat krusial bagi umat Islam dalam meningkatkan kesadaran dan kepercayaan pada lembaga Peradilan Agama. Tulisan ini bersifat umum sehingga dibutuhkan suatu kajian yang bersifat khusus untuk dapat melihat anatomi persepsi publik terhadap Peradilan Agama dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah.
Keywords
References
Al Hasan, F. A. (2019). Peran Pengadilan Agama dalam Mendukung Perkembangan Industri Keuangan Syariah di Indonesia. Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum. https://doi.org/10.22515/al-ahkam.v4i1.1329
Amiruddin. (2012). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Grafindo Persada.
Apriyandanu, E. (2018). Kedudukan Basyarnas Dalam Penanganan Kepailitan Perbankan Syariah Ditinjau Dari UU No. 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v1i1.2230
Azheri, B. (2018). Urgency of the establishment of a special court for the resolution of Sharia economic dispute in the Religious Courts. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues.
Budiharto, & Sismarwoto, E. (2020). Freedom of contracts and dispute settlement between conventional banking and sharia banking. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/438
Chen, J. V., Jubilado, R. J. M., Capistrano, E. P. S., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing - An application of the IS Success Model and trust theory. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.017
Daulay, H. R. (2021). Legal Reconstruction Settlement Of Sharia Capital Market Strengthening Regulatory Aspects To Provide Legal Certainability Disputes : 40, 161–169.
Faizal, B. T. W. (2021). Menakar Urgensi Pengaturan Pelaksanaan Dan Pembatalan Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (BASYARNAS). Ijlil. https://doi.org/10.35719/ijl.v1i01.73
Fitriyanti, F., Yunita, A., & Hamsin, M. K. (2020). Peningkatan Kualitas Kompetensi Arbiter Syari’ah Di Badan Arbitrase Syari’ah Nasional (BASYARNAS) Wilayah Diy. Panrita Abdi - Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat. https://doi.org/10.20956/pa.v4i3.7437
Foster, C., & Frieden, J. (2017). Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government. European Union Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517723499
Gofar, A. (2017). The reform of the procedural religious court law based on islamic law in indonesian legal system. Sriwijaya Law Review. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol1.Iss2.37.pp114-127
Hardin, R. (2013). Government without trust. Journal of Trust Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2013.771502
Hariyanto, E. (2014). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia. IQTISHADIA: Jurnal Ekonomi & Perbankan Syariah, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.19105/iqtishadia.v1i1.365
Hariyanto, E. (2016a). The Characteristic Settlement of The Syariah Banking Dispute In Religious Judiciary. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945.
Hariyanto, E. (2016b). The Political Scrimmage of The Religious Court’s Law as The Judicial Institution In The Reformation Era in Indonesia. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 11(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-ihkam.v11i1.782
Hong, H. (2013). Government websites and social media’s influence on government-public relationships. Public Relations Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.007
Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage Between Researchers and Practitioners: A Qualitative Study. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027002363
Hudawati, S. N. (2020). Problematika Hukum Formil Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1102
Idri. (2009). RELIGIOUS COURT IN INDONESIA History and Prospect. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 03(02), 297–313.
Im, T., Cho, W., Porumbescu, G., & Park, J. (2014). Internet, Trust in Government, and Citizen Compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus037
Isti’anah, H., & Kusnadi, N. (2019). Existence of Religious Court in Indonesia as the Executor Mortgage Right of Islamic Bank Financing. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding.
Jamal, M., Mahfudz, A. A., Syamsuri, S., & Handayani, R. (2021). Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution in non-litigation dispute resolution on Islamic Mortgage: at the Ombudsman Institution Yogyakarta. TSAQAFAH, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v17i1.6760
Jamaludin, M. J. (2020). Penanganan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Perspektif Cita Hukum di Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Semarang. JURNAL AL-QARDH. https://doi.org/10.23971/jaq.v5i1.1882
Kamal, H. (2020). Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Pasca Putusan MK No. 93/PUU-X/2012. Al Mashaadir : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah. https://doi.org/10.52029/jis.v1i1.4
Karmawan, K. (2020). Mediation in the Religious Courts of Indonesia. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v20i1.13249
Kasim, A. (2021). THE SETTLEMENT OF SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTES IN INDONESIAN ISLAMIC CLASSIC TRADITIONS AND POSITIVE LAW. Tasharruf: Journal Economics and Business of Islam, 6(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.30984/tjebi.v6i1.1414
Khasanah, K., Adinugraha, H. H., & Mayangsari, P. A. (2021). Online Dispute Resolution ( ODR ) as an Alternative Resolution of Sharia Economics in Indonesia. Jhi, 19, 21–42.
Khosravi, M. (2020). Perceived Risk of COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Public Worry and Trust. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 17(4), em203. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/7856
Lathifah, A. (2020). State Marriage and Civil Marriage: The Role of State Policy on Interreligious Marriage in Central Java. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, 15(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.19105/AL-IHKAM.V15I1.2689
Marzuki, M., Yetta, Y., Badollahi, M. T., Ruslan, M., & Hanafi, S. (2021). The Implementation of Underage Marriage Dispensation in Palu Religious Court. Review of International Geographical Education Online. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.800521
Masriani, Y. T. (2016). THE POSITION OF NOTARIAL DEED IN THE SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTE. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15861
Masse, R. A., & Rusli, M. (2018). Islamic Banking Dispute Resolution in National Sharia Arbitration Board. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012169
Mawardi, A. I., & Riza, A. K. (2019). Why did Kompilasi Hukum Islam succeed while its counter legal draft failed? A political context and legal arguments of the codification of Islamic law for religious courts in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Islam. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2019.13.2.421-453
Minardi, A. (2020). Two Lane Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes Between Religious Court and National Sharia Arbitration Agency (BASYARNAS). Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society, 1(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v1i2.66
Muhaimin, Husni, L., & Wira, L. (2021). Authoritative Institution In Disputes Resolution In The Conversion Of Conventional Bank To Sharia Bank. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(4), 1–8.
