Gender Awareness in Islamic Legal Education
Abstract
This article aims at discussing the integration of gender issues in Islamic legal education in Indonesia and Malaysia. In particular, this is to see how gender issues are taught to Islamic law students and integrated into the curricula to instil gender awareness. Based on empirical inquiries in the Department of Family Law of Faculty of Sharia and Law of State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta and Faculty of Sharia and Law of Academy of Islamic Studies, University of Malaya, this study finds that the attempts to include gender issues in the curricula have been still very limited and insufficient. Courses that directly discuss gender issues and human rights issues are treated merely as elective courses. Except in Jakarta UIN, currently, the specific course on gender becomes a compulsory course. Moreover, the integration of gender discussion into general courses is not easy. This depends on the willingness and awareness of the lecturers to include the discussion. The significant challenge in integrating gender issues in Islamic legal education is related to lecturers and students’ previous norms, values, and ideology. Because of this, the introduction to gender discourse becomes mind-provoking. This study relies on data from the curricula, interviews with faculties’ key figures, and Focus Group Discussion with students from both institutions.
Tulisan ini membahas tentang integrase isu gender ke dalam pendidikan hukum Islam di Indonesia dan Malaysia. Fokus penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat bagaimana isu gender diajarkan kepada mahasiswa hukum Islam dan bagaimana isu gender diintegrasikan ke dalam kurikulum untuk menanamkan kesadaran gender. Melalui penelitian empiris di Program Studi Hukum Keluarga, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta dan Jabatan Syariah dan Undang-Undang, Akademi Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya, kajian ini menemukan bahwa upaya untuk memasukan isu gender dalam kurikulum pendidikan hukum Islam masih sangat terbatas dan belum cukup. Mata kuliah-mata kuliah yang secara langsung membahas isu gender dan hak asasi manusia kebanyakan hanya dijadikan mata kuliah pilihan. Kecuali di UIN Jakarta, baru-baru ini mata kuliah terkait gender menjadi mata kuliah wajib. Selanjutnya, integrasi pembahasan gender ke dalam mata kuliah umum tidak lah mudah. Tantangan paling besar yang dihadapi adalah norma, nilai dan ideologi terdahulu yang dimiliki oleh dosen dan mahasiswa. Hal tersebut menjadikan pengenalan terhadap isu gender menantang bagi pemikiran yang sudah mereka miliki. Data pada kajian ini berasal dari kurikulum, wawancara dengan tokoh-tokoh kunci pada dua fakultas dan Focus Group Discussion dengan mahasiswa dari dua institusi.
References
Ali, N. M., Shah, H. A. R., Shukor, S. A., Mutalib, L. A., Salleh, A. Z., Majid, M. N. A., … Nor, M. M. (2018, January). The Shariah and Law Education in Malaysia in the Context of Legal Practice [Text]. https://doi.org/info:doi/10.1166/asl.2018.12020
Basten, J. (2015). Judicial education on ‘gender awareness’ in Australia. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 22(2), 151–165.
Bernama. (2018, April 3). Putrajaya to draft bill on gender equality. Retrieved August 24, 2019, from Free Malaysia Today website: https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2018/04/03/putrajaya-to-draft-bill-on-gender-equality/
Catelani, E., & Stradella, E. (2014). Equal opportunities and legal education: A mainstream perspective. European Journal of Legal Studies, 7, 180–213.
Dawson, B., Schultz, U., & Shaw, G. (2014). Gender and judicial education. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 21(3), 255–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2015.1066944
Dawson, T. B. (2014). Judicial education on social context and gender in Canada: Principles, process and lessons learned. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 21(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2015.1029487
Gender issues in teaching methods: Reflections on shifting the paradigm. -Paper presented to Feminist Legal Academics’ Workshop (1995: Canberra )-. (1995). Legal Education Review, (2), 129.
Harahap, T. R. (2018). Studi Komparatif Hukum Waris Adat Batak Mandailing Dengan Hukum Islam tentang Hak Kewarisan Anak Laki-Laki dan Perempuan. Jurnal Fatwa Hukum, 1(3). Retrieved from http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jfh/article/view/26606
Http://ebook.um.edu.my/API/ijazah%20dasar/#p=248. (n.d.).
Huda, Y. (2008). Islamic Law Versus Adat: Debate about Inheritance Law and the Rise of Capitalism in Minangkabau. Studia Islamika, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v15i2.531
Hyland, A., & Kilcommins, S. (2009). Signature pedagogies and legal education in universities: Epistemological and pedagogical concerns with Langdellian case method. Teaching in Higher Education, (1), 29.
Lumley, K. (2015). Without fear or favour, affection or ill will: Addressing gender bias in NSW judicial education. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 22(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2015.1036871
Maryulaini, A. (2018). Pelaksanaan Hak Waris Adat Anak Perempuan pada Masyarakat Marga (Lama) Rambang Kapak Tengah Kota Prabumulih di Dalam Hukum Kewarisan Islam. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v4i1.167
Nurmila, N. (2013). The Indonesian Muslim feminist reinterpretation of inheritance. In J. Burhanudin & K. van Dijk (Series Ed.), Contrasting Images and Interpretations. Islam in Indonesia (pp. 109–122). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/stable/j.ctt46mwqt.10
Owor, M., & Musoke, H. D. (2014). Neglect of gender questions at the vocational stage of judicial education in Uganda. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 21(3), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2015.1028943
Pedoman Akademik Program Strata I 2015/2016. (n.d.). Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Salim, A., Nurlaelawati, E., Natsir, L. M., & Sayuti, W. (2009). Demi Keadilan dan Kesetaraan, Dokumentasi Program Sensitivitas Jender Hakim Agama Indonesia di Indonesia. PUSKUMHAM UIN Jakarta and The Asia Foundation.
Schultz, U. (2014). Raising gender awareness of judges – elements for judicial education in Germany. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 21(3), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2015.1060703
Set timeline for Gender Equality Act: WAO. (n.d.). Retrieved August 24, 2019, from Www.thesundaily.my website: https://www.thesundaily.my/archive/set-timeline-gender-equality-act-wao-GUARCH531497
Syahirah SS, S., MS, N., & Hussein, N. (2016). A Gender Quota Policy Implementation and Women Empowerment in the Malaysian Public Sector. Australian Journal of Sustainable Business and Society, Vol. 2, No. 1, March 2016, 2, 59–68.
The Progress of Gender Mainstreaming in Malaysia and Problems to be Solved. (n.d.). 3.
Vujadinovic, D. (2015). Gender mainstreaming in law and legal education. Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu, 63, 56–74. https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1503056V
Watanabe, C. (2014). Japanese judicial education: Working toward gender equality in the judiciary. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 21(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2015.1029486
Zin, N. M. (2012). The Training, Appointment, and Supervision of Islamic Judges in Malaysia. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 21(1), 115–131
DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v19i1.12560
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.