The Language of Fatwa: Understanding Linguistic Violence in the Indonesian Ulama Council’s Fatwa on Ahmadiyah

Fariz Alnizar, Amir Ma'ruf, Fadlil Munawwar Manshur

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the linguistic violence in the Indonesian Ulama Council’s fatwa texts on Ahmadiyah. The data in this study is in the form of words, phrases, sentences, and discourses from the MUI fatwa texts in 1980 and 2005 on Ahmadiyah. Some words contain linguistic violence such as “deviant”, “infidel”, and “a state threaten”. This study concludes two forms of linguistic violence in those fatwas: the subtle and abusive forms of violence. In the subtle form, the language is operated to dominate other parties. In addition, the language is also used as an offensive and abusive expression carried out consciously in a discourse. This is used to attack other parties and as a tool to hurt others.

Abstrak:

Penelitian ini bertujuan  mengungkap kekerasan linguistik dalam teks fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) tentang Ahmadiyah. Dalam teks tersebut terdapat kata-kata yang mengandung unsur kekerasan linguistik seperti “sesat menyesatkan”, “berada di luar Islam” dan “bahaya bagi ketertiban dan keamanan negara.” Data dalam penelitian ini berupa kata, frasa, kalimat, dan wacana yang berasal dari teks fatwa MUI tahun 1980 dan 2005 tentang Ahmadiyah tersebut. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa terdapat dua bentuk kekerasan linguistik pada kedua fatwa tentang Ahmadiyah tersebut. Pertama, kekerasan linguistik bentuk halus (subtle form). Kedua, kekerasan linguistik bentuk kasar (abusive form). Pada kekerasan linguistik bentuk halus (subtle form), bahasa dioperasikan sebagai wahana untuk mendominasi pihak lain. Sementara pada kekerasan linguistik bentuk kasar (abusive form) bahasa digunakan sebagai ekspresi ofensif yang dilakukan secara sadar dalam sebuah wacana. Dalam kekerasan linguistik bentuk kasar, bahasa dimanfaatkan untuk menyerang pihak lain seperti memberi label sesat menyesatkan. Selain itu, bahasa juga digunakan sebagai sarana untuk menyakiti pihak lain.


Keywords


Fatwa; Indonesian Ulama Council; Ahmadiyah; Linguistic Violence

References

Abdillah, A., & Novianto, R. (2019). Lembaga Quasi Non Govermental Organization (Quango) dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia: Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 49(1), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no1.1913

Alnizar, F. (2019). Pretext for Religious Violence in Indonesia: An Anthropolinguistic Analysis of Fatwas on Ahmadiyya. Studia Islamika, 26(3), 417–444. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.36712/sdi.v26i3.8719

Alnizar, F. (2020). Bahasa Kekerasan Kuliner. Majalah Tempo, 87. Retrieved from https://majalah.tempo.co/read/bahasa/160605/kolom-bahasa-bahasa-kekerasan-kuliner

Alnizar, F., Ma’ruf, A., & Manshur, F. M. (2019). Perceptions and Reactions of Ahmadiyya to Fatwa Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI): An anthropological linguistics approach. Heritage of Nusantara: International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage, 9(2), 208–242.

Amin, M. (2019). Politik Sarung Ma’ruf Amin: Ma’ruf Amin Boleh Ucapkan Selamat Natal. Retrieved July 26, 2020, from Mata Najwa website: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ppve8AFzL8w

Anderson, B. R. O. (2006). Language and power : Exploring political cultures in indonesia. Kuala Lumpur: Equinox.

Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Assyaukanie, L. (2009). Fatwa and Violence in Indonesia. Journal of Religion and Society, 11(J. Relig. Soc.), 1–21.

Azhari, M. S., & Ghazali, M. H. (2019). Peta kuasa intoleransi dan radikalisme di indonesia. Depok: Inklusif.

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kemdikbud. (2018). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Daring.

Bourchier, D., & Hadiz, V. (2003). Indonesian politics and society: A reader. London: Routledge.

Bourchier, D. M. (2019). Two Decades of Ideological Contestation in Indonesia: From Democratic Cosmopolitanism to Religious Nationalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(5), 713–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1590620

Burhani, A. N. (2014). Treating Minorities with Fatwas : A Study of the Ahmadiyah Community in Indonesia. Contemporary Islam, (10), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-013-0278-3

Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Cheetham, J. (2017). The Role of morality in religious persecution in indonesia during yudhoyono’s presidency (2004-2014). The University of Sydney.

Coady, C. A. J. (1986). The Idea of Violence. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 3(1), 3–19.

Corsevski, E. W. (1998). The Physical Side of Linguistic Violence. Peace Review, 10(4), 513–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659808426195

Crouch, M. (2011). Asia-Pacific: Ahmadiyah in Indonesia: A History of Religious Tolerance under Threat? Alternative Law Journal, 36 (1), 56–57.

Dakhidae, D. (2003). Cendekiawan dan kekuasaan dalam negara orde baru. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Detik News. (2005). Masjid Ahmadiyah Kembali Diserang. Retrieved March 30, 2018, from Detik website: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-444758/masjid-ahmadiyah- kembali-diserang

Fiske, J. (1990). Introduction to communication studies. Rouletdge: Methuen & Co.Ltd.

Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301

Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural Violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305.

Galtung, J., & Galtung, J. (2008). Cultural Violence . 27(3), 291–305.

