MESSAGE ABUNDANCY IN THE REPORT GENRE: VISUAL-VERBAL RELATION IN THE ENGLISH FOR NUSANTARA TEXTBOOK

Authors

  • Firly Asyifa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Ika Lestari Damayanti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Iyen Nurlaelawati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v12i2.50007

Keywords:

English for Nusantara; genre; message abundancy; visual-verbal relations

Abstract

Textbooks play a role in exposing learners to genres, demonstrating how texts are structured and used in social settings. One of the ways is through message abundancy, where concepts are expressed through multiple ways multiple times to enhance comprehension. Drawing on the framework of visual-verbal relations of meaning proposed by Daly and Unsworth (2011) and Unsworth (2006), the study explores how visual modes concurrent or complement verbal meanings or vice versa, contributing to message abundancy. Specifically, the study analyzes how this is achieved in the learning activities related to the report genre in the English for Nusantara (EfN) textbook Grade 7. Findings show that both concurrent meanings (equivalent and redundant) and complementary meanings (augmented) contribute to message abundancy. No divergent meaning was found, indicating that the verbal and visual modes did not contradict each other, as distracting details might hinder learning. This is supported through picture cues with wordboxes, model texts and hands-on activities, dialogues paired with comic strips, and genre stage tables combined with blank writing templates. Thus, through multimodal layering, the textbook reinforces meaning by visually re-expressing verbal modes, provides opportunities for matching, repeating, and applying language through visuals and sentence-building tasks, offers parallel input across modes, and situates language in context, strengthening recognition of vocabulary and the genre-specific features.

Author Biographies

  • Firly Asyifa, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

    Firly Asyifa is a graduate student in the English Education Study Program at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Her research interests focus on English language education, particularly in the areas of multimodal literacy and English for Academic Purposes (EAP).

  • Ika Lestari Damayanti, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

    Ika Lestari Damayanti is a Professor in the English Education Study Program at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia. Her areas of expertise include EFL methodology, genre-based pedagogy, literacy, and storytelling. She has conducted extensive research and led numerous workshops in these fields. She is also one of the authors of the English for Nusantara textbooks for Years 3 to 9, published by the Indonesian Ministry of Education.

  • Iyen Nurlaelawati, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

    Iyen Nurlaelawati is a Lecturer in the English Education Study Program at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia. Her research focuses on English language teaching and teacher education, with particular emphasis on genre-based pedagogy, reading and writing instruction, and the development of pedagogical competence among pre-service and in-service teachers. Her scholarly interests also include supervision practices, instructional coaching, and reflective approaches in teacher education, including the use of digital platforms to support professional learning.

References

Anderson, R. C., Chaparro, E. A., Smolkowski, K., & Cameron, R. (2023). Visual thinking and argumentative writing: A social-cognitive pairing for student writing development. Assessing writing, 55.

Callow, J. (2020). Visual and verbal intersections in picture books – multimodal assessment for middle years students. Language and Education, 34(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2019.1689996

Daly, A., & Unsworth, L. (2011). Analysis and comprehension of multimodal texts. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(1), 61 80. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/48262

Derewianka, B. (2004). Exploring how texts work. Primary English Teaching Association.

Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching writing: Developing critical learners. Rizqi Press.

Fitriana, W., & Wirza, Y. (2021, April). An analysis of multimodal text in EFL textbook of secondary school in Indonesia in assisting students’ text understanding. In Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020) (pp. 627-632). Atlantis Press. DOI:10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210427.095

Feez, S., & Joyce, H. (1998). Writing skills narrative & non-fiction text types. Phoenix Education Pty Ltd.

Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content‐based classroom. TESOL quarterly, 37(2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588504

Gibbons, P. (2012). Scaffolding academic language and literacy with school-aged english language learners. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 1(2), 51-65.

Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Heinemann.

Hammond, J. (2014). An Australian perspective on standards‐based education, teacher knowledge, and students of English as an additional language. Tesol Quarterly, 48(3), 507-532. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.173

Hammond, J. & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect. 20(1), 6-30.

Hladíková, H. (2014). Children’s book illustrations: Visual language of picture books. CRIS - Bulletin of the Centre for Research and Interdisciplinary Study, (1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.2478/cris-2014-0002

Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written communication, 22(2), 224-261.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre and second language writing. The University of Michigan Press

Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2003). Multimodal literacy. Peter Lang.

Kang, S. (2004). Using visual organizers to enhance EFL instruction. ELT journal, 58(1), 58-67.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practices of second language acquisition. Pergamon.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Lähdesmäki, S. (2009). Intertextual analysis of Finnish EFL textbooks: Genre embedding as recontextualization. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini & D. Figuereidedo (Eds.) Genre in a Changing World, (pp. 375-392), Parlor Press.

Lotherington, H., & Jenson, J. (2011). Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in L2 settings: New literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226-246. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190511000110

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox.

O’Halloran, K. L., & Smith, B. A. (2012). Multimodal text analysis. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/978140519 8431.wbeal0817

O’Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2) 104-111.

Ørevik, S. (2019). Mapping the text culture of the subject of English. Genres and text types in national exams and published learning materials. [Doctoral dissertation-ved Universitetet i Bergen]

Paltridge, B. (1996). Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT journal, 50(3), 237-243.

Prihatiningsih, F., Petrus, I., & Silvhiany, S. (2021). Cultural representation in EFL textbooks for the seventh graders: A multimodal analysis. Lingua Cultura, 15(1), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i1.7319

Richards, J. C. (2001). The role of textbooks in a language program.

Roohani, A., & Hosseini, M. (2021). Analysis of culture and multimodality in a local English textbook series. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 9(2), 171-193. https://dx.doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2021.27190.1287

Rose, D. (2011). Beyond literacy: Building an integrated pedagogic genre. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(1), 81-97.

Rose, D. (2017). Languages of Schooling: embedding literacy learning with genre-based pedagogy. EuJAL, 5(2), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-000

Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn.

Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: developing an educational linguistics. In Hasan & Williams (eds.) Literacy in Society. Applied Linguistics and Language Study.

Serafini, F. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. Teachers College Press.

Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT journal, 42(4), 237-246.

Syahid, A., Hapsari, M. S., Anisah, S., Almadani, T. N. F., & Maharani, W. A. (2024). Analyzing English Textbook through the Lens of Tomlinson’s Theory. International Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 1(2), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijets.v1i2.39

Unsworth, L. (2006). Towards a metalanguage for multiliteracies education: Describing the meaning-making resources of language-image interaction. English Teaching: Practice an Critique, 5(1), 55-76. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ843820.pdf

Van Haren, R. (2010). Engaging learner diversity through learning by design. E-learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 258-271. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.258

Varaporn, S., & Sitthitikul, P. (2019). Effects of multimodal tasks on students’ critical reading ability and perceptions.

Weninger, C. (2021). Multimodality in critical language textbook analysis. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(2), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1797083

Windle, J., Miller, J. (2012). Approaches to teaching low literacy refugee-background students. AJLL, 35, 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651891

Wu, S. (2014). A multimodal analysis of image-text relations in picture books. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.7.1415-1420

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

MESSAGE ABUNDANCY IN THE REPORT GENRE: VISUAL-VERBAL RELATION IN THE ENGLISH FOR NUSANTARA TEXTBOOK. (2025). IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v12i2.50007