Mukhametzaripov, I. (2020). Religious Courts in Modern European States. Sovremennaya Evropa. https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope32020148157
Mukhametzaripov, I. A. (2020). Foreign scientific discourse about religious courts in a secular state. Religiovedenie. https://doi.org/10.22250/2072-8662.2020.1.114-122
Musjtari, D. N., Riyanto, B., & Setyowati, R. (2019). Reformulation of mediation in dispute settlement on islamic banking. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7424
MUSRIFAH, M., & KHAIRUNISA, M. (2020). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH MELALUI ARBITRASE SYARIAH. Al-Amwal. https://doi.org/10.36341/al-amwal.v9i1.142
Mustofa, K. N. (2019). Submission of Marital Dispensation for Religious Courts in Central Java: Study of Minimum Pair Age Standards Along With Judge’s Attitudes and Wisdomes. Journal de Jure, 11(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v11i1.6611
Nunkoo, R., Ramkissoon, H., & Gursoy, D. (2012). Public trust in tourism institutions. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(3), 1538–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.04.004
Osman, O., & Abdillah, K. (2019). HUKUM MATERIIL PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH (TINJAUAN UNDANG-UNDANG DAN HUKUM ISLAM). Al Huquq: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Economic Law, 1(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.19105/AL HUQUQ.V1I1.2646
Otoritas jasa Keuangan. (2020). Perkembangan Bank Syariah. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/Pages/Snapshot-Perbankan-Syariah-Indonesia-Maret-2020.aspx
Rian Andhika, L. (2018). Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Redesain Proses Kebijakan. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.3.1.2018.24-42
Ridwan, R., Zain, M. F., & Maula, B. S. (2021). The Mapping of Sharia Economic Dispute Decisions in Religious Courts. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311813
Rosidah, Z. N. (2020). Limitation of Application of Sharia Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts. Journal of Morality and Legal Culture. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmail.v1i1.44749
Rosidah, Z. N., & Karjoko, L. (2021). Orientasi Filosofis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss1.art8
Rosidah, Z. N., & Mahfiana, L. (2020). Efektivitas Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas). TAWAZUN : Journal of Sharia Economic Law. https://doi.org/10.21043/tawazun.v3i1.7529
Sakti, T. I., Kusuma, V., Pratama, A. P., & ... (2021). PUTUSAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH PENGADILAN NEGERI PASAMAN BARAT TENTANG PUTUSAN ARBITRASE BPSK KABUPATEN BATUBARA NOMOR …. Jurnal ….
Salim, M., Peng, X., Almaktary, S., & Karmoshi, S. (2017). The Impact of Citizen Satisfaction with Government Performance on Public Trust in the Government: Empirical Evidence from Urban Yemen. Open Journal of Business and Management, 05(02), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2017.52030
Samin, S. B. B. (2020). Peran Pengadilan Agama Dalam Praktik Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah. Syarikat: Jurnal Rumpun Ekonomi Syariah.
Silalahi, U. (2011). Kepercayaan Publik kepada Pemerintah Daerah Pasca Orde Baru. Ilmu Akuntansi Negara.
Siswajanthy, F. (2021). Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia. Pakuan Law Review.
Subramanian, N. (2017). Islamic Norms, Common Law, and Legal Reasoning: Muslim Personal Law and the Economic Consequences of Divorce in India. Islamic Law and Society, 24(3), 254–286. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00243p03
Sufiarina, S. (2014). URGENSI PENGADILAN AGAMA SEBAGAI PENYELESAI SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol44.no2.21
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sulistyowati, S. (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa antara Bank Sharî‘ah dengan Nasabah Bermasalah melalui Badan Arbitrase Sharî‘ah Nasional (BASYARNAS) menurut UU No. 30 tahun 1999. ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2014.9.1.193-222
Syarif, F. (2019). Perkembangan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia. Pleno Jure, 8(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v8i2.38
Vinet, L., & Zhedanov, A. (2010). A “missing” family of classical orthogonal polynomials. Dissertation Abstracts International. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201
Wahyudi, F. (2019). THE QUO VADIS OF BANCKRUPTY SETTLEMENT AND PKPU LAWS ON SHARIA BANKING. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.8.1.2019.1-20
Wahyuningsih, R. D. (2011). Membangun Kepercayaan Publik Melalui Kebijakan Sosial Inklusif. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 15(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10923
Widaningrum, A. (2017). Public Trust and Regulatory Compliance. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.28679
Wu, Y., Sun, I. Y., & Hu, R. (2016). Public trust in the Chinese police: The impact of ethnicity, class, and Hukou. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865814554309
Yahya, I. (2017). Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v10i1.921
Yanti, I., Addiarrahman, & Badaruddin. (2016). Quo Vadis Of Religious Court On The Development Of Sharia Economic Law In Indonesia. Al-Risalah, 16(2), 255–267. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v16i02.311
Zain, N. H. M., & Rosidah, Z. N. (2018). Streghtening Sharia Arbitration As a Model of Banking Dispute Resolution. Seajbel.Com, 17(4), 54–58.
Zainuddin Ali. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum (4th ed.). Sinar Grafika.
DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v22i1.26216
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