Gay, W. C. (1998). Exposing and Overcoming Linguistic Alienation and Linguistic Violence. Philosophy and Social Criticism, Vol. 24, pp. 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145379802400210

Litke, R. & Curtin, D. (Eds.), Institutional violence (pp. 13–35). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Gay, W. C. (2018). The Role of language in justifying and eliminating cultural violence. In F. Gursozlu (Ed.), Peace, Culture, and violence (pp. 31–36). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004361911

George, C. (2017). Pelitiran kebencian: Rekayasa ketersinggungan agama dan anacamannya bagi demokrasi. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Agama dan Demokrasi (PUSAD).

Gergen, K. J. (1985). The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology. American Psychologist, 40 (March 1985), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.266

Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M., & Ness, O. (2019). Social Construction And Therapeutic Practices. In Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy (p. 2688). Philadelphia: Springer International Publishing.

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce: The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gregg.

Hanssen, B. (2000). Critique of violence: Between poststructuralism and critical theory. London and New York: Routledge.

Haryatmoko. (2014). Etika politik dan kekuasaan. Jakarta: Kompas.

Hasyim, S. (2015). Fatwa Aliran Sesat dan Politik Hukum Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI). Al-Ahkam, 25(2), 241–266.

Herlambang, W. (2013). Kekerasan budaya pasca 1965. Jakarta: Marjin Kiri.

Jackman, M. R. (2002). Violence in Social Life. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140936

Kurniasari, N. D. (2012). Kekerasan dalam Media (Tinjauan Teori Kultivasi): Studi Kasus pada Peristiwa Kekerasan terhadap Anak). Jurnal Paramator Vol., 5(1), 2012.

Kusman, A. P. (2019). The vortex of power: Intellectuals and politics in indonesia’s post- authoritarian era. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lecercle, J.-J. (1990). The violence of language. New York: Routledge.

Lev, D. S. (1985). Colonial Law and the Genesis of the Indonesian State. Indonesia, 40, 57–74.

Lindsey, T. (2012). Monopolizing Islam: The Indonesian Ulama Council and State Regulation of the Islamic Economy. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies ISSN::48(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2012.694157

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Undang-undang dasar negara republik indonesia Tahun 1945. Indonesia: https://www.mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/regulation/pdf/UUD45%20ASLI.pdf.

Bakir, M. & Ubaid, A. (Eds.),. (2015). Nasionalisme islam nusantara. Jakarta: Kompas.

McCoy, M. E. (2013). Purifying Islam in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: Corporatist Metaphors and the Rise of Religious Intolerance. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 16(2), 275–316

Mas’udi, Masdar Farid. (2020) personal interview.

Msuya, E. A. (2016). Magnitude and Forms of Linguistic Violence against Teachers in Dar es Salaam Schools: A Gender Comparison. International Journal of Social Science Research 4(1), 195–213.

Mudhoffir, A. M. (2015). Political Islam and Religious Violence in Post-New Order Indonesia. Masyarakat, 20(80), 1–22.

Mudzhar, M. A. (1993). Fatwas of the council of indonesian ulama: A study of islamic legal thought in indonesia 1975-1988. Jakarta: INIS.

Noor, N. M. (2013). Ahmadiyah, Conflicts, and Violence in Contemporary Indonesia. Indonesia Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 3(1), 1–30.

Noor, N. M. (2017). Ahmadi Women Resisting Fundamentalist Persecution: A Case Study on Active Group Resistance in Indonesia. Genevawa: Globalethics.net.

NU Online. (2008). Sikap PBNU tentang Ahmadiyah. Retrieved May 27, 2020, from NU Online website: https://islam.nu.or.id/post/read/12315/sikap-pbnu-tentang- ahmadiyah

Pamungkas, C. (2017). Mereka yang terusir. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.

Posselt, G. (2017). Can Hatred Speak? On the Linguistic Dimensions of Hate Crime. Linguistik Online, 3(March).

Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Kamus besar bahasa indonesia (IV). Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departmen Pendidikan Nasional.

Putra, I. E., Holtz, P., & Rufaedah, A. (2018). Who is to Blame, the Victims or the Perpetrators? A Study to Understand A Series of Violence Targeting the Accused Heretic Group Ahmadiyah. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(2), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000186

Rahman, F. Z. (2014). State Restrictions on the Ahmadiyah Sect in Indonesia and Pakistan: Islam or Political Survival? Australian Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2014.934656

Rahmat, A. (2007). Kesesatan dalam prespektif al-qur’an: Kajian tematik terhadap istilah “dalal” dalam al-qur’an. Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Vetterling-Braggin, M. (Ed.), Sexist language: A modern philosophicalanalysis (pp. 194–2015). Littlefield: Admas and Co.

Saat, N. (2018). The State, Ulama, and Islam in Indonesia and Malaysia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the Century of Corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85–131.

Sholeh, A. N. (2016). Metodologi penetapan fatwa majelis ulama indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Silva, D. (2017). Language and Violence: Pragmatic Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.279.01sil

Siroj, S. A. (2012). Tasawuf sebagai kritik sosial. Jakarta: SAS Foundation dan LTN NU.

Sirry, M. (2013). Fatwas and Their Controversy: The Case of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI). Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 44(1), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463412000641

Suryana, A. (2018). Indonesian Presidents and Communal Violence against Non-mainstream Faiths. Southeast Asia Research ISSN: 26(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X18769393

Tempo. (2018). Persekusi Ahmadiyah Kembali Terjadi. Majalah Tempo, 20.

Wang, Q. (2018). Linguistic Violence and Online Political Communications in China: The Example of 鸡的屁 ( Ji De Pi ) as An Ironic Spoof of Gross Domestic Product in Online Debates around Environmental Issues. Global Media and China, I(14), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436418775532


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v21i1.20218

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.