1. Home
  2. Vol 3, No 1 (2015)
  3. Dewi

Pengaruh Tipe Kepribadian dan Religiusitas Terhadap Subjective Well Being Pada Wanita Yang Berperan Ganda di Jakarta

Chintya Eka Dewi, Ima Sri Rahmani

Abstract


The aim of this study is to determine the predictor variable for subjective well being as dependent variable of woman with multiple roles. Two independent variables, namely personalitiy and religiousity, are used in order to determine which one of these two independent variables would be the best predictor for „subjective well being.‟ As a quantitative research, the multiple regression analysis is used to measure 200 respondents working at some companies located in North Jakarta and Central Jakarta. Scale measurement is modified from the original scale constructed by Diener et.al (1985) for Subjective Well Being Scale, Watson et.al (1988) for Personality Scale and Lewis Goldberg (1992), Fetzer Institute (1999) for Religiousity for our own research. There is a significant influence that personality and religiousity could be a predictif factor to measure „a subjective well being‟ of woman with multiple role. Dimension measured for the variable of personality here are agreebleness, conscientiousness, and openess to experience, while for religiousity: private religious practice, religious/spiritual history, and organizational religiousness.

Keywords


subjective well being, type of personality, religiousity, woman with multiple role

References


Brown & Tierney. (2006). Religion and Subjective well-being Among

China‟s Elderly Population. Goldfarb Center Working Paper, 007-038.

DeNeve, K., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis

of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological

Bulletin, 124 (2), 197-229.

Diener, E. (2005). Guidelines for National indicators of subjective wellbeing and ill-being. Positive Psychology Center. University of Pennyslvania.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95 (3), 542-575.

Diener, E. (2013). The remarkable changes in the science of subjective wellbeing.

Journal of Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10 (2), 321- 345.

Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The

satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49 (1), 203-235.

Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1984). Temporal stability and cross-situational

consistency of affective, behavioral, and cognitive responses. Journal of

Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (4), 871–883.

Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective wellbeing:

Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (2), 276-302.

Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D.G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion

makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?. Journal of

Personality and Social Psychology, 101 (6), 1278-1290. doi: 10.1037/a0024402.

Feist, J., & Feist, G.J. (2010). Theories of personality, 7th ed. teori

kepribadian, edisi 7, buku 2. Smita Prahita Sjahrini (Terj). Jakarta:

Penerbit Salemba Humanika.

Goldberg. (1992). Possible questionnaire format


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15408/tazkiya.v20i1.9195

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.