ANALYSIS OF TEST ITEM ON THE FINAL TEST SEMESTER EXAM ON ARABIC SUBJECTS

Yogia Prihartini, Wahyudi Buska, Nur Hasnah

Abstract


This research is aimed; (a) to give a description about Arabic final semester test questions arrangements procedure at the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. (b) to give a description about the quality of the test as seen from its validity, reliability, difficulty, and differentiation capacity. (c) to give a description that the lecturers never did an exam questions analysis of Arabic exam subject at Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. This research uses the descriptive method with quantitative and qualitative data. The population within this research is the college students of Tadris major in faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training who follows the final semester exam of 2017-2018 tenet years, especially in Arabic test subject. The sample taken during this research is the college students from the Tadris major, who followed the final semester exam on Arabic subject, by using the purpose sampling technique. The data collecting technique used was documentation, interview, and questionnaires. The results of this research are (1) the types of this tests are achievement test from the teaching objectives aspect, teacher-made test from the arrangement aspect, summative test from the time of implementation aspect, written test from the method of performing aspects, and subjective test from the answer scoring aspect, (2) the quality of Arabic test year 2017/2018: (a) validity sufficient, (b) test reliability is high which is 0,74, (c) the difficulty is easy earning it a ‘bad’ category, which is 45 numbers of questions or 11,11%, (d) the differentiation capacity is bad, which is 45 numbers of questions, or 22,22%, (3) the reason why the lecturers and question maker team did not held a question analysis are as follows: (a) some of the Arabic lecturers in faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training in UIN Imam Bonjol Padang are not scholars of Arabic education major or not lenient with S-1 and S-2 academic degree, (b) they have zero experience in doing test analysis, (c) there is no order from the authorities which motivates the lecturers in doing test analysis, (d) the lack of understanding about analysis, and (e) there are lecturers who have never received training or seminar about evaluation and analysis.

Keywords


Analysis; Item Test; Final Test; Arabic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd Wahab Rosyidi & Mamlu’atul Ni’mah. Memahami Konsep Dasar Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab.Malang: UIN-Maliki Press. 2011.

Abdul Wahab Rosyidi. Media Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Malang: UIN Malang, 2009.

Arsyad, Azhar, Bahasa Arab dan Metode Pengajarannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Cet. Pertama.2003.

Ahmad Izzan, Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab, Bandung: Humaniora,2004

Ahmad Munawwari, Belajar Cepat Tata Bahasa Arab, Yogyakarta: Nurma Media Idea,2007.

Abdul Aziz, Psikolinguistik Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Bandung: Humaniora.2009.

Ahmad Fuad Effendi, Metodologi Pengajaran Bahasa Arab, Malang: Misykat ,2005.

Ahmad Izzan, Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab, Bandung: Humaniora.2004.

Ahmad Munawwari, Belajar Cepat Tata Bahasa Arab, Yogyakarta: Nurma Media Idea,2007.

Arif Sadiman, Media Pendidikan: Pengertian, Pengembangan dan Pemanfaatannya,Jakarta; PT Raja Grafindo,2003.

Arikunto, Suharsimi, Manajemen Penelitian, Jakarta:Rineka Cipta,2000.

Ahmad, Nâshir Sayyid., dkk, al-Mu’jam al-Rasyîd, Beirut: Dâr al-Ihyâ’ al-Turâts al- Arabiyyah. .2008.

As-Syanty, M.S, al-Maharat al-Lughawiyah, Madkhal ila khashaish al-Lughah al-Arabiyah wa fununuha, Dar al-Andalus li an-Nasyrwa al-Tauzi’.2003.

Azwar, Saifuddin, Reliabilitas dan Validitas, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1997.

Arikunto, Suharsimi, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara,1993.

A.Chaedar Alwasilah. Pokoknya Kualitatif:Dasar-Dasar Merancang Dan Melakukan Penelitian Kualitatif.(Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.2002.

Benson, P., & Nunan, D,Learners’ stories: Difference and diversity in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.2005.

Brown, H. D, Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Personal Education. Inc.2007.

Buchori, Muchtar, Teknik-Teknik Evaluasi dalam Pendidikan, Bandung: Jemmars,1980.

Djiwandono,Tes Bahasa Dalam Pengajaran, Bandung:ITB.1996.

Echols, Jhon M dan Hasan Sadily, 1995, Kamus Inggris Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia

Ghulayani, Sekh Mustofa. Jami’ud durus al-’Arabiyah, Beirut: Al-Maktabah Al’Ashriyyah. .2003.

Harjanto, Perencanaan Pengajaran, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta,2000.

Harmer, J,The practice of English language teaching. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education,2007.

Hermawan, Acep, Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. .2011..

Imaduddin Sukamto, Tata Bahasa Arab Sistematis, Yogyakarta: Norma Media,2004.

Kasiram,Teknik Analisa Item Tes Hasil Belajar Dan Cara-Cara Menghitung Validity dan Reliability, Surabaya:Usaha Nasional.1984.

M. Abdul Hamid, Mengukur Kemampuan Bahasa Arab. Malang: UIN Maliki Press, 2010.

Muhbib Abdul Wahab, Epistemologi dan Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2008.

Madkur, Âli Ahmad, Al-Tadrîsu Fununu al-Lughati al-Arabiyyati, Omân: Dâr al-Masîratu. .2009.

Moleong, Lexy J, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Cetakan VIII, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset. 2000.

Nurkancana, Wayan dan PPN Sumartana, Evaluasi Pendidikan, Surabaya: Usaha Nasional. 1986.

Purwanto, Prinsip-Prinsip Dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. 2002.

Robert E. Slavin, Cooperative learning Teori, Riset, dan Praktik, Bandung: Nusa Media.2005.

Richard. J. C. & Schmidt,Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics 3rd Edition, Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.2005.

Richard I. Arends, Terj. Learning to Theach. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.2008.

Rahardjo, Mujdia, Relung-Relung Bahasa, Bahasa Dalam Wacana Politik Indonesia Komtemporer, Aditya Media, Yogyakarta.2002.

Radliah Zainudin, Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab, Jakarta:Pustaka Rihlah Group.2005

Sudjana, Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.2001

Syu’aib,H. A. Tharaiq al-Tadris al-lughah al-Arabiyah, Beirut: Dar al-Ulum al-Arabiyah.2011

Sanjaya, Wina, Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2011

Sudijono, Anas, Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.1996.

Sudjana, Nana, Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar, Cetakan IX, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.2004

Tim Redaksi, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.2002.

Thursan Hakim, Belajar Secara Efektif. Jakarta: Puspa Swara.2001.

Thoha, Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan, Cetakan V, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.2003.

Yayan Nurbayan, Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab, Bandung : Zein Al-Bayan.2008.

Zainudin, Radliah, Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Jakarta: Pustaka Rihlah Group.2005.

Uno, Hamzah B, Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.2009.

Walter Dick Lou Carey James O.Carey, Developing an Instructional strategy, England.2006.

Yûnus, Muhammad, Qâmûsu ‘Arabiyyun-Indûnîsiyyun, Jâkarta: Hidakarya Agung, 1989.

Yunus, Fathi Ali. Asasiyatu Ta'limi Al-Lughah Al-Arabiyah wa At-Tarbiyah Ad-Diniyah. Daru Tsaqafah. Kairo. Tt.

Yayan Nurbayan, Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab, Bandung : Zein Al-Bayan.2008.

Zainudin, Radliah, Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Jakarta: Pustaka Rihlah Group.2005.

Zainil,. Actional Fuction Model (AFM). Sukabina Offset. Padang.2008.

Zaini, Hisyam dkk, Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif, Yogyakarta, CTSD.2004.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v6i1.10926 Abstract - 0 PDF - 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

CrossRef CrossRef DOAJ sinta Google Scholar Advanced Sciences Index (ASI) MoraRef MoraRef


 

License

© Copyright CC BY-SA

web analytics View My Stats

Arabiyat, p-ISSN: 2356-153X, e-ISSN: 2442-9473